Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Each real layer has a ground-model cardinal bound

Statement

In the Feferman–Levy model, for every m<ω there is a surjection m+1VRm. In particular Rmm+1V. Jech's sharper bookkeeping gives equality; only the displayed upper bound is used below.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A ground model VZFC+GCH and the layer Rm for one fixed m<ω. Cardinal arithmetic in this proof is performed in V.

[F1]

The real layers of the Feferman–Levy model defines Sm as the set of ω-sequences of coefficients from Bm and Rm as its interpretation.

[F2]

Fixed Boolean values come from initial collapse layers says that Bm is generated by restrictions to the first m collapse layers.

[F3]

The Axiom of Choice records the ground-model Choice used to compare the cardinals of the coding sets; no Choice assertion about N is made.

Proof

technique · direct coding and interpretation of one bounded-support enumeration
1.1

The set P<m={pm:pP} has ground cardinal at most mV: its elements are finite functions using ordinals below the finitely many cardinals nV for n<m (and for m=0 it is a singleton). Every regular open generated by P<m is a subset of P<m, so F2 gives BmV2mV=m+1V. This deliberately coarse estimate covers m=0 uniformly.

F2F3
2.1

By F1, a member of Sm is coded by a function ωBm. In ground ZFC and GCH, step 1.1 gives SmV(2mV)0=2mV=m+1V. Since the constantly-zero name belongs to Sm, ground Choice supplies a fixed surjection em:m+1VSm.

F1F3step 1.1
3.1

Form the canonical name e˙m={ξˇ,x˙,1B:ξ<m+1V and x˙=em(ξ)}. Every value name belongs to Sm and is fixed by Hm, so Hm fixes e˙m and all its subnames. Thus it is hereditarily symmetric. Its interpretation is the function ξem(ξ)G, whose range is exactly Rm by F1. Hence N contains the required surjection.

F1step 2.1
4.1

The ground use of Choice and GCH occurred only in steps 1.1–2.1 to obtain the single coded enumeration em. Step 3.1 puts its interpretation in N without choosing enumerations for a family of arbitrary sets. This proves the asserted internal bound.

F3step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources