How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dihedral Fox coloring counts are preserved by Reidemeister moves
Statement
Let be an odd prime. A Fox -coloring of a finite regular oriented link diagram assigns an element of to each arc and satisfies at every crossing, where is the overarc color and are the two underarc colors. If is obtained from by planar isotopy or one oriented Reidemeister move of type R1, R2, or R3, restriction outside the move disk gives a bijection from the Fox -colorings of to those of . Consequently the number of Fox -colorings is unchanged along every finite sequence of such moves. The local bijections use no choice principle.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An odd prime and a finite regular oriented link diagram changed to by one planar isotopy or one oriented R1, R2, or R3 move.
Quandles and knot-diagram colorings: a quandle coloring assigns one element to each arc and at a crossing the target underarc color is the source underarc color acted on by the overarc color.
The dihedral operation is a quandle: on , the operation is ; each right translation is an involution, and .
Oriented Reidemeister moves: each local move is supported in a disk, all strand orientation/sign variants are included, and a planar isotopy transports the diagram and its decorations.
Proof
For fixed , define . Then , so . Also . Thus both the forward and reverse crossing rules use the same involution, and an arc's color is uniquely recoverable across one underpass.
In an R1 disk, the coloring relation on the kinked side is either or , where is the unchanged boundary color and is the color of the new interior underarc. In the first case by idempotency; in the second, has the unique solution because is bijective. Deleting the kink is the inverse restriction map. The two formulas cover both strand directions because the inverse operation equals the operation by step 1.1.
In an R2 disk, fix the color of the strand passing over the other strand and the incoming underarc color . The first crossing changes the underarc color to , and the second changes it by ; their composition is . Therefore every boundary coloring extends uniquely across the two-crossing side, and the reverse R2 move gives the inverse bijection. Other orientation variants replace one of these maps by its inverse, which is the same map by step 1.1.
For a braid-like R3 orientation, start with boundary colors . Propagating through the two sides gives respectively and . The last coordinates agree by right self-distributivity in [F2], so every boundary coloring on either side has a unique matching extension on the other. Reversing a crossing replaces a right translation by its inverse; step 1.1 makes that the same map, and relabeling the three strands gives every height-order and orientation variant in [F3].
If is empty, its unique empty coloring is carried to itself by planar isotopy, and no Reidemeister move is supported on the empty diagram. If is nonempty, planar isotopy carries every arc and local crossing relation bijectively to its image, while steps 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 give explicit coloring bijections for every local move. Composing the finitely many bijections along any finite move sequence preserves the coloring count. These constructions act on finite arc labels and use no choice principle.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Danny Calegari, Introduction to Knot Theory, University of Chicago course notes (2025), §4.1, pp. 30–32 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Justin Roberts, Knots Knotes, Edinburgh course notes (1999), §3.3, pp. 16–18 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Józef H. Przytycki, 3-coloring and other elementary invariants of knots, §1, arXiv:math/0608172 (standard reference, not scraped)