How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuous adapted processes are measurable at bounded stopping times
Statement
Assume AC and use the usual augmented Brownian filtration of Natural and usual augmented Brownian filtrations. Let be an adapted, finite-dimensional real process with continuous paths on a measurable event of probability one. If is a stopping time with , then the stopped random vector is -measurable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a usual augmented Brownian filtration; an adapted -valued process on with paths continuous on a measurable full-probability event; and a stopping time .
Every ambient measurable null set and each of its subsets belong to , hence to every . Natural and usual augmented Brownian filtrations
is a stopping time when for every , and consists of events with for every . Continuous-time stopping times and stopped sigma-algebras
Adaptedness means is -measurable for every deterministic , and the filtration is increasing. Continuous-time filtrations and all-pairs martingales
AC is inherited from the usual augmented Brownian-filtration convention; the deterministic-grid approximation below makes no selection. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Fix and, for each integer , form the deterministic grid . Let be the least point of greater than or equal to . For , by [F2] and [F3]; for the event is all of . Thus is a finite-valued stopping time, , and . Each event belongs to by subtracting consecutive sublevel events, so the finite-valued variable is -measurable by [F3].
Define as the limit of where that finite vector limit exists, and as otherwise. Since each approximant is -measurable, is -measurable. On and on the full-probability continuity event, and continuity gives . The case follows directly from and .
For any Borel set , the events and differ only on the measurable null set where path continuity may fail. The second event is in by [F2] and step 2.1; [F1] places their symmetric difference in , so the first event is in . At this also gives . All tests in [F2] hold, proving . AC enters only through [A1].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Joseph C. Watkins, Stochastic Processes in Continuous Time, §§1.3–1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)