Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Essential companion tori for nontrivial companions and incompressible nonproduct patterns

Statement

Assume full AC. Let K be a nontrivial smooth knot with a specified companion solid torus V=e(S1×D2), let P⊂int⁡(S1×D2) be a pattern, and assume the outer torus of its pattern exterior XP has no compressing disk and is not product-parallel to the inner pattern torus. Let Tc=∂V=e(∂(S1×D2))⊂EP(K) be the companion torus. Then Tc is incompressible and is not boundary-parallel in EP(K); hence it is essential.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a nontrivial smooth knot K, the supplied orientation-preserving companion product embedding e:S1×D2→S3, and the specified pattern exterior with incompressible outer boundary and nonproduct ends.

[F1]

The pattern exterior and satellite exterior are defined in Satellite pattern, companion, and winding number. With V=e(S1×D2), the common torus is ∂V=e(∂(S1×D2)). Identifying the pattern exterior with its image, the satellite exterior is XP∪∂VEK.

[A1]

Full AC permits coset-transversal choices (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

A nontrivial knot with a supplied smooth product tube has injective exterior boundary. Its proof also verifies exterior connectedness. A nontrivial knot with a supplied product tube has injective exterior boundary

[F3]

Strong smooth Loop applies to a connected boundary subsurface of a compact connected orientable smooth three-manifold. Thus absence of essential-boundary proper smooth disks implies injection of that subsurface group. Smooth Loop theorem and the smooth incompressibility criterion

[F4]

Van Kampen identifies the union group with the pushout; when both side maps are injective, the normal form with fixed transversals embeds the common group. Seifert–van Kampen identifies the fundamental group with a group pushout Normal form theorem for free products with amalgamation

[F5]

Finite compact-source transversality avoids a curve by an embedded arc in a three-manifold; finite graph fields and compact flows give smooth collars. Choice-free relative transversality for a compact smooth embedding Choice-free isotopy extension for a compact smooth source

[F6]

Incompressibility, boundary-parallelity and essentiality have the smooth conventions of Incompressibility, Seifert fibrations, and JSJ systems.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F5givenconstruct

Put X=e(XP) and Y=EK. They are compact orientable smooth three-manifolds with common boundary torus Tc. The exterior Y is connected by [F2]. For completeness X is connected as well: in the standard connected solid torus join two points of XP by a path consisting of finitely many smooth chart arcs. Remove repeated arcs and perturb finitely many joins in small coordinate balls to obtain an embedded arc, fixed near its endpoints; in dimension three finitely many arcs can be made disjoint except at consecutive endpoints by small finite chart perturbations. By [F5] perturb it to avoid the pattern core P. On the punctured supplied tube of P, radial projection to its boundary, extended by the identity outside that tube, is continuous and sends this path into XP. Consequently all exterior points are connected by paths. The outer torus has no compressing disk by hypothesis, so [F3], with the entire outer boundary component as subsurface and normal subgroup 1, gives π1(Tc)↪π1(X). The companion product tube is exactly the supplied input of [F2], so π1(Tc)↪π1(Y) too. Both applications are smooth; an abstract finite PL disk has not been treated as a smooth disk.

2.1A1F1F4F5step 1.1constructalgebra

Use finite smooth collars of the common torus to enlarge the two sides to a connected open cover whose intersection retracts to Tc. Van Kampen and the amalgam normal form [F4], with transversals supplied by [A1], then make π1(Tc) inject into π1(EP(K)). Any compressing disk would make its essential torus boundary nullhomotopic in the union, contradicting that injection. Thus Tc is incompressible.

3.1F1F6step 1.1step 2.1givenconstruct∎

The only boundary of the satellite exterior is the inner pattern torus Tin=∂e(N(P)). The two components cut along Tc are the connected pieces X and Y from step 1.1; only X meets Tin. Suppose there were a boundary-parallel product region R with ends Tc,Tin. Its interior must lie in X: it cannot cross either of its two boundary tori, and its collar at Tin is on the X side. Moreover R exhausts X. Indeed Int⁡R is open in Int⁡X by the smooth full-dimensional product charts, and closed relative to Int⁡X because R is compact and its boundary lies in ∂X. The interior of the connected manifold X is connected, as is seen by pushing any boundary portions of a path into its finite collar. Hence Int⁡R=Int⁡X, and taking closures gives R=X. Transporting that product by e−1 would identify XP with a product between its two marked ends, contrary to hypothesis. Therefore Tc is not boundary-parallel. For this closed torus boundary-incompressibility is vacuous, so it is essential by [F6].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources