How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Approximate privacy admits purification of a joint measure with fixed history marginal
Statement
Assume AC. Let be arbitrary measurable spaces, let be a probability measure on , and let be probability kernels from to . Suppose , , and, for every and every measurable , Define probability measures on the product sigma-algebra by There is a probability measure on whose marginal is , such that, as inequalities of measures, Here . No countability or topological condition is imposed on either measurable space.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, arbitrary measurable , probability , probability kernels , and the pointwise two-directional event bounds in the Statement.
AC is assumed for ordinary Radon–Nikodym derivatives of finite measures; the whole space is a common finite exhaustion.
Probability kernels, measurable sections, and kernel integration measurability apply on the arbitrary product sigma-algebra.
A nonnegative density defines a measure. Monotone convergence extends identities for indicator integrals first to simple functions and then to nonnegative measurable functions.
Borel composition preserves measurability of the finite scalar clipping and correction formulas below.
At , The exponential is positive and satisfies gives , hence . Then The exponential function is strictly increasing gives for , and the reciprocal identity gives .
Proof
By [F1], the integrands defining are measurable. Countable additivity follows by applying monotone convergence to disjoint sections, and total mass is one. The same argument gives , where is the explicit mixture probability kernel and the notation denotes the displayed iterated integral. Both have marginal . By [A1], choose a density of relative to . The inequality forces this density into almost everywhere: a positive-measure level set violating a bound would contradict that measure inequality. Clip it into and call the result ; put . Thus are finite nonnegative product-measurable densities of relative to . The indicator identities extend to nonnegative integrands by [F2].
Write by [F4]. Let and , both product-measurable. For every measurable history event , apply the assumed event inequality to for , and integrate. The density identities give . Similarly . Define and . These are finite measurable functions. Localization over all implies and almost everywhere, since a violating positive-measure level set could be used for . Likewise, the common history marginals imply for -almost every , by equality of their integrals over every . Let be the measurable conull set where all four scalar conditions hold. Only the two specified joint level sets and scalar marginal identities have been used; no simultaneous fiberwise density representation is asserted.
Put and . On , and . If , set ; if , set ; if , set . Every used denominator is strictly positive and its fraction lies in . These formulas give and on . Off , set . All formulas are measurable by [F1] and [F3]; each division is confined to its stated measurable branch. In particular, when , and on , so no zero denominator is used.
Define . By [F2] this is a measure. The conditional normalization on and the fact that is -null imply , so is a probability measure with the required marginal. Integrating gives . On , clipping changes by conditional absolute integral , and the correction changes in one direction by conditional absolute integral . Consequently . Because have equal total integral, the positive and negative parts of have the same integral; every event integral lies between these two extrema, attained by its sign sets. Thus . This proves all claims, including and .
Source notes
The source gives the clipping/redistribution idea and the advanced-composition reduction for discrete distributions. The proof here supplies the joint-measure construction on arbitrary measurable spaces. Its conclusion concerns measures with a fixed marginal and does not claim a measurable family of fiberwise Radon–Nikodym derivatives or a disintegration of .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Measure kernel and probability kernel
- The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
- A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density
- The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure
- Measurability of integration against a kernel
- Every section of a product-measurable function is measurable
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability
- The exponential function is strictly increasing
- The exponential is positive and satisfies $\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x)$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Dwork and Roth, The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy, Lemma 3.17 and Theorem 3.20 (standard reference, not scraped)