How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Divided differences are symmetric leading coefficients
Statement
For distinct real nodes and assigned values , Consequently the divided difference is symmetric in its nodes. It is the coefficient of in the unique polynomial of degree at most that takes the assigned values at those nodes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , distinct real nodes , and real data .
Divided differences on distinct nodes: the order-zero value is and the recursive rule is for .
Cardinal-polynomial interpolation and Existence and uniqueness of the cardinal-polynomial interpolant: after sorting the distinct nodes and carrying their data along, the cardinal Lagrange sum is the unique real polynomial of degree at most taking the assigned values.
The natural numbers (von Neumann): , so the order-zero case is included.
The principle of mathematical induction: a property true at and preserved by successor holds for every natural number.
Proof
For each define . Its denominators are nonzero, and equals when and otherwise. Sort the nodes increasingly, carrying their data along. Reindexing the finite sum and products does not change them, so [F2] applies and is the unique polynomial of degree at most taking the assigned values.
The coefficient of in is the displayed sum, because the leading coefficient of is . The sum is unchanged by any permutation of the nodes, since the permutation only reorders its terms and their symmetric denominators.
We prove that the recursively defined divided difference equals this leading coefficient by induction on using [F4]. Since by [F3], for both are . For , substitute the induction formula for the two order- differences in [F1] and divide by . For an interior index , the resulting coefficient of is For , only the second recursive term contributes and its minus sign supplies the missing factor ; for , only the first term contributes and division supplies . Their coefficients are also . This is exactly the coefficient in step 2.1.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lloyd N. Trefethen, Approximation Theory and Approximation Practice, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean-Paul Berrut and Lloyd N. Trefethen, Barycentric Lagrange Interpolation, Sections 2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)