Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cutting an irreducible manifold along incompressible tori preserves irreducibility

Statement

Assume full AC. Let M be a compact irreducible piecewise linear 3-manifold with a finite compatible triangulation. Let T be a finite family of pairwise disjoint, two-sided, incompressible piecewise linear tori that are subcomplexes of that triangulation. Every component obtained by cutting M along T is irreducible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the compact irreducible finite PL manifold, disjoint two-sided incompressible PL torus family and cut component of the Statement.

[A1]

The original full AC assumption is The Axiom of Choice. No essential use of it occurs in the finite argument below.

[F1]

Here irreducibility and incompressibility are in the PL category specified in the Statement: an interior PL sphere bounds a PL ball, and a PL compressing disk has essential boundary on its surface and otherwise misses it. These are the geometric conventions of Incompressibility, Seifert fibrations, and JSJ systems, interpreted in that explicit category.

[F2]

A two-sided PL torus in a parametrized finite PL ball has a PL compression contained in the ball's interior; its local PL flatness and compatible bicollar are supplied by the full link-disk and cut-collar proof. Two-sided PL tori in a parametrized PL ball have PL compressions

[F3]

A compact PL ball and the finite PL torus polyhedra inside it have common compatible finite subcomplex subdivisions. A PL embedded polyhedron becomes a subcomplex after subdivision

Proof

1.1F1F3givenconstruct

Let S be a PL sphere in the interior of the selected cut component. Its image in M is a PL sphere missing every cutting torus, so bounds a parametrized PL ball B by [F1]. Each connected cutting torus lies wholly inside or wholly outside that sphere. If a torus lies inside B, its existing two-sided neighborhood can be shrunk into Int⁡B, by compactness and a common smaller product width. It remains a PL embedded torus there. [F3] supplies the compatible finite subdivisions needed for [F2], even if the original triangulation of B was different from the one containing the torus.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1construct∎

Such an inside torus would have the PL compressing disk of [F2] entirely in B⊂M, contradicting its original incompressibility. Thus B misses every cutting torus. The connected ball interior lies in the same complement component as its collar along S, so B lifts to a PL ball in the specified cut component with boundary S. Every interior PL sphere there therefore bounds a PL ball. This is precisely PL irreducibility; no smooth-ball or arbitrary-topological-marking claim entered.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources