How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hermite–Genocchi simplex formula for divided differences
Statement
Let , let , and let be distinct real nodes. For , define Then For , the integral is by convention evaluation at , and . For , the integral over is the iterated Riemann integral with and, successively, for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and distinct nodes .
Divided differences on distinct nodes: divided differences satisfy the recursive endpoint rule.
Divided differences are symmetric leading coefficients: divided differences are symmetric in their nodes.
Higher derivatives and the classes and : means its derivatives through order exist and are continuous, including their one-sided endpoint extensions.
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: for a continuous function on a closed interval whose interior derivative has a Riemann-integrable extension, the integral of that extension is the endpoint increment.
The natural numbers (von Neumann): , so the order-zero base case is included.
The principle of mathematical induction: a property true at and preserved by successor holds for every natural number.
Proof
For , which is allowed by [F5], the integral convention gives and the zero-dimensional simplex has volume one.
By [F6], use induction on . Suppose the formula is established in order , where . In the recursive rule [F1], express the two order- divided differences by the induction hypothesis. The bottom face has argument and gives . On the top face , the same argument is and gives by symmetry [F2]. For fixed with sum less than , the derivative with respect to of is . The derivative is continuous by [F3], hence Riemann integrable. Applying [F4] on the interval, followed by integration over the other coordinates, shows that the difference of the two face integrals is times the -dimensional integral in the statement. When the outer coordinates sum to , the inner interval is and its integral is zero; for there are no outer coordinates and the interval is . Division by gives the order- formula.
By [F6], prove the volume formula by induction, with its case from step 1.1. For , fix the outer coordinate . The remaining coordinates form a -simplex scaled by . If , its zero-dimensional volume is ; if and , the dilation to has Jacobian , while the section at has -volume zero. Thus, by induction, the section volume is . The function has derivative ; applying [F4] to on gives . The induction and the divided-difference identity prove the statement.
Depends on
- Divided differences on distinct nodes
- Divided differences are symmetric leading coefficients
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- Higher derivatives and the classes $C^k$ and $C^\infty$
- Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on $[a,b]$, differentiability on $(a,b)$, and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
- The principle of mathematical induction
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Carl de Boor, Divided Differences, Section 9, Genocchi–Hermite, pages 63–65, formula (52) (standard reference, not scraped)