How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The backward LQR adjoint equation has a unique solution
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.
For every LQR data set in Finite-horizon bounded-control linear-quadratic ODE problem and every admissible control , the adjoint in Continuous adjoint equation for the linear-quadratic ODE exists and is unique.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the bounded measurable matrices , state , target , and terminal value .
The linear state lemma supplies a unique absolutely continuous solution of its Volterra integral equation for and ; under Countable Choice this constructed solution also satisfies almost everywhere (The bounded measurable linear ODE has a unique affine state map, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The adjoint is defined by and (Continuous adjoint equation for the linear-quadratic ODE).
Under Countable Choice, an absolutely continuous vector curve with known derivative equals its initial value plus the componentwise Lebesgue integral of that derivative (AC zero-derivative constancy and integrable-derivative reconstruction under Countable Choice).
An absolutely continuous scalar function is continuous, and a continuous scalar function on a compact interval is bounded; these apply to each of the finitely many coordinates ( implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation, A continuous real function on a compact subset of is bounded).
On the finite horizon, componentwise (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for ).
The reflection is a diffeomorphism of onto itself with . The change-of-variables formula therefore preserves integrals and null sets under , so reflection preserves the and classes used below (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).
Proof
The forcing lies in by [F6]: is essentially bounded, is continuous on a compact interval and hence bounded, and . Also by [F6]. Apply [F1] with and initial value to obtain an absolutely continuous satisfying the forward Volterra integral equation and almost everywhere.
Set . Each coordinate remains absolutely continuous because reflection preserves interval lengths and disjoint interiors in the defining finite-family condition of Absolute continuity on a compact interval. At points where the coordinate derivatives exist, the difference-quotient definition and the chain rule for give ; [F6] carries the exceptional null set to a null set. The forward equation for therefore gives almost everywhere, and . Thus satisfies [F2].
If is another adjoint solution, reflection gives a coordinatewise absolutely continuous as in step 2.1, with and almost everywhere by [F6]. By [F4], is continuous and bounded componentwise. Since , and [F5] gives , the function belongs to componentwise. Apply [F3] to obtain for every . This is exactly the forward Volterra equation used to construct in step 1.1. Its actual integral-equation uniqueness in [F1] gives , hence .
Depends on
- Continuous adjoint equation for the linear-quadratic ODE
- The bounded measurable linear ODE has a unique affine state map
- Finite-horizon bounded-control linear-quadratic ODE problem
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- AC zero-derivative constancy and integrable-derivative reconstruction under Countable Choice
- $C^1$ implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation
- A continuous real function on a compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$ is bounded
- Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2$
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions
Used by
- A bounded-actuator LQR control and its exact objective Example
- The LQR adjoint identity gives the reduced gradient Lemma
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Continuous adjoint equation for the linear-quadratic ODE.
Dependency tree · two levels
68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Monnier, Optimal Control of ODEs: The Linear-Quadratic (LQ) Case, course notes, Chapter 2 §2.5.2 (standard reference, not scraped)