Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The backward LQR adjoint equation has a unique solution

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.

For every LQR data set in Finite-horizon bounded-control linear-quadratic ODE problem and every admissible control u, the adjoint in Continuous adjoint equation for the linear-quadratic ODE exists and is unique.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the bounded measurable matrices A,Q, state xu, target xd∈L2, and terminal value P(xu(T)−xT).

[F1]

The linear state lemma supplies a unique absolutely continuous solution of its Volterra integral equation for C,D∈L∞ and v∈L2; under Countable Choice this constructed solution also satisfies y˙=C(t)y+D(t)v(t) almost everywhere (The bounded measurable linear ODE has a unique affine state map, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F2]

The adjoint is defined by −p˙=ATp+Q(xu−xd) and p(T)=P(xu(T)−xT) (Continuous adjoint equation for the linear-quadratic ODE).

[F3]

Under Countable Choice, an absolutely continuous vector curve with known L1 derivative equals its initial value plus the componentwise Lebesgue integral of that derivative (AC zero-derivative constancy and integrable-derivative reconstruction under Countable Choice).

[F4]

An absolutely continuous scalar function is continuous, and a continuous scalar function on a compact interval is bounded; these apply to each of the finitely many coordinates (C1 implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation, A continuous real function on a compact subset of R is bounded).

[F5]

On the finite horizon, ∥g∥L1≤T ∥g∥L2 componentwise (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F6]

The reflection τ(s)=T−s is a C1 diffeomorphism of (0,T) onto itself with ∣τ′(s)∣=1. The L1 change-of-variables formula therefore preserves integrals and null sets under τ, so reflection preserves the L2 and L∞ classes used below (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4F6givenconstruct

The forcing g(s):=Q(T−s)(xu(T−s)−xd(T−s)) lies in L2(0,T;Rn) by [F6]: Q is essentially bounded, xu is continuous on a compact interval and hence bounded, and xd∈L2. Also C(s):=A(T−s)T∈L∞ by [F6]. Apply [F1] with D(s)=I and initial value q(0)=P(xu(T)−xT) to obtain an absolutely continuous q satisfying the forward Volterra integral equation and q˙=Cq+g almost everywhere.

2.1F6step 1.1F2algebra

Set p(t)=q(T−t). Each coordinate remains absolutely continuous because reflection preserves interval lengths and disjoint interiors in the defining finite-family condition of Absolute continuity on a compact interval. At points where the coordinate derivatives exist, the difference-quotient definition and the chain rule for t↦T−t give p˙(t)=−q˙(T−t); [F6] carries the exceptional null set to a null set. The forward equation for q therefore gives −p˙(t)=A(t)Tp(t)+Q(t)(xu(t)−xd(t)) almost everywhere, and p(T)=q(0)=P(xu(T)−xT). Thus p satisfies [F2].

3.1F1F3F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

If p~ is another adjoint solution, reflection gives a coordinatewise absolutely continuous q~(s)=p~(T−s) as in step 2.1, with q~(0)=q(0) and q~˙=Cq~+g almost everywhere by [F6]. By [F4], q~ is continuous and bounded componentwise. Since C∈L∞, g∈L2 and [F5] gives g∈L1, the function h=Cq~+g belongs to L1 componentwise. Apply [F3] to obtain q~(s)=q(0)+∫0s(C(r)q~(r)+g(r)) dr for every s. This is exactly the forward Volterra equation used to construct q in step 1.1. Its actual integral-equation uniqueness in [F1] gives q~=q, hence p~=p.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Continuous adjoint equation for the linear-quadratic ODE.

Dependency tree · two levels

68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources