How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homogenization, multiscale FEM and heterogeneous media
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Absolute Convergence and the Wiener Algebra
- Adaptive finite-element methods
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Direct Matrix Factorisations: LU, Cholesky and QR
- Dirichlet Kernel Localisation and Pointwise Fourier Convergence
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite element pde constrained optimization
- Finite-element meshes and interpolation
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fredholm Elliptic Problems and the Elliptic Spectrum
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Harmonic Functions and Mean Values in Rn
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Isogeometric Galerkin discretization
- Lax--Milgram and Weak Elliptic Solutions
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measure-Preserving Systems and Mixing Criteria
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Approximation and Sobolev Extension
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Sobolev Poincare and Morrey Inequalities
- Square-Integrable Kernels and Hilbert–Schmidt Compactness
- Stone–Weierstrass in General
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak and Weak Star Topologies
- Weak Derivatives and Sobolev Spaces
2 · Summary
This page treats measurable, uniformly elliptic scalar coefficients that are periodic on the unit lattice. It defines the mean-zero periodic cell space, proves cell solvability and the symmetric uniformly elliptic effective tensor, then establishes two-scale compactness and identifies the weak Dirichlet homogenized limit on the unit cube. Strong convergence follows from a locally proved Fourier compactness argument. A quantitative first-order corrector estimate is stated only for homogenized solutions and includes an explicit boundary cutoff and antisymmetric flux potential.
The multiscale discretization branch is FE-HMM on a square in two dimensions. It uses an admissible newest-vertex-bisection macro triangulation, continuous zero-boundary P1 macro functions, periodic P1 micro functions, barycenter samples, and exact cell integrals. The local proof separates the macro best-approximation error, finite micro-space error, and continuum sampling/resonance error. Integer-aligned periods remove only the resonance term; the one-dimensional nonaligned calculation exhibits a nonzero sampling error. No general accuracy claim is made for arbitrary scale ratios or nonperiodic coefficients.
Macro and micro sampling convention
In the schematic, is one closed macro triangle and its barycenter. The translated micro square has lower corner and center . Opposite micro edges are identified for the fluctuation space; the colored edges and arrows show matching traces under translations by and . The coefficient in rescaled micro coordinates is . The drawing illustrates the data layout only; every equation and error bound is proved in the item text.
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.0, line cap=round, line join=round]
\draw[thick] (0,0) -- (3.4,0) -- (0,2.5) -- cycle;
\node at (0.85,0.95) {$K$};
\fill[red] (1.13,0.83) circle (2pt);
\node[red, below right] at (1.13,0.83) {$x_K$};
\draw[dashed,gray] (1.13,0.83) -- (4.3,1.35);
\draw[thick,blue] (4.5,0.45) rectangle (6.9,2.85);
\node at (5.7,1.55) {$x_K+\delta Y$};
\draw[->,blue,thick] (4.75,0.25) -- (6.55,0.25);
\draw[->,blue,thick] (7.15,0.7) -- (7.15,2.5);
\draw[<-,blue,thick] (4.75,3.05) -- (6.55,3.05);
\draw[<-,blue,thick] (4.25,0.7) -- (4.25,2.5);
\node[blue] at (5.65,-0.05) {$\delta e_1$};
\node[blue,rotate=90] at (7.45,1.65) {$\delta e_2$};
\node at (5.7,3.35) {periodic P1 fluctuation};
\end{tikzpicture}
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data
Definition
Fix an integer and the unit cell with Lebesgue measure . Assume Countable Choice for the conventions of The Axiom of Countable Choice (). A uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion coefficient is a measurable real function such that for almost every and every , and there are constants with almost everywhere on . Coefficients are identified when they agree almost everywhere.
For , the physical scalar coefficient is and the associated matrix is . The bounded-domain branch used on this page is with homogeneous zero boundary values. Its weak equation for datum is No coefficient regularity beyond measurability and the displayed bounds is part of this definition.
For every , the map is a diffeomorphism of . By A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, its pullback preserves Lebesgue measurability and takes null-set changes to null-set changes (apply the theorem also to the inverse map). Thus is a well-defined almost-everywhere class independent of the representative of . The same result applies to every affine translation and positive dilation used in periodic sampling below, so almost-everywhere coefficient bounds are preserved under those pullbacks.
The ellipticity bounds hold almost everywhere on all of , not just on : periodicity transfers the exceptional null set from to each lattice translate, translations preserve null sets by the same change-of-variables theorem, and the countably many translates cover up to their null boundaries.
Axiom use
Countable Choice is inherited through the real and complex and Sobolev class conventions. No Axiom of Choice or Dependent Choice is asserted here.
Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space
Definition
Fix , , and Countable Choice for the Sobolev conventions of The Axiom of Countable Choice (). Let be the restrictions to of smooth -periodic real functions on . Define The integral is the normalized cell mean because . Derivatives are weak derivatives on and the periodic condition is the closure convention in this definition; no pointwise boundary trace is being imposed. Equip with the inherited norm.
Remarks
The cell Poincaré inequality on this exact mean-zero space is proved in Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell. Its conclusion makes an equivalent complete norm on .
Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and let , . Then is a separable real Hilbert space. It satisfies Moreover, every sequence bounded in has a subsequence converging in . These conclusions use Countable Choice only; no Axiom of Choice or Dependent Choice is needed in the proof below.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, the unit cube , and the Sobolev-closure convention for .
Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure: is the -norm closure of , and Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms gives ; coordinate derivatives are indexed by ( maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).
The Sobolev space is a Hilbert space: under Countable Choice, is Hilbert and is its closed Hilbert subspace.
Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of for : rational box-step functions give a countable dense family in .
The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: on a finite torus, Fourier characters are a complete orthonormal basis and Parseval holds.
Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence.
If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, and Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: the coordinate fundamental theorem, Cauchy--Schwarz for integrals, and iterated integration apply to the smooth cube calculations.
Affine pullback of weak derivatives and Sobolev seminorms and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: affine rescaling preserves Sobolev membership, transforms weak derivatives by the affine chain rule, and changes integrals by its determinant.
Proof
Let and write with first library coordinate and (the empty tuple when ). For fixed and , the one-dimensional fundamental theorem gives . Cauchy--Schwarz and imply . Integrating first in and then in gives . By [F1], approximating any in and passing to the limit proves the displayed Poincaré bound.
The map , , is an isometry for the Sobolev norm by [F1]. The target is separable: extend each coordinate by zero to and restrict the countable dense rational-box family [F3]. The image and its subset are separable subspaces of a second-countable metric space: intersect a countable base with the subspace and choose one point from each nonempty basic set, a countable selection allowed by Countable Choice. Thus is separable.
For , extend it by zero to and identify opposite faces of to obtain a smooth function on the torus of side length . The extension preserves the norms. By [F1], for every choose test functions converging to in ; their periodic zero extensions are Cauchy in on this torus, so the extension is in periodic and the same norm bound holds.
Rescale affinely to the unit torus using [F7]; the characters on the side-length- torus are . For a periodic function , integration by parts on smooth periodic approximants and passage in give for . The zero extension in step 1.3 is supported away from the identified faces, so its weak derivatives on the torus are exactly its zero-extended weak derivatives on . Parseval [F4] therefore yields , with a fixed constant accounting for the side length . Hence for every integer , .
Let be bounded in , and write for the periodic zero extensions from step 1.3. For each fixed Fourier mode , the complex coefficients are bounded, so their real and imaginary parts are bounded real sequences. Use the following fixed extraction rule for any bounded real sequence : let be the least positive integer bounding all , start with , and bisect repeatedly, keeping the left closed half if it contains infinitely many terms and otherwise the right closed half. At stage take the least index larger than the previous index whose term lies in the retained interval. Each such index exists, and the selected terms are Cauchy because the intervals are nested with lengths tending to zero; [F5] then implies they converge. This defines a unique subsequence from the input sequence, without choice. Enumerate the real and imaginary parts of the Fourier modes, recursively apply this fixed rule to the current subsequence for the next coordinate, and let be the th index of the th nested subsequence. These diagonal indices increase strictly and form a tail subsequence of every fixed earlier extraction, so every coefficient converges; this recursion uses a specified function, not Dependent Choice. If its terms are , then for fixed the sum of squared coefficient differences over tends to zero as , while by step 2.1 the sum over is at most uniformly in . First choose large, then large; Parseval shows is Cauchy in . Completeness gives an limit, and restriction to gives the required convergence.
Periodic scalar cell problem
Definition
For coefficient , cell , and zero-mean periodic space from Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space, and for , the weak periodic cell equation asks for such that The sign convention is ; the zero-mean condition fixes the additive constant. This definition alone asserts neither existence nor uniqueness.
Remarks
Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors supplies existence, uniqueness, linearity, and energy bounds for this definition.
Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell
Statement
Let and be the mean-zero periodic space of Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space. Then every satisfies and every satisfies . Consequently is a complete norm on equivalent to its inherited norm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the closure definition of and , Countable Choice, coordinatewise FTC, integral Cauchy--Schwarz, and Tonelli.
Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space: is the closure of smooth periodic functions; is its closed subspace of functions with integral zero.
If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz: the one-dimensional FTC applies to each smooth coordinate slice.
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases: Cauchy--Schwarz bounds an integral over an interval of length at most one.
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: the unit-cube integrals can be evaluated by iterated integration.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is the declared background for the Sobolev closure conventions.
maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space: coordinate derivatives on are indexed by , and .
The Sobolev space is a Hilbert space: under Countable Choice, the real Sobolev space is Hilbert and hence complete in its inherited norm.
Proof
For smooth periodic and each coordinate , opposite-face values agree, so integrating that coordinate derivative over and applying the one-dimensional FTC [F2] gives . Approximate an arbitrary in by smooth periodic functions using [F1]; convergence of the derivatives in implies convergence of their integrals by [F3] and . Thus every component of is zero.
For smooth periodic , write . For , telescope from to one coordinate at a time, in order . The th difference is the integral of along a segment of length at most one, with the earlier coordinates fixed at and later coordinates fixed at . Cauchy--Schwarz [F3] bounds its square by the integral of along the full unit coordinate interval. The inequality and Tonelli [F4], integrating in and , then give For each , Jensen's inequality gives . Integrating in proves the stated inequality for smooth periodic mean-zero .
Approximate any in by smooth periodic using Countable Choice [F5]. Their means converge to zero by Cauchy--Schwarz, so are smooth periodic mean-zero functions converging to in . Passing to the limit in step 1.2 proves the inequality on . By [F7], is complete. Its closure-defined subspace is closed, and the mean is continuous by , so is closed in . Every -Cauchy sequence in therefore has an ambient limit in , proving completeness of its inherited norm. The inequality shows the gradient norm and norm are equivalent, hence the gradient norm is complete too.
Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube
Statement
Let , , be extended -periodically, and . As , If and , then . In particular, for , weakly in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A periodic or function on the unit cell, a compactly supported slow factor, cell tiling by , affine change of variables for Lebesgue-measurable functions, Cauchy--Schwarz, and smooth density in .
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases: integral Cauchy--Schwarz holds on and on each cell.
Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in : is dense in .
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: affine pullbacks preserve the measurability and almost-everywhere class of periodic functions and transform nonnegative integrals by the determinant.
If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz: the bounded gradient of the slow factor gives along each line segment in a grid cell.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): the periodic representatives and classes use the stated Countable Choice convention.
Proof
Tile by cells . Only cells meet the fixed compact support of . On each such cell choose its lower corner . The mean-value bound gives . By [F3], . Therefore replacing by on every intersecting cell changes the integral by at most ; for sufficiently small , every such cell is contained in because the support is compact in . Extend by zero to a compactly supported function on . For all sufficiently small , the grid sum has only cells in a fixed bounded box, and since the total volume of those cells is uniformly bounded. Thus the grid Riemann sums converge. By [F3], the change-of-variables identity first holds for and separately; subtracting their finite integrals gives for signed . The cell-corner sum is therefore , which converges to the stated mean times integral.
The same tiling bounds the rescaling: each cell has by [F3], and at most cells meet when . Summing gives the asserted uniform bound.
The averaging result applied to every test gives convergence of pairings against that dense class. The uniform bound in step 1.2, together with , lets one approximate an arbitrary test by [F2] and pass the pairing limit. This proves weak convergence.
Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests
Definition
Let , let tend to zero, and let be bounded in . We say two-scale converges weakly to along if for every finite sum one has Here is the smooth -periodic class from Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space. The test definition is independent of how a finite sum is represented because both sides are linear in .
Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors
Statement
Assume are as in Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space. For each , the equation in Periodic scalar cell problem has a unique solution . The map is linear, and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is measurable with , the periodic cell equation, the cell Poincare inequality, Hilbert completeness and real Lax--Milgram under Countable Choice.
Periodic scalar cell problem: the unknown lies in and satisfies for all .
Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: is Hilbert in the gradient norm, and .
The Sobolev space is a Hilbert space: the periodic closure, and its closed mean-zero subspace, are Hilbert under the norm.
The Lax--Milgram theorem: a bounded coercive real bilinear form on a Hilbert space has a unique variational solution and the usual norm estimate.
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data: almost everywhere.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is the axiom used by the cited Hilbert and Lax--Milgram suppliers; no stronger choice axiom is invoked.
Proof
On with gradient inner product, define and . By [F5] and Cauchy--Schwarz, , , and . Thus [F2]–[F4] apply and give a unique with for every . Rearranging is exactly [F1].
Test the equation with . Then . If the gradient norm is zero the estimate is immediate; otherwise divide by it. The bound follows from [F2].
For and scalars , the function satisfies the cell equation with datum , by linearity of the integral in both and the corrector. Uniqueness in step 1.1 therefore gives .
Two-scale compactness for bounded L2 sequences
Statement
Let , let (monotonicity may be dropped; only is used), and suppose is bounded in . Then some subsequence two-scale converges in the sense of Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests to a function .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded real sequence, positive scales tending to zero, periodic rescaling, density of smooth product tests, Countable Choice, real Bolzano--Weierstrass, and Hilbert Riesz representation.
Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests: convergence is tested against finite sums of compactly supported smooth slow factors and smooth periodic fast factors.
Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube: for every fixed smooth product test , ; this follows by applying periodic averaging to .
Product rectangle kernels are dense in product L two, Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in , and The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: finite sums of smooth product tests are dense in .
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): a point can be selected from each member of a fixed countable family of nonempty sets; this will select the dense test family.
Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence: bounded real scalar sequences have convergent subsequences.
with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space and Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces: every bounded real linear functional on is integration against a unique function.
Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of for : the finite-measure product space is separable, consistently with the dense test family in [F3].
Proof
Let . By [F7], extend functions by zero to see that is separable; [F3] says the allowed test subspace is dense there. Intersect a countable base of its metric topology with that subspace and, using [F4], choose one point from every nonempty intersection. The rational span of these points is a countable dense family . For each fixed , Cauchy--Schwarz gives which is bounded by [F2]. For a bounded real sequence fix this extraction rule: let be the least positive integer bounding every , start with , bisect repeatedly, and retain the left closed half when it contains infinitely many terms, otherwise the right closed half. From the th retained interval take the term with least index larger than the previously selected index. Such indices exist; nestedness and vanishing interval lengths make the selected sequence Cauchy, and [F5] makes it convergent. This uniquely specified extraction map requires no choice. Enumerate , recursively apply this map to each scalar pairing on the current subsequence, and take as the th index of the th nested subsequence. The indices increase strictly and their tail lies in every fixed earlier subsequence, so all pairings with converge. Recursion of the specified map does not use Dependent Choice.
Denote the limit on by . For each , step 1.1 and [F2] give . Limits preserve rational linearity; the bound makes uniformly continuous, so it has a unique continuous extension to all of the real Hilbert space , with . To verify real homogeneity, first fix and , and choose rationals . Since , ; continuity and give . For arbitrary , choose with ; then , and continuity gives . Additivity also passes from by continuity, so is bounded and real-linear.
By [F6], choose such that . Fix any allowed smooth product test and choose with in product . Along the extracted subsequence, [F2] applied to gives Also . Since the pairings for converge to , letting proves convergence for to . This is precisely the two-scale convergence in [F1].
Periodic correctors and effective tensor
Definition
The library represents as functions on , with standard basis for (The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension ). For the usual PDE coordinate labels , write , set , write , and set in the multi-index convention of maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space. The same shift applies to vector and tensor components, so component label means library index . By Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors, let be the unique mean-zero solution of the periodic cell equation. Define and define the constant matrix by its columns: Equivalently, . All integrals are finite because and . This definition does not itself assert symmetry or ellipticity.
Remarks
Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor proves symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the tensor.
Two-scale structure of bounded H1-zero gradients
Statement
Let , with , and be bounded in . There are a subsequence, , and such that in , in , and Here vector-valued two-scale convergence means componentwise convergence as in Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests, and denotes product-measurable functions whose -slices lie in almost everywhere and whose squared slice norms are integrable over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded sequence in , positive scales , compact inclusion and separability on the cube, two-scale compactness, the periodic Poincare inequality, and Fourier completeness on the torus.
Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: is separable and Hilbert and its bounded sequences have -convergent subsequences.
A bounded sequence in a separable Hilbert space has a weakly convergent subsequence: bounded sequences in a separable Hilbert space have weakly convergent subsequences under Countable Choice.
Two-scale compactness for bounded L2 sequences and Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests: bounded scalar sequences have two-scale convergent subsequences along positive scales .
Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube: periodic rescalings are uniformly bounded and converge weakly to their cell means.
Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space and Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: is the mean-zero periodic closure and its gradient has zero cell mean.
The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: periodic Fourier characters form a complete orthonormal basis and Parseval holds.
Weak derivative of a locally integrable function: weak derivatives satisfy integration by parts against compactly supported smooth tests.
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: iterated integrals may be interchanged for the integrable products used below.
Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in : is dense in , so an function pairing to zero with every such test is zero almost everywhere.
The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps: for smooth and the sampling map , the chain rule differentiates in by .
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is the only choice axiom used in subsequence and countable-density selections.
Proof
By [F1]–[F2], first extract a subsequence converging weakly in to some , and then a further subsequence converging strongly in to the same . By [F3], extract successive further subsequences on which each of the components of two-scale converges; since there are finitely many components, one subsequence works for all. Write its vector limit as .
For every allowed product test , strong convergence and the uniform sampled-test bound in [F4] show that replacing by in its pairing changes the limit by zero. Weak averaging in [F4], applied to against , then gives limit . Thus the two-scale limit of is the -independent function .
Set . For a smooth compactly supported and constant vector , test gradient convergence componentwise with . Ordinary weak convergence gives . By Cauchy--Schwarz and Tonelli [F8], lies in and pairs to zero with every ; [F9] makes it zero almost everywhere.
Let be a smooth periodic vector field, compactly supported in , with , and put . By [F10], . The field is a valid compactly supported smooth test in the weak-derivative identity [F7], so . Taking limits by componentwise two-scale convergence for the two allowed tests and gives , where the last equality is weak integration by parts. Thus is orthogonal to every such divergence-free field.
For every nonzero and every real , use slow tests and in step 3.1. They are divergence-free in . The resulting pairings show that each real and imaginary component of pairs to zero with every , so [F9] makes it zero almost everywhere. There are countably many and a finite basis of each , so [A1] permits one null set outside which is parallel to for all ; the zero coefficient is zero by step 2.2.
For define and set . The parallel property from step 4.1 gives . Moreover , so Parseval [F6] and Tonelli [F8] give . For almost every , the sum is finite; the partial Fourier sums over are then Cauchy in by Parseval, and their limit belongs to because each partial sum is smooth periodic. The zero coefficient makes this limit mean-zero. Define as the product-space limit of these partial sums. Their -gradients converge there, and the coefficient identity identifies the gradient limit with . Conjugate symmetry makes the limit real, and the integrated estimate gives the stated square-integrable slice norm. Hence with , completing the decomposition.
Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor
Statement
Under the scalar periodic ellipticity hypotheses of Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data, the matrix of Periodic correctors and effective tensor is symmetric and satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The measurable periodic scalar coefficient satisfies , the mean-zero cell corrector exists uniquely, and periodic gradients have zero cell mean.
Periodic correctors and effective tensor: and is the mean-zero corrector.
Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: the corrector is linear in and satisfies the cell variational equation.
Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: for periodic functions; in particular .
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data: almost everywhere and .
Proof
Test the corrector equation for with . It gives . Interchanging gives . Thus where the first equality follows from [F1] after adding the zero term with , and the last integral is symmetric in . Hence is symmetric.
Taking in the same identity yields . Since the mean of is by [F3], Cauchy--Schwarz on the unit-measure cell gives . The lower coefficient bound in [F4] proves .
The cell equation makes the minimizer of over . Indeed, for , expansion gives , whose middle term is zero and last term is nonnegative. Taking the competitor gives .
Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes
Definition
This procedure defines a real-arithmetic finite-dimensional FE-HMM discretization. Its output is unless an ExactSolve call returns singular-system, in which case that token is returned; Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗ proves the exceptional branch is unreachable for the stated inputs. It makes no bit-complexity claim, no coefficient-oracle claim, and no claim about numerically computing its exact integral entries; those entries are the mathematical values of the displayed integrals. Fix and coefficient from Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data. Use the diagonal of the square from to as a two-triangle initial matching macro mesh. Label that shared diagonal in both triangles and each exterior edge . It is a compatible labeled mesh in the sense of Compatible 2D newest-vertex-bisection meshes. The macro input is any finite admissible descendant triangulation of this mesh. Its cells are closed affine triangles as in Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity.
Choose , a micro side length , , and a finite matching triangulation of the unit square whose opposite boundary edges and vertices match under translation by the PDE coordinate vectors of Periodic correctors and effective tensor. The periodic micro space is Here means an class with a continuous periodic piecewise-affine representative; the periodic closure condition identifies opposite traces. Thus is the finite-dimensional mean-zero subspace of the periodic P1 space, as proved in Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗. Let be the conforming zero-boundary continuous piecewise-affine macro space on , using Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh. Its inclusion in is supplied by Continuous matching piecewise polynomials belong to W1p and Zero-boundary conforming polynomials lie in W0 1p and satisfy Poincare.
Identify vertices of that match under the opposite-edge translations, and order the resulting periodic vertex classes by the lexicographically least representative of each class. Let be the continuous periodic P1 nodal functions for these classes, with at class and at the other classes. Set . If , use the empty basis of ; otherwise use as the ordered basis of . The nodal basis spans the full periodic P1 space, and these functions form a basis of its mean-zero subspace.
Use the following exact solver on the systems assembled below. Given a real matrix and , ExactSolve(A,b) returns the empty vector if . Otherwise use temporary solver labels , with solver coordinate corresponding to library coordinate of (The vector space of all functions with pointwise operations, and as the case ), and form the augmented matrix . For , choose the least row index whose current entry in column is nonzero; if there is no such row, return singular-system. Swap the entire augmented rows and . For each , set , replace the entire augmented row by row , and set its column- entry to zero. After this loop, compute in order by
using entries of the resulting upper-triangular augmented matrix. Return the vector whose library coordinate equals . All arithmetic and zero tests are exact over ; the systems assembled below are positive definite.
Order macro triangles by lexicographic order of their barycenters. For each such , use its barycenter as the single quadrature point with positive weight , and set
The affine change-of-variables theorem A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions makes this a measurable coefficient class independent of the representative of , with almost everywhere. For each PDE coordinate vector of Periodic correctors and effective tensor, in order , assemble
over the micro-basis indices . If that basis is empty, set ; otherwise call ExactSolve(G^K,r^K_{\cdot,j}), index its returned coordinates by , and set . Then set
If the micro call returns singular-system, propagate that output; Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗ proves this branch is not reached. Otherwise identify solver index with micro-basis index for and use the returned coefficient as in the displayed sum. The singular-system branch is included to make the solver instruction total.
Order the interior vertices of lexicographically and let be the corresponding nodal basis of . If , set . Otherwise assemble
call ExactSolve(H,F). If it returns singular-system, propagate that output; the well-posedness lemma proves this branch is not reached. Otherwise set , with solver index identified with macro-basis index . This basis system is exactly the variational system
The macro matrix is positive definite and its singular-system branch is unreachable by Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗. Output . The centroid quadrature is positive and exact for constants, which is the only quadrature property used in the error theorem.
Interface
The local continuum comparator uses the same coefficient on the unit micro cell with the full periodic space ; it is defined and proved well posed in Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗. The period ratio is . No accuracy is asserted for arbitrary ; micro approximation and sampling/resonance are separated in FE-HMM macro, micro, and sampling error separation.
No sampling resonance for period-aligned periodic micro cells
Statement
For any dimension , phase , and positive integer , let on . Let be the unique mean-zero minimizer of and define . Then for every . Thus a micro side length has zero continuum sampling/resonance error, regardless of phase; a separate finite micro-space error can remain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is scalar, measurable, -periodic, uniformly elliptic; is its mean-zero exact corrector; the local periodic-coupling cell space is .
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: if is a positive integer, then is a measurable, unit-periodic coefficient with the same ellipticity bounds; pullback preserves the a.e. periodicity and bounds.
Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: solves the cell equation and is the mean corrector flux.
Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: subtracting the mean fixes the potential without changing its gradient, and mean-zero periodic gradients integrate to zero.
The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: Fourier expansions and Parseval are valid for periodic fluxes.
Affine pullback of weak derivatives and Sobolev seminorms: affine pullback preserves membership and applies the weak chain rule to the periodic corrector.
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: the phase-shifted affine pullback preserves measurable classes and transforms nonnegative integrals by its determinant; signed integrals follow by positive and negative parts.
Proof
Since for each , periodicity of gives a.e.; the exceptional null sets pull back to null sets by [F6]. Bounds are preserved by the same affine pullback [F1]. Hence the generic cell-corrector result [F2] applies to and gives its unique mean-zero cell solution; energy expansion around that solution shows it is the unique minimizer in the Statement. Set , where is its mean on . Periodic smooth approximants to converge on every bounded union of cells, and affine pullback [F5] shows with . The flux is periodic and divergence-free by the cell equation. Test the cell equation with the mean-zero real and imaginary parts of for . Their gradients are the corresponding parts of , so combining the two zero identities gives (and the identity is automatic at ). For a Fourier polynomial, has only frequencies , with coefficients multiplied by phases, and each remains perpendicular to ; hence it is divergence-free. For any periodic , affine change of variables [F6] gives . The latter box meets at most unit lattice cells, so periodicity bounds this by . Thus composition with is bounded on periodic , and the divergence-free identity passes from Fourier polynomials to in . Therefore for every smooth periodic , and by density for every . Uniqueness of the cell solution for identifies it with .
The sampled tensor flux is . By [F6], applied to the positive and negative parts of each component, this equals . The box is a union, up to null boundaries, of cells with integer , so periodicity makes each cell integral equal to . A translated unit cell has the same integral as : partition it at the integer coordinate faces and translate each resulting piece by an integer lattice vector into ; applying [F6] to positive and negative parts and using periodicity gives equality componentwise. Thus the average is . This holds for all , so the sampled tensor is exactly .
One-dimensional nonaligned micro sampling resonance bound
Statement
In one dimension, let be measurable, -periodic, and satisfy . For a phase and ratio , let solve for every , and define . Then and No dimension-independent bound for the unaligned case is claimed here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measurable one-dimensional periodic scalar coefficient with , and periodic mean-zero corrector problems for both the original and sampled coefficient.
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: is periodic, almost everywhere, and the affine sampled coefficient is a well-defined measurable class with the same bounds.
Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: is the mean flux of the exact mean-zero cell corrector.
Periodic scalar cell problem: the mean-zero periodic coupling tests against every periodic fluctuation; a constant flux therefore solves the cell equation.
Periodic L2 weak derivative on the circle, Fourier coefficients of a periodic weak derivative, and The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: a periodic weak derivative has Fourier coefficients , and Parseval holds.
Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: the bounded triangular integrand in the primitive calculation can be integrated in either order.
Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: every periodic derivative has zero cell integral.
Proof
For either or , define and . The ellipticity bounds make , and . Put . For every smooth periodic , Fubini [F5] gives , so is its periodic weak derivative. By [F4], the symmetric Fourier partial sums of are real trigonometric polynomials and converge in , since both and are in and their Fourier coefficients satisfy the weak-derivative relation; after subtracting its mean, the limit belongs to by the closure definition. Since almost everywhere, for every we have by [F6]. Thus it solves the cell equation. If two mean-zero solutions existed, testing their difference equation by the difference would give ; the periodic Poincare inequality [F6] then makes their difference zero. This proves both harmonic-mean formulas, including the nonperiodic-in- sampled coefficient under periodic coupling.
Put and . Write with integer and . Periodicity gives so . Since , both and lie in , hence . In particular the weaker bound holds. Also . Therefore as claimed.
Periodic scalar Dirichlet homogenization on the unit cube
Statement
Let , let be a measurable -periodic scalar coefficient with , and let . For let be the unique weak solution Let be the unique solution with from Periodic correctors and effective tensor in place of . Then as , in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The measurable periodic scalar ellipticity bounds, the corrector cell equation, two-scale compactness and gradient decomposition, periodic averaging, Lax--Milgram, and Countable Choice.
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data: is measurable and periodic, , and the physical coefficient is .
Periodic scalar cell problem, Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors, and Periodic correctors and effective tensor: the mean-zero corrector exists uniquely, depends linearly on its vector argument, and defines the flux average .
Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor: is symmetric and .
Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: is Hilbert, separable, satisfies , and bounded sequences are compact in .
The Lax--Milgram theorem: bounded coercive forms on a Hilbert space have unique weak solutions.
Two-scale structure of bounded H1-zero gradients: along any with , a bounded sequence has a subsequence with two-scale gradient limit and in .
Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube and The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: periodic rescalings have uniform bounds and weak cell-mean limits, and Fourier characters are complete in periodic .
Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure: is the norm closure of , so the homogenized variational identity extends from compactly supported smooth tests.
Weak topology on a normed space: weak convergence is convergence under every bounded linear functional.
Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space and The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: is the closure of smooth periodic functions, is its zero-mean subspace, and Parseval applies to each smooth periodic function and its first derivatives; step 1.2 proves the required rational trigonometric density from these facts.
Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in : is dense in .
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: the section integrals used to define are measurable and obey the iterated-integral identities for the integrable products below.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice supplies the subsequences and the countable dense trigonometric test family; neither full Choice nor Dependent Choice is used.
Proof
Equip with gradient norm, equivalent to its Sobolev norm by [F4]. The form is bounded by and coercive with constant ; is bounded by . Thus [F5] gives a unique . The same argument using [F3] gives a unique . Testing with gives (with the zero-gradient case immediate).
For smooth periodic mean-zero , let be its Fourier coefficients and . Periodic integration by parts gives . Parseval [F10], applied to and all its first derivatives, yields The zero coefficient vanishes, and the symmetric truncation preserves reality. For each finite truncation, approximate its finitely many coefficients by rational real and imaginary parts while imposing ; this gives a countable family of rational-coefficient, real, mean-zero trigonometric polynomials dense in the smooth periodic mean-zero functions in . If , choose a smooth periodic arbitrarily close to in by [F10], then replace by ; since , this subtraction still approximates . The rational polynomials are therefore dense in all of .
Fix any sequence . Apply [F6] to the bounded solutions. Along a subsequence, in , strongly in , and two-scale converges to for . It remains to identify .
Fix and a smooth periodic . The oscillating test lies in and has gradient . The last term contributes a quantity tending to zero by boundedness of and the uniform rescaling bound [F7]. On the other terms, two-scale convergence gives where the test may contain the measurable factor : approximate each times a smooth periodic factor in by smooth Fourier sums and use the uniform rescaling bound [F7] and boundedness of . The right side converges because in .
Set in step 3.1 and let be arbitrary. For each smooth periodic , this gives , where For almost every , Cauchy--Schwarz in gives The right side belongs to because and . The absolute value of the integrand is integrable on , so Tonelli applied to its positive and negative parts gives measurability of the section integral [F12]. Thus . Since its pairing with every vanishes, density [F11] implies almost everywhere.
Use [A1] to take one common full-measure set for the countable dense family from step 1.2, and intersect it with the full-measure set where and is defined. For each such , the cell functional is continuous in the norm, so the equation extends from that dense family to every . Uniqueness in [F2] yields in .
Now use step 3.1 with . Step 5.1 and the flux definition [F2] identify its averaged flux as . Therefore for every . Density [F8] and boundedness of the form extend this to all test functions in , so uniqueness in [F5] gives .
Every sequence has a subsequence weakly converging to by steps 2.1–6.1. If the family failed to converge weakly to , [F9] would give a bounded linear functional and a sequence whose scalar values stay a fixed positive distance from its value at ; the subsequence just obtained contradicts that. Thus the full weak convergence holds.
Antisymmetric periodic flux potential
Statement
For each column , define the mean-zero periodic flux . There is a mean-zero periodic tensor such that and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The periodic cell corrector and effective tensor, the cell equation, mean-zero gradient property, divergence-free corrector flux, and Fourier basis/Parseval on the torus.
Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: is in and has zero mean.
Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: for every periodic mean-zero ; by subtracting constants it holds for every smooth periodic .
The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: Fourier characters are complete and Parseval identifies norms with coefficient sums.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is assumed by the Fourier supplier [F3]; no stronger choice axiom is used here. Fourier coefficients are integrals of classes against bounded characters and are invariant under changes on null sets.
Proof
For each smooth periodic scalar , [F2] gives , so distributionally. Its mean is zero by the definition of in [F1]. Testing with the real and imaginary parts of therefore gives, for every nonzero Fourier mode , , and .
For define Then and by step 1.1. Also , so . By [F3], the symmetric Fourier partial sums and each of their first derivatives are Cauchy in , since differentiation multiplies the coefficients by . Their limits satisfy the weak-derivative identity by passing to the limit in integration by parts against smooth tests. Thus the partial sums converge in to a tensor in the periodic closure, with zero mean and the asserted norm bound. The coefficient identity and completeness [F3] give its divergence ; conjugate symmetry makes it real.
Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves
Statement
For every macro cell in Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes, the coefficient satisfies . For each , both the full cell problem on and its restriction to have unique solutions and . The tensors
are symmetric and satisfy . Consequently the macro FE-HMM system in the algorithm has a unique solution. The exact Gaussian-elimination calls specified there terminate without the singular-system branch and return the unique solutions of the assembled micro and macro variational systems.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The coefficient bound, full periodic cell space, finite-dimensional periodic P1 subspace, periodic gradients of mean zero, zero-boundary macro space, and real Lax--Milgram.
Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes: consists of mean-zero periodic classes with continuous piecewise-affine representatives, and .
Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space and Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: is a Hilbert space in the gradient norm and for every .
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: affine pullback preserves coefficient measurability, null sets, and the bounds , hence almost everywhere.
The Lax--Milgram theorem: bounded coercive bilinear forms on Hilbert spaces have unique solutions.
Continuous matching piecewise polynomials belong to W1p and Zero-boundary conforming polynomials lie in W0 1p and satisfy Poincare: the finite macro space is contained in .
Forward and backward substitution are correct, unique, and quadratic in scalar operations: backward substitution on a real upper-triangular matrix with nonzero diagonal returns its unique solution in finitely many steps.
Gauss–Green formula on an affine simplex and Interior facet orientations cancel in a matching mesh: cellwise integration by parts holds and matching interior-facet terms cancel.
The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: trigonometric polynomials are complete in and Parseval holds componentwise.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): the periodic Sobolev and Hilbert conventions use Countable Choice; no stronger axiom is required here.
Proof
Every continuous periodic P1 nodal hat on is in by the conforming piecewise-polynomial theorem in [F5]. For each coordinate and Fourier mode , apply [F8] on each triangle to . Interior-edge terms cancel by matching traces; opposite boundary-edge terms cancel because is periodic and is integral. Thus . Parseval [F9] applied to and its two weak derivatives shows that symmetric Fourier partial sums converge in ; they are real smooth periodic trigonometric polynomials, so . The periodic nodal hats form a basis of the full periodic P1 space because a continuous P1 function is determined by its nodal values, with opposite-edge vertices identified. Each hat is nonnegative and positive on an incident triangle, so . A nodal combination has zero mean exactly when ; solving this constraint for shows that the defined in the algorithm form a basis of (and when that space is zero). For fixed , on define and . The bounds [F3] give , , and . By [F2], [F4] gives a unique solution . The finite-dimensional gradient inner product is positive definite on because it is a subspace of the mean-zero space ; hence it is complete and the same boundedness and coercivity estimates give the unique by [F4]. Testing its equation with each basis function gives exactly the matrix system from the algorithm. Its matrix is symmetric positive definite since, for each nonzero coefficient vector, the corresponding in has .
Each solution is linear in by uniqueness. For either space or , the variational equation says minimizes over : expanding at the solution cancels the cross term and leaves . For , testing the equation with shows so the tensor is symmetric. Since by [F2], Jensen gives ; the competitor zero gives it at most .
The interior macro nodal functions listed in the algorithm form a basis of , since a conforming P1 function is determined by its vertex values and the boundary values are fixed to zero. By [F5] the macro space is a finite-dimensional subspace of . For , [F1] and step 2.1 imply This is positive for every nonzero ; [F6] ensures the gradient seminorm is a norm on . The load is bounded by . Thus finite-dimensional Lax--Milgram [F4] gives a unique macro solution; if the space is zero, its sole element is the unique solution by definition. Testing with each interior nodal function gives and , so is equivalent to the macro variational equation. In particular is symmetric positive definite. The micro and macro systems are therefore nonsingular.
Consider any matrix passed to ExactSolve; steps 1.1 and 3.1 show it is real, symmetric, positive definite, and hence nonsingular. After elimination stages its coefficient matrix is row-equivalent to and has block form , where is upper triangular with nonzero diagonal. The full matrix and are nonsingular, so is nonsingular: otherwise a nonzero with and the solution of would give a nonzero kernel vector . Thus the first column of has a nonzero entry, and the prescribed least-row search finds a pivot. Row swaps and row additions preserve the solution set; after finitely many stages the system is upper triangular with nonzero diagonal. Back substitution is finite and correct by [F7], so ExactSolve terminates without its singular branch and returns the unique solution of the assembled matrix equation. The micro systems in step 1.1 are exactly the restricted cell variational equations on a basis; the macro system in step 3.1 is exactly the macro variational equation on a basis. This proves the solver assertion for both.
Strong L2 convergence in periodic Dirichlet homogenization
Statement
Under the hypotheses and notation of Periodic scalar Dirichlet homogenization on the unit cube, strongly in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The periodic weak solutions satisfy the oscillatory equation, every weak cluster limit is , and the cube embedding is compact.
Periodic scalar Dirichlet homogenization on the unit cube: in and hence weakly in .
Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: every bounded sequence has a strongly -convergent subsequence.
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: testing the oscillatory equation with and using a.e. and gives (with the zero-gradient case immediate).
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): subsequence selections use Countable Choice.
Proof
Suppose strong convergence failed. Then some and sequence satisfy for every . Testing the oscillatory weak equation with and using [F3] gives a uniform bound: if , divide by that norm, and if it is zero the bound is immediate. By [F2] and [A1], a subsequence converges strongly in to some . Its weak limit is also by [F1], so uniqueness of weak limits in the Hilbert space gives . This contradicts the lower bound .
The contradiction proves as .
Boundary-cutoff corrector estimate for regular periodic data
Statement
Let , be scalar and periodic, and let . For each , let solve the oscillatory weak equation with coefficient , and suppose solves the homogenized equation with the same datum . For choose a Lipschitz cutoff equal to zero where , equal to one where that distance is at least , and with . Define Then and, for a constant independent of , The constant may depend on , the fixed corrector and flux-potential norms, , and the cutoff profile. No rate is asserted without this regularity and periodicity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The periodic correctors and flux potentials, solving the constant-coefficient equation, scalar ellipticity, and a cutoff supported away from the boundary.
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: is a well-defined measurable class and almost everywhere.
Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: solves the cell equation and .
Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor: is symmetric elliptic, and the given satisfies .
Antisymmetric periodic flux potential: with and .
Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube: periodic rescalings have uniformly bounded norm for .
Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: for and is dense in that space.
The Lax--Milgram theorem: the oscillatory coercive weak equation has a unique solution in .
Affine pullback of weak derivatives and Sobolev seminorms: affine rescaling of a periodic function is locally and obeys the weak chain rule; periodic smooth approximants converge on every bounded union of cells.
Compactly supported H1 functions lie in H1_0: an function that vanishes almost everywhere outside a compact subset of belongs to .
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): periodic Sobolev representatives use the declared Countable Choice convention.
Proof
Let for , for , and linear on , and set . Distance to a closed set is -Lipschitz, so this cutoff has the required gradient bound. Set with . For each corrector, its defining smooth periodic approximants converge in on any bounded union of period cells, since that union meets only finitely many cells. Applying the affine pullback rule [F8] with shows with weak gradient . Multiplication by preserves : apply the classical product rule to the smooth periodic approximants and pass in , using the boundedness of and . The cutoff correction is an function supported in the compact set ; [F9] puts it in , so . Existence and uniqueness of follow from [F7]. Differentiating the uncut expression by the weak chain and product rules gives Subtract the homogenized weak equation for .
Extend each periodic potential to the bounded region as the limit of its smooth periodic approximants; the finite-cell bound gives convergence there. For , [F8] gives in distributions. The product is with compact support, so [F9] places it in and the distributional identity extends to this test by density. Integration by parts and antisymmetry of cancel the term containing , since the Hessian is symmetric; the remaining term is Approximate the periodic potential by smooth periodic functions and pass in . By [F5] and boundedness of , this has magnitude at most . The last flux term in step 1.1 has the same bound by [F1], [F5], and boundedness of . Density in [F6] extends the residual estimate to every : .
Let . It is covered by at most cubes of the lattice : along each of the faces there are at most a fixed number of normal layers and at most tangential cells. Each cell contributes at most to . Thus for every periodic . Applying this to and , and differentiating , gives : the three product-rule terms are bounded respectively by , , and .
The residual for is the residual for plus . By [F1], steps 2.1 and 2.2, its magnitude is at most . Put and test the difference equation with . Coercivity gives so (trivial if it vanishes). Finally [F6] gives , while has norm at most by [F5]. The triangle inequality proves both claimed bounds.
Energy identity for FE-HMM micro tensor error
Statement
For a fixed macro sample in Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes, let be its sampled coefficient, the full periodic cell solution, and its micro P1 solution from Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves. Set . Then and for any , In particular , where and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The full and finite periodic cell equations use the same scalar coefficient , the micro space is a subspace of , and both solutions are unique.
Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes: and the full/discrete sampled equations use the same .
Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves: both cell solutions exist uniquely and their tensor energy representation is symmetric.
Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: the cell variational equation holds for every test in .
Proof
Write . Subtracting the two variational equations gives for every . Thus is orthogonal in the gradient inner product to the whole micro space. For any , which proves the best-approximation inequality.
For , the symmetric energy representation in [F2] and the full/discrete equations imply Indeed, expanding the two energy bilinear forms leaves this term; each cross term vanishes by testing the full equation with the difference in or the discrete equation with a micro function in . Taking proves the identity. For unit , Cauchy--Schwarz bounds the right side by by step 1.1. The supremum over unit vectors is the operator norm, giving the final bound.
FE-HMM macro, micro, and sampling error separation
Statement
Let be the FE-HMM solution from Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes on a matching macro triangulation of , and let solve the homogenized equation with coefficient . For each macro cell let be the exact periodic-coupling sampled tensor and its discrete micro tensor. Define and . If , then The first term is macro best approximation; the second is explicitly split by and . By Energy identity for FE-HMM micro tensor error, . If every micro ratio is an integer, No sampling resonance for period-aligned periodic micro cells gives . The condition is a sufficient perturbation condition; no arbitrary-scale accuracy is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite conforming macro mesh of the unit square, its continuous zero-boundary P1 space, positive cell weights summing to area, uniformly elliptic symmetric local micro tensors, a homogenized solution, and the exact sampled tensors.
Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes: and the macro equation has right side .
Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves: each is symmetric and -elliptic; the macro system has a unique solution.
No sampling resonance for period-aligned periodic micro cells: integer period ratios give .
Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor: is symmetric with .
Compatible 2D newest-vertex-bisection meshes and Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity: the selected macro triangulation is finite, conforming, and covers with disjoint cell interiors.
Continuous matching piecewise polynomials belong to W1p and Zero-boundary conforming polynomials lie in W0 1p and satisfy Poincare: ; Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube gives a norm controlled by the gradient.
Proof
By [F2] the macro solution and all local tensors are well defined. Write and . The triangle inequality gives . For macro functions , piecewise constancy of their P1 gradients and Cauchy--Schwarz over the finite cells imply By [F5] the reference form is at least , so [F1] and also give .
Fix any and put . Since both macro and homogenized equations have the same load, for every test in , The right side has magnitude at most by [F5] and step 1.1. Combining with coercivity in step 1.1 and gives This also holds if , when division is unnecessary.
Take a sequence whose approximation errors decrease to ; finite-dimensionality ensures the infimum is finite, and the displayed inequality passes to the limit. The two coefficient functions are increasing for , so replace by to obtain the stated estimate. Finally, the exact decomposition gives the separate micro and resonance terms, with their micro-space and aligned-sampling interpretations from [F3]–[F4].
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.