Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Energy identity for FE-HMM micro tensor error

Statement

For a fixed macro sample K in Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes, let bK be its sampled coefficient, wK,p∈V# the full periodic cell solution, and wK,ph∈WM its micro P1 solution from Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves. Set ∥∇v∥bK2=∫YbK∣∇v∣2. Then p⋅(AKh−AKex)p=∥∇(wK,ph−wK,p)∥bK2≥0, and for any zh∈WM, ∥∇(wK,ph−wK,p)∥bK≤∥∇(zh−wK,p)∥bK. In particular ∥AKh−AKex∥op≤ηK2, where ηK=sup⁡∣p∣=1inf⁡zh∈WM∥∇(zh−wK,p)∥bK and ∥M∥op=sup⁡∣p∣=1∣Mp∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The full and finite periodic cell equations use the same scalar coefficient bK, the micro space is a subspace of V#, and both solutions are unique.

[F1]

Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes: WM⊂V# and the full/discrete sampled equations use the same bK.

[F2]

Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves: both cell solutions exist uniquely and their tensor energy representation is symmetric.

[F3]

Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: the cell variational equation holds for every test in V#.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3algebra

Write ep=wK,ph−wK,p. Subtracting the two variational equations gives ∫YbK∇ep⋅∇zh=0 for every zh∈WM. Thus ep is orthogonal in the bK gradient inner product to the whole micro space. For any zh, ∥∇(wK,p−zh)∥bK2=∥∇ep∥bK2+∥∇(wK,ph−zh)∥bK2, which proves the best-approximation inequality.

2.1F2step 1.1F1algebra∎

For p,q∈R2, the symmetric energy representation in [F2] and the full/discrete equations imply p⋅(AKh−AKex)q=∫YbK∇ep⋅∇eq. Indeed, expanding the two energy bilinear forms leaves this term; each cross term vanishes by testing the full equation with the difference in V# or the discrete equation with a micro function in WM. Taking q=p proves the identity. For unit p,q, Cauchy--Schwarz bounds the right side by ∥∇ep∥bK∥∇eq∥bK≤ηK2 by step 1.1. The supremum over unit vectors is the operator norm, giving the final bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources