How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Each real layer has a ground-model cardinal bound
Statement
In the Feferman–Levy model, for every there is a surjection . In particular . Jech's sharper bookkeeping gives equality; only the displayed upper bound is used below.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A ground model and the layer for one fixed . Cardinal arithmetic in this proof is performed in .
The real layers of the Feferman–Levy model defines as the set of -sequences of coefficients from and as its interpretation.
Fixed Boolean values come from initial collapse layers says that is generated by restrictions to the first collapse layers.
The Axiom of Choice records the ground-model Choice used to compare the cardinals of the coding sets; no Choice assertion about is made.
Proof
The set has ground cardinal at most : its elements are finite functions using ordinals below the finitely many cardinals for (and for it is a singleton). Every regular open generated by is a subset of , so F2 gives . This deliberately coarse estimate covers uniformly.
By F1, a member of is coded by a function . In ground ZFC and GCH, step 1.1 gives . Since the constantly-zero name belongs to , ground Choice supplies a fixed surjection .
Form the canonical name . Every value name belongs to and is fixed by , so fixes and all its subnames. Thus it is hereditarily symmetric. Its interpretation is the function , whose range is exactly by F1. Hence contains the required surjection.
The ground use of Choice and GCH occurred only in steps 1.1–2.1 to obtain the single coded enumeration . Step 3.1 puts its interpretation in without choosing enumerations for a family of arbitrary sets. This proves the asserted internal bound.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas Jech, The Axiom of Choice, Lemma 10.8, printed p. 144 (standard reference, not scraped)