Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A connected cover with a chosen lifted identity has a unique lifted Lie-group structure

Statement

Let p:G~G be a covering map with G~ connected and G a connected Lie group. For a chosen e~p1(e), there is a unique Lie-group structure on the given topological space G~ whose identity is e~ and for which p is a covering homomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The covering p:G~G, the stated connectedness hypotheses, and one chosen point e~ over the identity e of G.

[F1]

The covering gives G~ a unique smooth-manifold structure for which p is a local diffeomorphism. Connected covers of smooth manifolds have a canonical smooth structure.

[F2]

A based map from a path-connected locally path-connected space lifts through a covering exactly when its induced fundamental-group image lies in the covering subgroup; the based lift is unique. Lifting criterion for maps from path-connected locally path-connected spaces.

[F3]

Two lifts from a connected space that agree at one point agree everywhere. Two lifts from a connected space that agree at one point agree everywhere.

[F4]

Pointwise multiplication of loops in a topological group represents their fundamental-group product. Pointwise inversion therefore represents the inverse class. Pointwise multiplication and concatenation of loops in a topological group agree up to homotopy.

[F6]

Proof

Proof technique: lift multiplication and inversion and use uniqueness of lifts for the group laws.

1.1

Give G~ the canonical smooth structure of [F1]. Its finite products are connected by [F5], and are locally path connected as products of manifold coordinate domains; hence they are path connected by [F6].

F1F5F6
2.1

Consider the based map f=m(p×p):(G~2,(e~,e~))(G,e). For a based loop γ=(α,β) in G~2, [F4] gives [fγ]=[pα][pβ]. Both factors lie in the subgroup pπ1(G~,e~), so their product does also. The criterion [F2] therefore supplies a unique based lift m~:G~2G~ satisfying p(m~(a,b))=p(a)p(b) and m~(e~,e~)=e~.

F2F4step 1.1
2.2

Similarly, the based map ap(a)1 lifts to a unique based map inv~:G~G~. Indeed, [F4] identifies the class of the pointwise inverse of pα with [pα]1, which remains in the subgroup pπ1(G~,e~).

F2F4step 1.1
3.1

The two maps (a,b,c)m~(m~(a,b),c) and (a,b,c)m~(a,m~(b,c)) are lifts through p of the same map (a,b,c)p(a)p(b)p(c), and they agree at (e~,e~,e~). Their connected domain and [F3] give associativity. Likewise am~(e~,a), am~(a,e~), and aa are lifts of p agreeing at e~, so e~ is a two-sided identity.

F3F5step 2.1
4.1

The maps am~(inv~(a),a) and am~(a,inv~(a)) both project to the constant map with value e and agree at e~ with the constant map having value e~. By [F3] they are that constant map, so inv~(a) is the two-sided inverse of a. Thus (G~,m~,inv~,e~) is a group and p is a group homomorphism.

F3step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1
5.1

The lifted maps are smooth. Around any source point choose a neighborhood whose image under a lift lies in one sheet over a smooth coordinate domain; there the lift is the composite of its smooth projection to G with the smooth local inverse of p supplied by [F1]. This applies to m~ and inv~, so the group is a Lie group and p is a covering homomorphism.

F1step 2.1step 2.2step 4.1
6.1

Any other such Lie-group structure has the same smooth structure by [F1]. Its multiplication and inversion are based lifts of the two maps used in steps 2.1 and 2.2, so [F2] makes them equal to m~ and inv~. This proves uniqueness. Subgroup closure is the exact property used in steps 2.1 and 2.2, and uniqueness of based lifts supplies every group law. The only choice is the one explicitly chosen basepoint e~; no choice principle is invoked.

F1F2step 2.1step 2.2step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources