Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The degree-zero horseshoe lift

Statement

Let 0AiApA0 be a short exact sequence, and let P0A,P0A be the degree-zero terms of projective resolutions of A and A. Then there exists an epimorphism λ0:P0P0A whose restrictions to the two summands are iε and a lift of ε through p. In particular P0P0 is projective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The short exact sequence above and projective resolutions of A and A.

[L1]

Projective resolutions provide the augmentations and projective degree-zero terms (Projective resolutions in an abelian category).

[L2]

Projective objects lift across epimorphisms (Projective object).

[L3]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since p:AA is epic and P0 is projective, [L2] lifts the augmentation ε:P0A to a map s:P0A with ps=ε.

L1L2construct
2.1

Define λ0(x,y):=iε(x)+s(y). To hit a given aA, first choose yP0 with ε(y)=p(a). Then as(y) lies in ker(p)=im(i), so as(y)=i(a) for some aA, and some xP0 satisfies ε(x)=a. Hence λ0(x,y)=a, so λ0 is epic. Its source is projective by [L3].

L1L3step 1.1construct

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources