Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Derivative ideals under semilinear ground-field isomorphisms

Statement

Let K and K′ be fields of characteristic zero and let σ ⁣:K⟶∼K′ be a field isomorphism; both fields have prime subfield Q (Field, A field's prime subfield is isomorphic to Q in characteristic zero and to Fp in characteristic p). Let X be a smooth K-scheme and X′ a smooth K′-scheme (Smooth morphism of schemes). Suppose φ ⁣:X′→X is a σ-semilinear isomorphism, meaning that it is an isomorphism of Q-schemes and its pullback acts on the ground-field constants by σ (Morphisms of schemes).

Then for every coherent ideal sheaf I⊆OX and every i≥0, φ∗(DKi(I))=DK′i(φ∗I), where the derivative ideals on X and X′ are formed using K- and K′-derivations, respectively (Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Fields K,K′ of characteristic zero, a field isomorphism σ ⁣:K→K′, smooth schemes X/K and X′/K′, a σ-semilinear isomorphism φ ⁣:X′→X, and a coherent ideal sheaf I⊆OX.

[F1]

Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal: DK(I) is generated locally by I and the sections D(f) for K-derivations D; DKi is the i-fold iterate, and similarly over K′.

[F2]

Derivation of an algebra: a derivation is additive, satisfies the Leibniz rule, and is linear over the indicated ground field.

[F3]

Morphisms of schemes: on corresponding open sets the isomorphism induces inverse ring isomorphisms φ∗ and (φ∗)−1, and semilinearity means φ∗(c)=σ(c) for c∈K.

[F4]

Field, A field's prime subfield is isomorphic to Q in characteristic zero and to Fp in characteristic p: the prime subfields of K and K′ are both Q, and σ fixes that prime field.

Proof

1.1F2F3F4

Transport derivations. Let D be a K-derivation of OX(U) and define D′ on OX′(φ−1U) by D′(g)=φ∗(D((φ∗)−1g)). If c′=σ(c)∈K′, then semilinearity gives D′(c′g)=φ∗(cD((φ∗)−1g))=c′D′(g) because D(c)=0; the Leibniz rule follows by conjugating the Leibniz rule for D. Thus D′ is a K′-derivation. Conjugation by φ∗ is bijective, with inverse conjugation by (φ∗)−1.

2.1F1step 1.1∎

Derivative ideals agree. For each local section f∈I(U), one has D′(φ∗f)=φ∗(D(f)). As D varies, the bijection in step 1.1 identifies all K-derivative generators with all K′-derivative generators, so φ∗(DK(I))=DK′(φ∗I). Applying this identity successively to each derivative ideal gives φ∗(DKi(I))=DK′i(φ∗I) for every i≥0.

Remarks

  • Włodarczyk's Lemma 4.3.1 states this for varieties over one characteristic-zero field and an isomorphism over Q; the semilinear formulation above also permits relabelling the ground field along an isomorphism K≃K′.
  • In particular, this applies to the automorphisms of an algebraic closure in Galois descent; those automorphisms need not be linear over the algebraic closure.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources