Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Approximate privacy admits purification of a joint measure with fixed history marginal

Statement

Assume AC. Let H,Y be arbitrary measurable spaces, let λ be a probability measure on H, and let K,L be probability kernels from H to Y. Suppose ε≥0, 0≤δ≤1, and, for every h and every measurable A⊆Y, K(h,A)≤eεL(h,A)+δ,L(h,A)≤eεK(h,A)+δ. Define probability measures on the product sigma-algebra by R(B)=∫HK(h,Bh)λ(dh),S(B)=∫HL(h,Bh)λ(dh). There is a probability measure T on H×Y whose H marginal is λ, such that, as inequalities of measures, e−εS≤T≤eεS,TV⁡(R,T)≤δ. Here TV⁡(U,V)=sup⁡B∣U(B)−V(B)∣. No countability or topological condition is imposed on either measurable space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, arbitrary measurable H,Y, probability λ, probability kernels K,L, and the pointwise two-directional event bounds in the Statement.

[A1]

AC is assumed for ordinary Radon–Nikodym derivatives of finite measures; the whole space is a common finite exhaustion.

[F2]

A nonnegative density defines a measure. Monotone convergence extends identities for indicator integrals first to simple functions and then to nonnegative measurable functions.

[F3]

Borel composition preserves measurability of the finite scalar clipping and correction formulas below.

[F4]

At u=0, The exponential is positive and satisfies exp⁡(−x)=1/exp⁡(x) gives exp⁡(0)=1/exp⁡(0)>0, hence exp⁡(0)=1. Then The exponential function is strictly increasing gives a=exp⁡(ε)≥1 for ε≥0, and the reciprocal identity gives 1/a=exp⁡(−ε)>0.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3givenchooseconstruct

By [F1], the integrands defining R,S are measurable. Countable additivity follows by applying monotone convergence to disjoint sections, and total mass is one. The same argument gives μ=(R+S)/2=λ⊗M, where M=(K+L)/2 is the explicit mixture probability kernel and the notation λ⊗M denotes the displayed iterated integral. Both R,S have marginal λ. By [A1], choose a density of R relative to μ. The inequality 0≤R≤2μ forces this density into [0,2] almost everywhere: a positive-measure level set violating a bound would contradict that measure inequality. Clip it into [0,2] and call the result p; put q=2−p. Thus p,q are finite nonnegative product-measurable densities of R,S relative to μ. The indicator identities extend to nonnegative integrands by [F2].

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1givenconstruct

Write a=exp⁡(ε)≥1 by [F4]. Let E={p>aq} and F={p<q/a}, both product-measurable. For every measurable history event C, apply the assumed event inequality to Eh for h∈C, and integrate. The density identities give ∫C×Y(p−aq)+ dμ=R(E∩(C×Y))−aS(E∩(C×Y))≤δλ(C). Similarly ∫C×Y(q/a−p)+ dμ≤(δ/a)λ(C). Define α(h)=∫(p−aq)+(h,y)M(h,dy) and β(h)=∫(q/a−p)+(h,y)M(h,dy). These are finite measurable functions. Localization over all C implies α≤δ and β≤δ/a almost everywhere, since a violating positive-measure level set could be used for C. Likewise, the common history marginals imply ∫p(h,y)M(h,dy)=∫q(h,y)M(h,dy)=1 for λ-almost every h, by equality of their integrals over every C. Let G be the measurable conull set where all four scalar conditions hold. Only the two specified joint level sets and scalar marginal identities have been used; no simultaneous fiberwise density representation is asserted.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

Put c=min⁡{max⁡{p,q/a},aq} and m(h)=∫c(h,y)M(h,dy). On G, m=1−α+β and q/a≤c≤aq. If m<1, set w=c+1−ma−m(aq−c); if m>1, set w=c−m−1m−1/a(c−q/a); if m=1, set w=c. Every used denominator is strictly positive and its fraction lies in [0,1]. These formulas give q/a≤w≤aq and ∫w(h,y)M(h,dy)=1 on G. Off G, set w=q. All formulas are measurable by [F1] and [F3]; each division is confined to its stated measurable branch. In particular, when a=1, c=q and m=1 on G, so no zero denominator is used.

4.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Define T(B)=∫Bw dμ. By [F2] this is a measure. The conditional normalization on G and the fact that Gc is λ-null imply T(C×Y)=λ(C), so T is a probability measure with the required marginal. Integrating q/a≤w≤aq gives S/a≤T≤aS. On G, clipping changes p by conditional absolute integral α+β, and the correction changes c in one direction by conditional absolute integral ∣1−m∣=∣α−β∣. Consequently ∫∣p−w∣ dμ≤2∫max⁡{α,β} dλ≤2δ. Because p,w have equal total integral, the positive and negative parts of p−w have the same integral; every event integral lies between these two extrema, attained by its sign sets. Thus TV⁡(R,T)=12∫∣p−w∣ dμ≤δ. This proves all claims, including δ=0 and ε=0.

Source notes

The source gives the clipping/redistribution idea and the advanced-composition reduction for discrete distributions. The proof here supplies the joint-measure construction on arbitrary measurable spaces. Its conclusion concerns measures with a fixed marginal and does not claim a measurable family of fiberwise Radon–Nikodym derivatives or a disintegration of T.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources