How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded variation controls adjacent Hermite–Genocchi windows
Statement
Let , let , let be real nodes, and fix a real query point distinct from the nodes. Let , put , and suppose has finite total variation as defined in Bounded variation and total variation on an interval. For , put . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , ordered real nodes , a distinct query point in their interval, , and .
Hermite–Genocchi simplex formula for divided differences: an order- divided difference is the integral of over the standard simplex, whose volume is .
Bounded variation and total variation on an interval: is the supremum, over finite partitions of the interval, of the sums of absolute successive increments of .
Higher derivatives and the classes and : means that the derivatives through order exist and are continuous on the closed interval.
The natural numbers (von Neumann): contains and is closed under successor, so .
Proof
By [F4], , so apply [F1] to each , using the same simplex coordinates for each window and using the final coordinate for the fixed point . Thus where all coefficients are nonnegative and sum to one. By [F3], is continuous on the closed interval. Therefore every lies in .
For each fixed , the sequence is nondecreasing: each summand is nondecreasing in and has coefficient . Remove repeated values from this finite sequence and insert the interval endpoints; the definition [F2] then gives Using [F1], the triangle inequality for integrals, and this pointwise bound, This is the claimed total variation bound.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael S. Floater and Kai Hormann, Barycentric rational interpolation with no poles and high rates of approximation, Sections 2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)