Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 16 results · all verified · 8 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 8 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Homogenization, multiscale FEM and heterogeneous media

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page treats measurable, uniformly elliptic scalar coefficients that are periodic on the unit lattice. It defines the mean-zero periodic cell space, proves cell solvability and the symmetric uniformly elliptic effective tensor, then establishes two-scale compactness and identifies the weak Dirichlet homogenized limit on the unit cube. Strong L2 convergence follows from a locally proved Fourier compactness argument. A quantitative first-order corrector estimate is stated only for C2 homogenized solutions and includes an explicit boundary cutoff and antisymmetric flux potential.

The multiscale discretization branch is FE-HMM on a square in two dimensions. It uses an admissible newest-vertex-bisection macro triangulation, continuous zero-boundary P1 macro functions, periodic P1 micro functions, barycenter samples, and exact cell integrals. The local proof separates the macro best-approximation error, finite micro-space error, and continuum sampling/resonance error. Integer-aligned periods remove only the resonance term; the one-dimensional nonaligned calculation exhibits a nonzero sampling error. No general accuracy claim is made for arbitrary scale ratios or nonperiodic coefficients.

Macro and micro sampling convention

In the schematic, K is one closed macro triangle and xK its barycenter. The translated micro square xK+δY has lower corner xK and center xK+δ(1/2,1/2). Opposite micro edges are identified for the fluctuation space; the colored edges and arrows show matching traces under translations by δe1 and δe2. The coefficient in rescaled micro coordinates is bK(y)=a(xK/ϵ+(δ/ϵ)y). The drawing illustrates the data layout only; every equation and error bound is proved in the item text.

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.0, line cap=round, line join=round]
  \draw[thick] (0,0) -- (3.4,0) -- (0,2.5) -- cycle;
  \node at (0.85,0.95) {$K$};
  \fill[red] (1.13,0.83) circle (2pt);
  \node[red, below right] at (1.13,0.83) {$x_K$};
  \draw[dashed,gray] (1.13,0.83) -- (4.3,1.35);
  \draw[thick,blue] (4.5,0.45) rectangle (6.9,2.85);
  \node at (5.7,1.55) {$x_K+\delta Y$};
  \draw[->,blue,thick] (4.75,0.25) -- (6.55,0.25);
  \draw[->,blue,thick] (7.15,0.7) -- (7.15,2.5);
  \draw[<-,blue,thick] (4.75,3.05) -- (6.55,3.05);
  \draw[<-,blue,thick] (4.25,0.7) -- (4.25,2.5);
  \node[blue] at (5.65,-0.05) {$\delta e_1$};
  \node[blue,rotate=90] at (7.45,1.65) {$\delta e_2$};
  \node at (5.7,3.35) {periodic P1 fluctuation};
\end{tikzpicture}

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data

Definition

Fix an integer d≥1 and the unit cell Y=(0,1)d with Lebesgue measure ∣Y∣=1. Assume Countable Choice for the L2 conventions of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). A uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion coefficient is a measurable real function a:Rd→R such that a(y+k)=a(y) for almost every y and every k∈Zd, and there are constants 0<λ≤Λ<∞ with λ≤a(y)≤Λ almost everywhere on Y. Coefficients are identified when they agree almost everywhere.

For ϵ>0, the physical scalar coefficient is aϵ(x)=a(x/ϵ) and the associated matrix is aϵ(x)Id. The bounded-domain branch used on this page is Ω=(0,1)d with homogeneous zero boundary values. Its weak equation for datum f∈L2(Ω;R) is ∫Ωa(x/ϵ)∇uϵ⋅∇v dx=∫Ωfv dx(v∈H01(Ω;R)). No coefficient regularity beyond measurability and the displayed bounds is part of this definition.

For every ϵ>0, the map x↦x/ϵ is a C1 diffeomorphism of Rd. By A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, its pullback preserves Lebesgue measurability and takes null-set changes to null-set changes (apply the theorem also to the inverse map). Thus aϵ is a well-defined almost-everywhere class independent of the representative of a. The same result applies to every affine translation and positive dilation used in periodic sampling below, so almost-everywhere coefficient bounds are preserved under those pullbacks.

The ellipticity bounds hold almost everywhere on all of Rd, not just on Y: periodicity transfers the exceptional null set from Y to each lattice translate, translations preserve null sets by the same change-of-variables theorem, and the countably many translates cover Rd up to their null boundaries.

Axiom use

Countable Choice is inherited through the real and complex L2 and Sobolev class conventions. No Axiom of Choice or Dependent Choice is asserted here.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space

Definition

Fix d≥1, Y=(0,1)d, and Countable Choice for the Sobolev conventions of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Let C#∞(Y) be the restrictions to Y of smooth Zd-periodic real functions on Rd. Define H#1(Y):=C#∞(Y)‾ H1(Y),V#:={v∈H#1(Y):∫Yv dy=0}. The integral is the normalized cell mean because ∣Y∣=1. Derivatives are weak derivatives on Y and the periodic condition is the closure convention in this definition; no pointwise boundary trace is being imposed. Equip V# with the inherited H1 norm.

Remarks

The cell Poincaré inequality on this exact mean-zero space is proved in Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell. Its conclusion makes ∥∇v∥L2(Y) an equivalent complete norm on V#.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and let Q=(0,1)d, d≥1. Then H01(Q;R) is a separable real Hilbert space. It satisfies ∥v∥L2(Q)≤∥∂0v∥L2(Q)≤∥∇v∥L2(Q)(v∈H01(Q)). Moreover, every sequence bounded in H01(Q) has a subsequence converging in L2(Q). These conclusions use Countable Choice only; no Axiom of Choice or Dependent Choice is needed in the proof below.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the unit cube Q, and the Sobolev-closure convention for H01(Q).

[F1]

Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure: H01(Q) is the H1-norm closure of Cc∞(Q), and Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms gives ∥v∥H12=∥v∥22+∑i<d∥∂iv∥22; coordinate derivatives are indexed by 0≤i<d (Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).

[F2]

The Sobolev space H1 is a Hilbert space: under Countable Choice, H1(Q) is Hilbert and H01(Q) is its closed Hilbert subspace.

[F3]

Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of Lp(Rn) for 1≤p<∞: rational box-step functions give a countable dense family in L2(Rd).

[F4]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: on a finite torus, Fourier characters are a complete orthonormal basis and Parseval holds.

[F5]

Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence.

[F7]

Affine pullback of weak derivatives and Sobolev seminorms and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: affine rescaling preserves Sobolev membership, transforms weak derivatives by the affine chain rule, and changes L2 integrals by its determinant.

Proof

1.1F1F6algebra

Let v∈Cc∞(Q) and write x=(t,x′) with first library coordinate t=x0 and x′=(x1,…,xd−1) (the empty tuple when d=1). For fixed x′ and 0<t<1, the one-dimensional fundamental theorem gives v(t,x′)=∫0t∂0v(s,x′) ds. Cauchy--Schwarz and t≤1 imply ∣v(t,x′)∣2≤∫01∣∂0v(s,x′)∣2 ds. Integrating first in t and then in x′ gives ∥v∥22≤∥∂0v∥22. By [F1], approximating any v∈H01(Q) in H1 and passing to the limit proves the displayed Poincaré bound.

1.2F1F3F2algebra

The map J:H1(Q)→L2(Q)d+1, J(v)=(v,∂0v,…,∂d−1v), is an isometry for the Sobolev norm by [F1]. The target is separable: extend each coordinate by zero to Rd and restrict the countable dense rational-box family [F3]. The image J(H1(Q)) and its subset J(H01(Q)) are separable subspaces of a second-countable metric space: intersect a countable base with the subspace and choose one point from each nonempty basic set, a countable selection allowed by Countable Choice. Thus H01(Q) is separable.

1.3F1F4algebra

For v∈Cc∞(Q), extend it by zero to D=(−1,2)d and identify opposite faces of D to obtain a smooth function on the torus of side length 3. The extension preserves the H1 norms. By [F1], for every v∈H01(Q) choose test functions converging to v in H1; their periodic zero extensions are Cauchy in H1 on this torus, so the extension is in periodic H1(D) and the same norm bound holds.

2.1F4F7step 1.3F1algebra

Rescale D affinely to the unit torus using [F7]; the characters on the side-length-3 torus are e2πik⋅x/3. For a periodic H1(D) function V, integration by parts on smooth periodic approximants and passage in H1 give ∂jV^(k)=(2πikj/3)V^(k) for 0≤j<d. The zero extension in step 1.3 is supported away from the identified faces, so its weak derivatives on the torus are exactly its zero-extended weak derivatives on Q. Parseval [F4] therefore yields ∑k∈Zd(1+∣k∣2)∣V^(k)∣2≤Cd∥V∥H1(D)2, with a fixed constant accounting for the side length 3. Hence for every integer N≥1, ∑∣k∣>N∣V^(k)∣2≤CdN−2∥V∥H1(D)2.

3.1step 1.3F5step 2.1F4algebra∎

Let (vn) be bounded in H01(Q), and write Vn for the periodic zero extensions from step 1.3. For each fixed Fourier mode k, the complex coefficients are bounded, so their real and imaginary parts are bounded real sequences. Use the following fixed extraction rule for any bounded real sequence (bn): let m be the least positive integer bounding all ∣bn∣, start with [−m,m], and bisect repeatedly, keeping the left closed half if it contains infinitely many terms and otherwise the right closed half. At stage r take the least index larger than the previous index whose term lies in the retained interval. Each such index exists, and the selected terms are Cauchy because the intervals are nested with lengths tending to zero; [F5] then implies they converge. This defines a unique subsequence from the input sequence, without choice. Enumerate the real and imaginary parts of the Fourier modes, recursively apply this fixed rule to the current subsequence for the next coordinate, and let nr be the rth index of the rth nested subsequence. These diagonal indices increase strictly and form a tail subsequence of every fixed earlier extraction, so every coefficient converges; this recursion uses a specified function, not Dependent Choice. If its terms are Vnr,Vns, then for fixed N the sum of squared coefficient differences over ∣k∣≤N tends to zero as r,s→∞, while by step 2.1 the sum over ∣k∣>N is at most CN−2 uniformly in r,s. First choose N large, then r,s large; Parseval shows (Vnr) is Cauchy in L2(D). Completeness gives an L2(D) limit, and restriction to Q gives the required L2(Q) convergence.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Periodic scalar cell problem

Definition

For coefficient a, cell Y, and zero-mean periodic space V# from Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space, and for p∈Rd, the weak periodic cell equation asks for χp∈V# such that ∫Ya(y)(p+∇yχp(y))⋅∇yv(y) dy=0(v∈V#). The sign convention is p+∇yχp; the zero-mean condition fixes the additive constant. This definition alone asserts neither existence nor uniqueness.

Remarks

Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors supplies existence, uniqueness, linearity, and energy bounds for this definition.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell

Statement

Let Y=(0,1)d and V# be the mean-zero periodic H1 space of Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space. Then every v∈V# satisfies ∥v∥L2(Y)≤d ∥∇v∥L2(Y), and every v∈H#1(Y) satisfies ∫Y∇v=0. Consequently ∥∇v∥2 is a complete norm on V# equivalent to its inherited H1 norm.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Y=(0,1)d, the closure definition of H#1(Y) and V#, Countable Choice, coordinatewise FTC, integral Cauchy--Schwarz, and Tonelli.

[F1]

Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space: H#1(Y) is the H1 closure of smooth periodic functions; V# is its closed subspace of functions with integral zero.

[F3]

Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases: Cauchy--Schwarz bounds an integral over an interval of length at most one.

[F4]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: the unit-cube integrals can be evaluated by iterated integration.

[F5]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is the declared background for the Sobolev closure conventions.

[F6]

Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space: coordinate derivatives on Rd are indexed by 0≤i<d, and ∇v=(∂iv)i<d.

[F7]

The Sobolev space H1 is a Hilbert space: under Countable Choice, the real Sobolev space H1(Y) is Hilbert and hence complete in its inherited norm.

Proof

1.1F2F1F3F6algebra

For smooth periodic v and each coordinate 0≤i<d, opposite-face values agree, so integrating that coordinate derivative over Y and applying the one-dimensional FTC [F2] gives ∫Y∂iv=0. Approximate an arbitrary v∈H#1(Y) in H1 by smooth periodic functions using [F1]; convergence of the derivatives in L2(Y) implies convergence of their integrals by [F3] and ∣Y∣=1. Thus every component of ∫Y∇v is zero.

1.2F3F4F6algebra

For smooth periodic v, write m=∫Yv(y) dy. For x,y∈Y, telescope from y to x one coordinate at a time, in order 0,…,d−1. The ith difference is the integral of ∂iv along a segment of length at most one, with the earlier coordinates fixed at x and later coordinates fixed at y. Cauchy--Schwarz [F3] bounds its square by the integral of ∣∂iv∣2 along the full unit coordinate interval. The inequality ∣∑i<dbi∣2≤d∑i<d∣bi∣2 and Tonelli [F4], integrating in x and y, then give ∫Y∫Y∣v(x)−v(y)∣2 dy dx≤d∑i<d∥∂iv∥22. For each x, Jensen's inequality gives ∣v(x)−m∣2=∣∫Y(v(x)−v(y))dy∣2≤∫Y∣v(x)−v(y)∣2dy. Integrating in x proves the stated inequality for smooth periodic mean-zero v.

2.1F5step 1.2F1F3F7algebra∎

Approximate any v∈V# in H1 by smooth periodic vn using Countable Choice [F5]. Their means converge to zero by Cauchy--Schwarz, so vn−∫Yvn are smooth periodic mean-zero functions converging to v in H1. Passing to the limit in step 1.2 proves the inequality on V#. By [F7], H1(Y) is complete. Its closure-defined subspace H#1(Y) is closed, and the mean is continuous by ∣∫Yv∣≤∥v∥2≤∥v∥H1, so V# is closed in H1(Y). Every H1-Cauchy sequence in V# therefore has an ambient limit in V#, proving completeness of its inherited norm. The inequality shows the gradient norm and H1 norm are equivalent, hence the gradient norm is complete too.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube

Statement

Let Y=(0,1)d, Q=(0,1)d, g∈L1(Y) be extended Zd-periodically, and φ∈Cc1(Q). As ϵ↓0, ∫Qφ(x)g(x/ϵ) dx⟶(∫Yg)(∫Qφ). If g∈L2(Y) and 0<ϵ≤1, then ∥g(⋅/ϵ)∥L2(Q)≤Cd∥g∥L2(Y). In particular, for g∈L2(Y), g(⋅/ϵ)⇀∫Yg weakly in L2(Q).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A periodic L1 or L2 function on the unit cell, a compactly supported C1 slow factor, cell tiling by ϵ(k+Y), affine change of variables for Lebesgue-measurable functions, Cauchy--Schwarz, and smooth density in L2(Q).

[F1]

Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases: integral Cauchy--Schwarz holds on Q and on each cell.

[F2]
[F3]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: affine pullbacks preserve the measurability and almost-everywhere class of periodic functions and transform nonnegative integrals by the determinant.

[F4]

If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz: the bounded gradient of the C1 slow factor gives ∣φ(x)−φ(xk)∣≤∥∇φ∥∞∣x−xk∣ along each line segment in a grid cell.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the periodic representatives and L2 classes use the stated Countable Choice convention.

Proof

1.1F3F4givenalgebra

Tile Rd by cells Ckϵ=ϵ(k+Y). Only Od(ϵ−d) cells meet the fixed compact support of φ. On each such cell choose its lower corner xk=ϵk. The mean-value bound gives ∣φ(x)−φ(xk)∣≤dϵ∥∇φ∥∞. By [F3], ∫Ckϵ∣g(x/ϵ)∣dx=ϵd∥g∥L1(Y). Therefore replacing φ by φ(xk) on every intersecting cell changes the integral by at most Cϵ∥g∥1∥∇φ∥∞; for sufficiently small ϵ, every such cell is contained in Q because the support is compact in Q. Extend φ by zero to a compactly supported C1 function on Rd. For all sufficiently small ϵ, the grid sum has only cells in a fixed bounded box, and ∣ϵd∑kφ(ϵk)−∫Rdφ(x) dx∣≤∑k∫Ckϵ∣φ(ϵk)−φ(x)∣ dx≤Cϵ∥∇φ∥∞, since the total volume of those cells is uniformly bounded. Thus the grid Riemann sums converge. By [F3], the change-of-variables identity first holds for g+ and g− separately; subtracting their finite integrals gives ∫Ckϵg(x/ϵ) dx=ϵd∫Yg for signed g. The cell-corner sum is therefore ϵd∑kφ(ϵk)∫Yg, which converges to the stated mean times integral.

1.2F1F3algebra

The same tiling bounds the L2 rescaling: each cell has ∫Ckϵ∣g(x/ϵ)∣2dx=ϵd∥g∥22 by [F3], and at most Cdϵ−d cells meet Q when ϵ≤1. Summing gives the asserted uniform bound.

2.1step 1.2F2F1step 1.1A1algebra∎

The averaging result applied to every Cc∞(Q) test gives convergence of pairings against that dense class. The uniform L2 bound in step 1.2, together with ∣∫Yg∣≤∥g∥2, lets one approximate an arbitrary L2(Q) test by [F2] and pass the pairing limit. This proves weak L2 convergence.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests

Definition

Let Q=Y=(0,1)d, let ϵn>0 tend to zero, and let (un) be bounded in L2(Q). We say un two-scale converges weakly to u∈L2(Q×Y) along (ϵn) if for every finite sum Φ(x,y)=∑r=1mϕr(x)ψr(y),ϕr∈Cc∞(Q),ψr∈C#∞(Y), one has lim⁡n→∞∫Qun(x)Φ(x,x/ϵn) dx=∫Q∫Yu(x,y)Φ(x,y) dy dx. Here C#∞(Y) is the smooth Zd-periodic class from Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space. The test definition is independent of how a finite sum is represented because both sides are linear in Φ.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors

Statement

Assume a,λ,Λ,Y,V# are as in Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space. For each p∈Rd, the equation in Periodic scalar cell problem has a unique solution χp∈V#. The map p↦χp is linear, and ∥∇χp∥L2(Y)≤(Λ/λ)∣p∣,∥χp∥L2(Y)≤d(Λ/λ)∣p∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a is measurable with λ≤a≤Λ, the periodic cell equation, the cell Poincare inequality, Hilbert completeness and real Lax--Milgram under Countable Choice.

[F1]

Periodic scalar cell problem: the unknown lies in V# and satisfies ∫Ya(p+∇χp)⋅∇v=0 for all v∈V#.

[F2]

Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: V# is Hilbert in the gradient norm, and ∥v∥2≤d∥∇v∥2.

[F3]

The Sobolev space H1 is a Hilbert space: the periodic H1 closure, and its closed mean-zero subspace, are Hilbert under the H1 norm.

[F4]

The Lax--Milgram theorem: a bounded coercive real bilinear form on a Hilbert space has a unique variational solution and the usual norm estimate.

[F5]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data: λ≤a≤Λ almost everywhere.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is the axiom used by the cited Hilbert and Lax--Milgram suppliers; no stronger choice axiom is invoked.

Proof

1.1F5F2F4F1F3A1algebra

On V# with gradient inner product, define b(u,v)=∫Ya∇u⋅∇v and Fp(v)=−∫Yap⋅∇v. By [F5] and Cauchy--Schwarz, ∣b(u,v)∣≤Λ∥∇u∥2∥∇v∥2, b(v,v)≥λ∥∇v∥22, and ∣Fp(v)∣≤Λ∣p∣∥∇v∥2. Thus [F2]–[F4] apply and give a unique χp with b(χp,v)=Fp(v) for every v. Rearranging is exactly [F1].

2.1F2F5step 1.1algebra

Test the equation with v=χp. Then λ∥∇χp∥22≤∫Ya∣∇χp∣2=−∫Yap⋅∇χp≤Λ∣p∣∥∇χp∥2. If the gradient norm is zero the estimate is immediate; otherwise divide by it. The L2 bound follows from [F2].

3.1step 1.1F1algebra∎

For p,q∈Rd and scalars s,t, the function sχp+tχq satisfies the cell equation with datum sp+tq, by linearity of the integral in both p and the corrector. Uniqueness in step 1.1 therefore gives χsp+tq=sχp+tχq.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Two-scale compactness for bounded L2 sequences

Statement

Let Q=Y=(0,1)d, let ϵn↓0 (monotonicity may be dropped; only ϵn→0 is used), and suppose (un) is bounded in L2(Q). Then some subsequence two-scale converges in the sense of Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests to a function u∈L2(Q×Y).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded real L2(Q) sequence, positive scales tending to zero, periodic rescaling, density of smooth product tests, Countable Choice, real Bolzano--Weierstrass, and Hilbert Riesz representation.

[F1]

Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests: convergence is tested against finite sums of compactly supported smooth slow factors and smooth periodic fast factors.

[F2]

Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube: for every fixed smooth product test Φ, ∥Φ(⋅,⋅/ϵn)∥L2(Q)→∥Φ∥L2(Q×Y); this follows by applying periodic averaging to ∣Φ(x,y)∣2.

[F4]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): a point can be selected from each member of a fixed countable family of nonempty sets; this will select the dense test family.

[F5]

Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence: bounded real scalar sequences have convergent subsequences.

[F6]

L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space and Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces: every bounded real linear functional on L2(Q×Y) is integration against a unique L2 function.

[F7]

Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of Lp(Rn) for 1≤p<∞: the finite-measure product space is separable, consistently with the dense test family in [F3].

Proof

1.1F7F3F4F2F5algebra

Let M=sup⁡n∥un∥2. By [F7], extend functions by zero to see that L2(Q×Y) is separable; [F3] says the allowed test subspace is dense there. Intersect a countable base of its metric topology with that subspace and, using [F4], choose one point from every nonempty intersection. The rational span of these points is a countable dense family D. For each fixed Φ∈D, Cauchy--Schwarz gives ∣∫Qun(x)Φ(x,x/ϵn)dx∣≤M∥Φ(⋅,⋅/ϵn)∥2, which is bounded by [F2]. For a bounded real sequence (bn) fix this extraction rule: let m be the least positive integer bounding every ∣bn∣, start with [−m,m], bisect repeatedly, and retain the left closed half when it contains infinitely many terms, otherwise the right closed half. From the rth retained interval take the term with least index larger than the previously selected index. Such indices exist; nestedness and vanishing interval lengths make the selected sequence Cauchy, and [F5] makes it convergent. This uniquely specified extraction map requires no choice. Enumerate D, recursively apply this map to each scalar pairing on the current subsequence, and take as nr the rth index of the rth nested subsequence. The indices increase strictly and their tail lies in every fixed earlier subsequence, so all pairings with D converge. Recursion of the specified map does not use Dependent Choice.

2.1step 1.1F2F3algebra

Denote the limit on D by L0. For each Φ∈D, step 1.1 and [F2] give ∣L0(Φ)∣≤M∥Φ∥L2(Q×Y). Limits preserve rational linearity; the bound makes L0 uniformly continuous, so it has a unique continuous extension L to all of the real Hilbert space L2(Q×Y), with ∥L∥≤M. To verify real homogeneity, first fix Φ∈D and t∈R, and choose rationals qm→t. Since qmΦ∈D, L(qmΦ)=qmL0(Φ); continuity and qmΦ→tΦ give L(tΦ)=tL(Φ). For arbitrary h∈L2(Q×Y), choose Φj∈D with Φj→h; then tΦj→th, and continuity gives L(th)=tL(h). Additivity also passes from D by continuity, so L is bounded and real-linear.

3.1F6F2F1F3step 2.1algebra∎

By [F6], choose u∈L2(Q×Y) such that L(Φ)=∫Q×YuΦ. Fix any allowed smooth product test Ψ and choose Φj∈D with Φj→Ψ in product L2. Along the extracted subsequence, [F2] applied to Ψ−Φj gives lim sup⁡n∣∫Qun(Ψ−Φj)(x,x/ϵn)dx∣≤M∥Ψ−Φj∥2. Also ∣L(Ψ−Φj)∣≤M∥Ψ−Φj∥2. Since the pairings for Φj converge to L(Φj), letting j→∞ proves convergence for Ψ to L(Ψ)=∫uΨ. This is precisely the two-scale convergence in [F1].

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Periodic correctors and effective tensor

Definition

The library represents Rd as functions on d={0,…,d−1}, with standard basis e~j for j<d (The standard list e:n→Fn with ei(i)=1F and ei(j)=0F for j≠i is an ordered basis of Fn; hence dim⁡FFn=n, and F0 is the zero space with basis ∅ and dimension 0). For the usual PDE coordinate labels i=1,…,d, write xi:=x(i−1), set ei:=e~i−1, write pi:=p(i−1), and set ∂i:=∂i−1 in the multi-index convention of Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space. The same shift applies to vector and tensor components, so component label i means library index i−1. By Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors, let χi:=χei be the unique mean-zero solution of the periodic cell equation. Define χp=∑i=1dpiχi and define the constant matrix A∗ by its columns: A∗ei:=∫Ya(y)(ei+∇χi(y)) dy(1≤i≤d). Equivalently, A∗p=∫Ya(y)(p+∇χp(y))dy. All integrals are finite because a∈L∞(Y) and ∇χi∈L2(Y). This definition does not itself assert symmetry or ellipticity.

Remarks

Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor proves symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the tensor.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Two-scale structure of bounded H1-zero gradients

Statement

Let Q=Y=(0,1)d, ϵn>0 with ϵn→0, and (un) be bounded in H01(Q). There are a subsequence, u∈H01(Q), and u1∈L2(Q;V#) such that un⇀u in H01(Q), un→u in L2(Q), and ∇un⇀2∇xu(x)+∇yu1(x,y). Here vector-valued two-scale convergence means componentwise convergence as in Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests, and L2(Q;V#) denotes product-measurable functions whose y-slices lie in V# almost everywhere and whose squared H1(Y) slice norms are integrable over Q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded sequence in H01(Q), positive scales ϵn→0, compact L2 inclusion and separability on the cube, two-scale compactness, the periodic Poincare inequality, and Fourier completeness on the torus.

[F1]

Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: H01(Q) is separable and Hilbert and its bounded sequences have L2-convergent subsequences.

[F2]

A bounded sequence in a separable Hilbert space has a weakly convergent subsequence: bounded sequences in a separable Hilbert space have weakly convergent subsequences under Countable Choice.

[F3]

Two-scale compactness for bounded L2 sequences and Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests: bounded scalar L2 sequences have two-scale convergent subsequences along positive scales ϵn→0.

[F4]

Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube: periodic L2 rescalings are uniformly bounded and converge weakly to their cell means.

[F5]

Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space and Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: V# is the mean-zero periodic H1 closure and its gradient has zero cell mean.

[F6]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: periodic Fourier characters form a complete orthonormal basis and Parseval holds.

[F7]

Weak derivative of a locally integrable function: weak derivatives satisfy integration by parts against compactly supported smooth tests.

[F8]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: iterated integrals may be interchanged for the integrable products used below.

[F9]

Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L2: Cc∞(Q) is dense in L2(Q), so an L2 function pairing to zero with every such test is zero almost everywhere.

[F10]

The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps: for smooth Φ(x,y) and the sampling map x↦(x,x/ϵn), the chain rule differentiates Φ(x,x/ϵn) in x by ∇xΦ+ϵn−1∇yΦ.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is the only choice axiom used in subsequence and countable-density selections.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3A1algebra

By [F1]–[F2], first extract a subsequence converging weakly in H01(Q) to some u∈H01(Q), and then a further subsequence converging strongly in L2(Q) to the same u. By [F3], extract successive further subsequences on which each of the d components of ∇un two-scale converges; since there are finitely many components, one subsequence works for all. Write its vector limit as G(x,y).

2.1F4F3step 1.1algebra

For every allowed product test ϕ(x)ψ(y), strong L2 convergence and the uniform sampled-test bound in [F4] show that replacing un by u in its pairing changes the limit by zero. Weak L2 averaging in [F4], applied to ψ(x/ϵn) against uϕ∈L2(Q), then gives limit ∫Quϕ∫Yψ. Thus the two-scale limit of un is the y-independent function u(x).

2.2F2F3F8F9step 1.1algebra

Set H(x,y):=G(x,y)−∇xu(x). For a smooth compactly supported ϕ(x) and constant vector c, test gradient convergence componentwise with ϕc. Ordinary weak H1 convergence gives ∫Q×YG⋅ϕc=∫Q∇u⋅ϕc. By Cauchy--Schwarz and Tonelli [F8], x↦∫YH(x,y) dy lies in L2(Q) and pairs to zero with every ϕ∈Cc∞(Q); [F9] makes it zero almost everywhere.

3.1F7F8F10step 2.1F3step 2.2algebra

Let Φ(x,y)=∑rϕr(x)Ψr(y) be a smooth periodic vector field, compactly supported in x, with div⁡yΦ=0, and put Φn(x)=Φ(x,x/ϵn). By [F10], div⁡Φn=(div⁡xΦ)(x,x/ϵn)+ϵn−1(div⁡yΦ)(x,x/ϵn)=(div⁡xΦ)(x,x/ϵn). The field Φn is a valid compactly supported smooth test in the weak-derivative identity [F7], so ∫Q∇un⋅Φn=−∫Qundiv⁡Φn. Taking limits by componentwise two-scale convergence for the two allowed tests Φ and div⁡xΦ gives ∫Q×YG⋅Φ=−∫Q×Yu div⁡xΦ=∫Q×Y∇xu⋅Φ, where the last equality is weak integration by parts. Thus H is orthogonal to every such divergence-free field.

4.1step 3.1F9A1step 2.2F6algebra

For every nonzero k∈Zd and every real c⊥k, use slow tests ϕ(x)ccos⁡(2πk⋅y) and ϕ(x)csin⁡(2πk⋅y) in step 3.1. They are divergence-free in y. The resulting pairings show that each real and imaginary component of H^(x,k)⋅c pairs to zero with every ϕ∈Cc∞(Q), so [F9] makes it zero almost everywhere. There are countably many k and a finite basis of each k⊥, so [A1] permits one null set outside which H^(x,k) is parallel to k for all k; the zero coefficient is zero by step 2.2.

5.1step 4.1F6F8F5A1algebra∎

For k≠0 define u^1(x,k)=(H^(x,k)⋅k)/(2πi∣k∣2) and set u^1(x,0)=0. The parallel property from step 4.1 gives 2πiku^1(x,k)=H^(x,k). Moreover ∣u^1(x,k)∣≤∣H^(x,k)∣/(2π∣k∣), so Parseval [F6] and Tonelli [F8] give ∫Q∑k(1+∣k∣2)∣u^1(x,k)∣2dx≤Cd∥H∥L2(Q×Y)2. For almost every x, the sum is finite; the partial Fourier sums over ∣k∣≤N are then Cauchy in H1(Y) by Parseval, and their limit belongs to H#1(Y) because each partial sum is smooth periodic. The zero coefficient makes this limit mean-zero. Define u1 as the product-space L2(Q×Y) limit of these partial sums. Their y-gradients converge there, and the coefficient identity identifies the gradient limit with H. Conjugate symmetry makes the limit real, and the integrated estimate gives the stated square-integrable H1(Y) slice norm. Hence u1∈L2(Q;V#) with ∇yu1=H, completing the decomposition.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor

Statement

Under the scalar periodic ellipticity hypotheses of Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data, the matrix A∗ of Periodic correctors and effective tensor is symmetric and satisfies λ∣p∣2≤p⋅A∗p≤Λ∣p∣2(p∈Rd).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The measurable periodic scalar coefficient satisfies λ≤a≤Λ, the mean-zero cell corrector exists uniquely, and periodic gradients have zero cell mean.

[F1]

Periodic correctors and effective tensor: A∗p=∫Ya(p+∇χp) and χp is the mean-zero corrector.

[F2]

Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: the corrector is linear in p and satisfies the cell variational equation.

[F3]

Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: ∫Y∇v=0 for periodic H1 functions; in particular ∫Y∇χp=0.

[F4]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data: λ≤a≤Λ almost everywhere and ∣Y∣=1.

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

Test the corrector equation for χp with χq. It gives ∫Ya(p+∇χp)⋅∇χq=0. Interchanging p,q gives ∫Ya(q+∇χq)⋅∇χp=0. Thus p⋅A∗q=∫Ya(p+∇χp)⋅(q+∇χq)=q⋅A∗p, where the first equality follows from [F1] after adding the zero term with ∇χp, and the last integral is symmetric in p,q. Hence A∗ is symmetric.

2.1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Taking q=p in the same identity yields p⋅A∗p=∫Ya∣p+∇χp∣2. Since the mean of p+∇χp is p by [F3], Cauchy--Schwarz on the unit-measure cell gives ∫Y∣p+∇χp∣2≥∣p∣2. The lower coefficient bound in [F4] proves p⋅A∗p≥λ∣p∣2.

3.1F1F2F4step 2.1algebra∎

The cell equation makes χp the minimizer of Jp(v)=∫Ya∣p+∇v∣2 over v∈V#. Indeed, for v=χp+w, expansion gives Jp(v)=Jp(χp)+2∫Ya(p+∇χp)⋅∇w+∫Ya∣∇w∣2, whose middle term is zero and last term is nonnegative. Taking the competitor v=0 gives p⋅A∗p=Jp(χp)≤Jp(0)=∫Ya∣p∣2≤Λ∣p∣2.

AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes

Definition

This procedure defines a real-arithmetic finite-dimensional FE-HMM discretization. Its output is UH unless an ExactSolve call returns singular-system, in which case that token is returned; Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗ proves the exceptional branch is unreachable for the stated inputs. It makes no bit-complexity claim, no coefficient-oracle claim, and no claim about numerically computing its exact integral entries; those entries are the mathematical values of the displayed integrals. Fix Q=(0,1)2 and coefficient a from Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data. Use the diagonal of the square from (0,0) to (1,1) as a two-triangle initial matching macro mesh. Label that shared diagonal 0 in both triangles and each exterior edge 1. It is a compatible labeled mesh in the sense of Compatible 2D newest-vertex-bisection meshes. The macro input is any finite admissible descendant triangulation T of this mesh. Its cells are closed affine triangles as in Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity.

Choose ϵ>0, a micro side length δ>0, f∈L2(Q), and a finite matching triangulation M of the unit square whose opposite boundary edges and vertices match under translation by the PDE coordinate vectors e1,e2 of Periodic correctors and effective tensor. The periodic micro space is WM:={z∈V#:z is continuous and affine on every triangle of M}. Here z means an H#1(Y) class with a continuous periodic piecewise-affine representative; the periodic closure condition identifies opposite traces. Thus WM is the finite-dimensional mean-zero subspace of the periodic P1 space, as proved in Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗. Let VH be the conforming zero-boundary continuous piecewise-affine macro space on T, using Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh. Its inclusion in H01(Q) is supplied by Continuous matching piecewise polynomials belong to W1p and Zero-boundary conforming polynomials lie in W0 1p and satisfy Poincare.

Identify vertices of M that match under the opposite-edge translations, and order the resulting periodic vertex classes by the lexicographically least representative of each class. Let ϕ1,…,ϕN be the continuous periodic P1 nodal functions for these classes, with ϕi=1 at class i and 0 at the other classes. Set mi=∫Yϕi dy. If N=1, use the empty basis of WM; otherwise use ψi:=ϕi−mim1ϕ1(2≤i≤N) as the ordered basis of WM. The nodal basis spans the full periodic P1 space, and these functions form a basis of its mean-zero subspace.

Use the following exact solver on the systems assembled below. Given a real matrix A∈Rn×n and b∈Rn, ExactSolve(A,b) returns the empty vector if n=0. Otherwise use temporary solver labels 1,…,n, with solver coordinate i corresponding to library coordinate i−1 of Rn (The vector space FX of all functions X→F with pointwise operations, and Fn as the case X=n={0,1,…,n−1}), and form the augmented matrix [A∣b]. For k=1,…,n, choose the least row index p≥k whose current entry in column k is nonzero; if there is no such row, return singular-system. Swap the entire augmented rows p and k. For each i=k+1,…,n, set r=Aik/Akk, replace the entire augmented row i by row i−r rowk, and set its column-k entry to zero. After this loop, compute in order k=n,n−1,…,1 by xk=bk−∑j=k+1nAkjxjAkk, using entries of the resulting upper-triangular augmented matrix. Return the vector x∈Rn whose library coordinate x(k−1) equals xk. All arithmetic and zero tests are exact over R; the systems assembled below are positive definite.

Order macro triangles by lexicographic order of their barycenters. For each such K, use its barycenter xK as the single quadrature point with positive weight ∣K∣, and set bK(y):=a ⁣(xKϵ+δϵy)(y∈Y). The affine change-of-variables theorem A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions makes this a measurable coefficient class independent of the representative of a, with λ≤bK≤Λ almost everywhere. For each PDE coordinate vector ej of Periodic correctors and effective tensor, in order j=1,2, assemble GiℓK:=∫YbK∇ψℓ⋅∇ψi dy,ri,jK:=−∫YbKej⋅∇ψi dy over the micro-basis indices 2≤i,ℓ≤N. If that basis is empty, set wK,jh=0; otherwise call ExactSolve(G^K,r^K_{\cdot,j}), index its returned coordinates by 2,…,N, and set wK,jh=∑ℓ=2Nxℓψℓ. Then set AKhej:=∫YbK(y)(ej+∇ywK,jh(y)) dy. If the micro call returns singular-system, propagate that output; Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗ proves this branch is not reached. Otherwise identify solver index i−1 with micro-basis index i for 2≤i≤N and use the returned coefficient as xi in the displayed sum. The singular-system branch is included to make the solver instruction total.

Order the interior vertices of T lexicographically and let φ1,…,φM be the corresponding nodal basis of VH. If M=0, set UH=0. Otherwise assemble Hrs:=∑K∈T∣K∣ ∇φs∣K⋅AKh∇φr∣K,Fr:=∫Qfφr dx, call ExactSolve(H,F). If it returns singular-system, propagate that output; the well-posedness lemma proves this branch is not reached. Otherwise set UH:=∑s=1Mxsφs, with solver index s identified with macro-basis index s. This basis system is exactly the variational system BH(U,V)=∑K∈T∣K∣ ∇U∣K⋅AKh∇V∣K=∫QfV(V∈VH). The macro matrix is positive definite and its singular-system branch is unreachable by Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗. Output UH. The centroid quadrature is positive and exact for constants, which is the only quadrature property used in the error theorem.

Interface

The local continuum comparator uses the same coefficient bK on the unit micro cell with the full periodic space V#; it is defined and proved well posed in Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves ↗. The period ratio is r=δ/ϵ. No accuracy is asserted for arbitrary r; micro approximation and sampling/resonance are separated in FE-HMM macro, micro, and sampling error separation.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

No sampling resonance for period-aligned periodic micro cells

Statement

For any dimension d, phase θ∈Rd, and positive integer m, let b(y)=a(θ+my) on Y. Let wp∈V# be the unique mean-zero minimizer of ∫Yb(y)∣p+∇v(y)∣2dy and define Aθ,mexp=∫Yb(y)(p+∇wp(y))dy. Then Aθ,mex=A∗ for every p∈Rd. Thus a micro side length δ=mϵ has zero continuum sampling/resonance error, regardless of phase; a separate finite micro-space error can remain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a is scalar, measurable, Zd-periodic, uniformly elliptic; χp is its mean-zero exact corrector; the local periodic-coupling cell space is V#.

[F1]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: if m is a positive integer, then b(y)=a(θ+my) is a measurable, unit-periodic coefficient with the same ellipticity bounds; pullback preserves the a.e. periodicity and bounds.

[F2]

Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: χp solves the cell equation and A∗p is the mean corrector flux.

[F3]

Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: subtracting the mean fixes the potential without changing its gradient, and mean-zero periodic gradients integrate to zero.

[F4]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: Fourier expansions and Parseval are valid for periodic L2 fluxes.

[F5]

Affine pullback of weak derivatives and Sobolev seminorms: affine pullback preserves H1 membership and applies the weak chain rule to the periodic corrector.

[F6]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: the phase-shifted affine pullback preserves measurable classes and transforms nonnegative integrals by its determinant; signed integrals follow by positive and negative parts.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6algebra

Since mk∈Zd for each k∈Zd, periodicity of a gives b(y+k)=b(y) a.e.; the exceptional null sets pull back to null sets by [F6]. Bounds are preserved by the same affine pullback [F1]. Hence the generic cell-corrector result [F2] applies to b and gives its unique mean-zero cell solution; energy expansion around that solution shows it is the unique minimizer in the Statement. Set vm(y)=m−1χp(θ+my)−c, where c is its mean on Y. Periodic smooth approximants to χp converge on every bounded union of cells, and affine pullback [F5] shows vm∈V# with ∇yvm=∇χp(θ+my). The flux q(z)=a(z)(p+∇χp(z)) is periodic and divergence-free by the cell equation. Test the cell equation with the mean-zero real and imaginary parts of e−2πik⋅z for k≠0. Their gradients are the corresponding parts of −2πike−2πik⋅z, so combining the two zero identities gives k⋅q^(k)=0 (and the identity is automatic at k=0). For a Fourier polynomial, q(θ+my) has only frequencies mk, with coefficients multiplied by phases, and each remains perpendicular to mk; hence it is divergence-free. For any periodic h∈L2(Y), affine change of variables [F6] gives ∫Y∣h(θ+my)∣2dy=m−d∫θ+mY∣h(z)∣2dz. The latter box meets at most (m+2)d unit lattice cells, so periodicity bounds this by m−d(m+2)d∥h∥L2(Y)2. Thus composition with y↦θ+my is bounded on periodic L2, and the divergence-free identity passes from Fourier polynomials to q in L2. Therefore ∫Yb(y)(p+∇vm)⋅∇z=0 for every smooth periodic z, and by density for every z∈V#. Uniqueness of the cell solution for b identifies it with vm.

2.1F6F2step 1.1algebra∎

The sampled tensor flux is ∫Yq(θ+my)dy. By [F6], applied to the positive and negative parts of each component, this equals m−d∫θ+mYq(z)dz. The box θ+mY is a union, up to null boundaries, of md cells θ+k+Y with integer k, so periodicity makes each cell integral equal to ∫θ+Yq. A translated unit cell has the same integral as Y: partition it at the integer coordinate faces and translate each resulting piece by an integer lattice vector into Y; applying [F6] to positive and negative parts and using periodicity gives equality componentwise. Thus the average is ∫Yq=A∗p. This holds for all p, so the sampled tensor is exactly A∗.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

One-dimensional nonaligned micro sampling resonance bound

Statement

In one dimension, let a be measurable, 1-periodic, and satisfy 0<λ≤a≤Λ. For a phase θ∈R and ratio r=δ/ϵ≥1, let wr∈V# solve ∫01a(θ+ry)(1+wr′)v′ dy=0 for every v∈V#, and define Ar(θ)=∫01a(θ+ry)(1+wr′) dy. Then Ar(θ)=(∫01dya(θ+ry))−1,A∗=(∫01dya(y))−1, and ∣Ar(θ)−A∗∣≤2Λ2λr=2Λ2λϵδ. No dimension-independent bound for the unaligned case is claimed here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A measurable one-dimensional periodic scalar coefficient with λ≤a≤Λ, and periodic mean-zero corrector problems for both the original and sampled coefficient.

[F1]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: a is periodic, λ≤a≤Λ almost everywhere, and the affine sampled coefficient a(θ+ry) is a well-defined measurable class with the same bounds.

[F2]

Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: A∗ is the mean flux of the exact mean-zero cell corrector.

[F3]

Periodic scalar cell problem: the mean-zero periodic coupling tests against every periodic fluctuation; a constant flux therefore solves the cell equation.

[F4]

Periodic L2 weak derivative on the circle, Fourier coefficients of a periodic weak derivative, and The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: a periodic L2 weak derivative has Fourier coefficients 2πikf^(k), and Parseval holds.

[F5]

Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: the bounded triangular integrand in the primitive calculation can be integrated in either order.

[F6]

Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: every periodic H1 derivative has zero cell integral.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6algebra

For either b=a or b(y)=a(θ+ry), define cb=(∫01b−1)−1 and hb=cb/b−1. The ellipticity bounds make hb∈L∞(0,1), and ∫01hb=0. Put χb(t)=∫0thb(s)ds. For every smooth periodic φ, Fubini [F5] gives ∫01χb(t)φ′(t)dt=∫01hb(s)(φ(1)−φ(s))ds=−∫01hb(s)φ(s)ds, so hb is its periodic weak derivative. By [F4], the symmetric Fourier partial sums of χb are real trigonometric polynomials and converge in H1(0,1), since both χb and hb are in L2 and their Fourier coefficients satisfy the weak-derivative relation; after subtracting its mean, the limit belongs to V# by the closure definition. Since b(1+hb)=cb almost everywhere, for every v∈V# we have ∫01b(1+χb′)v′=cb∫01v′=0 by [F6]. Thus it solves the cell equation. If two mean-zero solutions existed, testing their difference equation by the difference would give ∫b∣χ′−χ~′∣2=0; the periodic Poincare inequality [F6] then makes their difference zero. This proves both harmonic-mean formulas, including the nonperiodic-in-y sampled coefficient under periodic coupling.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Put g=1/a and I=∫01g. Write r=N+s with integer N≥1 and 0≤s<1. Periodicity gives ∫0rg(θ+t)dt=NI+R,R=∫θθ+sg(t)dt, so ∫01g(θ+ry)dy=I+(R−sI)/r. Since 0<g≤1/λ, both R and sI lie in [0,s/λ], hence ∣R−sI∣≤s/λ≤1/λ. In particular the weaker bound ∣Ir−I∣≤2/(λr) holds. Also I,Ir≥1/Λ. Therefore ∣Ar−A∗∣=∣Ir−I∣IrI≤2λrΛ2, as claimed.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Periodic scalar Dirichlet homogenization on the unit cube

Statement

Let Q=(0,1)d, let a be a measurable Zd-periodic scalar coefficient with 0<λ≤a≤Λ, and let f∈L2(Q). For ϵ>0 let uϵ∈H01(Q) be the unique weak solution ∫Qa(x/ϵ)∇uϵ⋅∇v=∫Qfv(v∈H01(Q)). Let u0∈H01(Q) be the unique solution with A∗ from Periodic correctors and effective tensor in place of a(x/ϵ)I. Then as ϵ↓0, uϵ⇀u0 in H01(Q).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The measurable periodic scalar ellipticity bounds, the corrector cell equation, two-scale compactness and gradient decomposition, periodic averaging, Lax--Milgram, and Countable Choice.

[F1]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data: a is measurable and periodic, λ≤a≤Λ, and the physical coefficient is a(x/ϵ).

[F2]

Periodic scalar cell problem, Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors, and Periodic correctors and effective tensor: the mean-zero corrector exists uniquely, depends linearly on its vector argument, and defines the flux average A∗p.

[F3]

Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor: A∗ is symmetric and λI≤A∗≤ΛI.

[F4]

Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: H01(Q) is Hilbert, separable, satisfies ∥v∥2≤∥∇v∥2, and bounded sequences are compact in L2.

[F5]

The Lax--Milgram theorem: bounded coercive forms on a Hilbert space have unique weak solutions.

[F6]

Two-scale structure of bounded H1-zero gradients: along any ϵn>0 with ϵn→0, a bounded H01 sequence has a subsequence with two-scale gradient limit ∇u+∇yu1 and un⇀u in H01.

[F7]

Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube and The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: periodic rescalings have uniform L2 bounds and weak cell-mean limits, and Fourier characters are complete in periodic L2.

[F8]

Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure: H01(Q) is the norm closure of Cc∞(Q), so the homogenized variational identity extends from compactly supported smooth tests.

[F9]

Weak topology on a normed space: weak convergence is convergence under every bounded linear functional.

[F10]

Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space and The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: H#1(Y) is the H1 closure of smooth periodic functions, V# is its zero-mean subspace, and Parseval applies to each smooth periodic function and its first derivatives; step 1.2 proves the required rational trigonometric density from these facts.

[F11]
[F12]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: the section integrals used to define Fw are measurable and obey the iterated-integral identities for the integrable products below.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice supplies the subsequences and the countable dense trigonometric test family; neither full Choice nor Dependent Choice is used.

Proof

1.1F4F5F3F1algebra

Equip H01(Q) with gradient norm, equivalent to its Sobolev norm by [F4]. The form bϵ(u,v)=∫Qa(x/ϵ)∇u⋅∇v is bounded by Λ∥∇u∥2∥∇v∥2 and coercive with constant λ; F(v)=∫Qfv is bounded by ∥f∥2∥∇v∥2. Thus [F5] gives a unique uϵ. The same argument using [F3] gives a unique u0. Testing with uϵ gives ∥∇uϵ∥2≤λ−1∥f∥2 (with the zero-gradient case immediate).

1.2F10algebra

For smooth periodic mean-zero w, let w^(k) be its Fourier coefficients and PNw=∑∣k∣≤Nw^(k)e2πik⋅y. Periodic integration by parts gives ∂jw^(k)=2πikjw^(k). Parseval [F10], applied to w and all its first derivatives, yields ∥w−PNw∥H1(Y)2=∑∣k∣>N(1+4π2∣k∣2)∣w^(k)∣2⟶0. The zero coefficient vanishes, and the symmetric truncation preserves reality. For each finite truncation, approximate its finitely many coefficients by rational real and imaginary parts while imposing c−k=ck‾; this gives a countable family of rational-coefficient, real, mean-zero trigonometric polynomials dense in the smooth periodic mean-zero functions in H1(Y). If v∈V#, choose a smooth periodic w arbitrarily close to v in H1 by [F10], then replace w by w−∫Yw; since ∫Yv=0, this subtraction still approximates v. The rational polynomials are therefore dense in all of V#.

2.1F6F4step 1.1A1algebra

Fix any sequence ϵn→0. Apply [F6] to the bounded solutions. Along a subsequence, uϵn⇀u in H01, strongly in L2, and ∇uϵn two-scale converges to ∇u+∇yu1 for u1∈L2(Q;V#). It remains to identify u.

3.1F7F1F6step 2.1algebra

Fix ϕ,η∈Cc∞(Q) and a smooth periodic w(y). The oscillating test vn(x)=ϕ(x)+ϵnη(x)w(x/ϵn) lies in H01(Q) and has gradient ∇ϕ+η∇yw(x/ϵn)+ϵnw(x/ϵn)∇η. The last term contributes a quantity tending to zero by boundedness of ∇uϵn and the uniform rescaling bound [F7]. On the other terms, two-scale convergence gives ∫Q×Ya(y)(∇u+∇yu1)⋅(∇ϕ+η∇yw)=∫Qfϕ, where the test may contain the measurable factor a(y): approximate each a(y) times a smooth periodic factor in L2(Y) by smooth Fourier sums and use the uniform rescaling bound [F7] and boundedness of ∇uϵn. The right side converges because ϵnηw(x/ϵn)→0 in L2.

4.1step 3.1F11F12algebra

Set ϕ=0 in step 3.1 and let η∈Cc∞(Q) be arbitrary. For each smooth periodic w, this gives ∫Qη(x)Fw(x) dx=0, where Fw(x):=∫Ya(y)(∇u(x)+∇yu1(x,y))⋅∇yw(y) dy. For almost every x, Cauchy--Schwarz in y gives ∣Fw(x)∣≤Λ∥∇yw∥L2(Y)(∣∇u(x)∣+∥∇yu1(x,⋅)∥L2(Y)). The right side belongs to L2(Q) because u∈H01(Q) and u1∈L2(Q;V#). The absolute value of the integrand is integrable on Q×Y, so Tonelli applied to its positive and negative parts gives measurability of the section integral [F12]. Thus Fw∈L2(Q). Since its pairing with every η∈Cc∞(Q) vanishes, density [F11] implies Fw=0 almost everywhere.

5.1step 4.1step 1.2F10A1F2algebra

Use [A1] to take one common full-measure set for the countable dense family from step 1.2, and intersect it with the full-measure set where u1(x,⋅)∈V# and ∇u(x) is defined. For each such x, the cell functional is continuous in the H1 norm, so the equation extends from that dense family to every w∈V#. Uniqueness in [F2] yields u1(x,⋅)=χ∇u(x) in V#.

6.1step 3.1step 5.1F2F8F5F3algebra

Now use step 3.1 with w=0. Step 5.1 and the flux definition [F2] identify its averaged flux as ∫Ya(∇u+∇yu1)=A∗∇u. Therefore ∫QA∗∇u⋅∇ϕ=∫Qfϕ for every ϕ∈Cc∞(Q). Density [F8] and boundedness of the form extend this to all test functions in H01(Q), so uniqueness in [F5] gives u=u0.

7.1step 2.1step 6.1F9F4algebra∎

Every sequence ϵn→0 has a subsequence weakly converging to u0 by steps 2.1–6.1. If the family failed to converge weakly to u0, [F9] would give a bounded linear functional and a sequence ϵn→0 whose scalar values stay a fixed positive distance from its value at u0; the subsequence just obtained contradicts that. Thus the full weak convergence holds.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Antisymmetric periodic flux potential

Statement

For each column j, define the mean-zero periodic flux qj(y)=a(y)(ej+∇χj(y))−A∗ej. There is a mean-zero periodic tensor σj∈H#1(Y;Rd×d) such that σikj=−σkij and qij=∑k=1d∂ykσikjin distributions on the torus,∥σj∥H1(Y)≤Cd∥qj∥L2(Y).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic cell corrector and effective tensor, the cell equation, mean-zero gradient property, divergence-free corrector flux, and Fourier basis/Parseval on the torus.

[F1]

Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: qj=a(ej+∇χj)−A∗ej is in L2(Y) and has zero mean.

[F2]

Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: ∫Ya(ej+∇χj)⋅∇v=0 for every periodic mean-zero v; by subtracting constants it holds for every smooth periodic v.

[F3]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: Fourier characters are complete and Parseval identifies L2 norms with coefficient sums.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is assumed by the Fourier supplier [F3]; no stronger choice axiom is used here. Fourier coefficients are integrals of L2 classes against bounded characters and are invariant under changes on null sets.

Proof

1.1F2F1F3A1algebra

For each smooth periodic scalar v, [F2] gives ∫Ya(ej+∇χj)⋅∇v=0, so div⁡yqj=0 distributionally. Its mean is zero by the definition of A∗ in [F1]. Testing with the real and imaginary parts of e−2πim⋅y therefore gives, for every nonzero Fourier mode m∈Zd, m⋅q^j(m)=0, and q^j(0)=0.

2.1step 1.1F3A1algebra∎

For m≠0 define σ^ikj(m)=mkq^ij(m)−miq^kj(m)2πi∣m∣2,σ^ikj(0)=0. Then σ^ikj=−σ^kij and ∑k2πimkσ^ikj(m)=q^ij(m)−mi∣m∣2∑kmkq^kj(m)=q^ij(m) by step 1.1. Also ∣σ^j(m)∣≤Cd∣m∣−1∣q^j(m)∣, so ∑m(1+∣m∣2)∣σ^j(m)∣2≤Cd∑m∣q^j(m)∣2. By [F3], the symmetric Fourier partial sums and each of their first derivatives are Cauchy in L2, since differentiation multiplies the coefficients by 2πimk. Their L2 limits satisfy the weak-derivative identity by passing to the limit in integration by parts against smooth tests. Thus the partial sums converge in H1 to a tensor in the periodic H1 closure, with zero mean and the asserted norm bound. The coefficient identity and completeness [F3] give its divergence qj; conjugate symmetry makes it real.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves

Statement

For every macro cell K in Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes, the coefficient bK satisfies λ≤bK≤Λ. For each p∈R2, both the full cell problem on V# and its restriction to WM have unique solutions wK,p and wK,ph. The tensors AKexp=∫YbK(p+∇wK,p),AKhp=∫YbK(p+∇wK,ph) are symmetric and satisfy λI≤AKex,AKh≤ΛI. Consequently the macro FE-HMM system in the algorithm has a unique solution. The exact Gaussian-elimination calls specified there terminate without the singular-system branch and return the unique solutions of the assembled micro and macro variational systems.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The coefficient bound, full periodic cell space, finite-dimensional periodic P1 subspace, periodic gradients of mean zero, zero-boundary macro space, and real Lax--Milgram.

[F1]

Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes: WM consists of mean-zero periodic H#1(Y) classes with continuous piecewise-affine representatives, and bK(y)=a(xK/ϵ+ry).

[F2]

Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space and Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: V# is a Hilbert space in the gradient norm and ∫Y∇v=0 for every v∈V#.

[F3]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: affine pullback preserves coefficient measurability, null sets, and the bounds λ≤a≤Λ, hence λ≤bK≤Λ almost everywhere.

[F4]

The Lax--Milgram theorem: bounded coercive bilinear forms on Hilbert spaces have unique solutions.

[F6]

Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: ∥v∥2≤∥∇v∥2 on H01(Q).

[F7]

Forward and backward substitution are correct, unique, and quadratic in scalar operations: backward substitution on a real upper-triangular matrix with nonzero diagonal returns its unique solution in finitely many steps.

[F8]

Gauss–Green formula on an affine simplex and Interior facet orientations cancel in a matching mesh: cellwise integration by parts holds and matching interior-facet terms cancel.

[F9]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: trigonometric polynomials are complete in L2(Y) and Parseval holds componentwise.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the periodic Sobolev and Hilbert conventions use Countable Choice; no stronger axiom is required here.

Proof

1.1F3F2F4F5F8F9F1A1algebra

Every continuous periodic P1 nodal hat ϕi on M is in H1(Y) by the conforming piecewise-polynomial theorem in [F5]. For each coordinate 0≤j<2 and Fourier mode k∈Z2, apply [F8] on each triangle to ϕi(y)e−2πik⋅y. Interior-edge terms cancel by matching traces; opposite boundary-edge terms cancel because ϕi is periodic and k is integral. Thus ∂jϕi^(k)=2πikjϕ^i(k). Parseval [F9] applied to ϕi and its two weak derivatives shows that symmetric Fourier partial sums converge in H1(Y); they are real smooth periodic trigonometric polynomials, so ϕi∈H#1(Y). The periodic nodal hats form a basis of the full periodic P1 space because a continuous P1 function is determined by its nodal values, with opposite-edge vertices identified. Each hat is nonnegative and positive on an incident triangle, so mi=∫Yϕi>0. A nodal combination ∑iciϕi has zero mean exactly when ∑imici=0; solving this constraint for c1 shows that the ψi defined in the algorithm form a basis of WM (and when N=1 that space is zero). For fixed K,p, on V# define cK(u,v)=∫YbK∇u⋅∇v and FK,p(v)=−∫YbKp⋅∇v. The bounds [F3] give ∣cK(u,v)∣≤Λ∥∇u∥2∥∇v∥2, cK(v,v)≥λ∥∇v∥22, and ∣FK,p(v)∣≤Λ∣p∣∥∇v∥2. By [F2], [F4] gives a unique solution wK,p. The finite-dimensional gradient inner product is positive definite on WM because it is a subspace of the mean-zero space V#; hence it is complete and the same boundedness and coercivity estimates give the unique wK,ph by [F4]. Testing its equation with each basis function ψi gives exactly the matrix system GKc=r⋅,pK from the algorithm. Its matrix is symmetric positive definite since, for each nonzero coefficient vector, the corresponding zh≠0 in WM has ∫YbK∣∇zh∣2>0.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Each solution is linear in p by uniqueness. For either space X=V# or X=WM, the variational equation says wK,pX minimizes JK,p(z)=∫YbK∣p+∇z∣2 over X: expanding at the solution cancels the cross term and leaves ∫bK∣∇(z−w)∣2≥0. For p,q, testing the q equation with wK,pX shows p⋅AKXq=∫YbK(p+∇wK,pX)⋅(q+∇wK,qX), so the tensor is symmetric. Since ∫Y∇wK,pX=0 by [F2], Jensen gives JK,p(wK,pX)≥λ∣p∣2; the competitor zero gives it at most Λ∣p∣2.

3.1F5F1step 2.1F6F4algebra

The interior macro nodal functions listed in the algorithm form a basis of VH, since a conforming P1 function is determined by its vertex values and the boundary values are fixed to zero. By [F5] the macro space is a finite-dimensional subspace of H01(Q). For U∈VH, [F1] and step 2.1 imply BH(U,U)=∑K∣K∣∇U∣K⋅AKh∇U∣K≥λ∥∇U∥L2(Q)2. This is positive for every nonzero U; [F6] ensures the gradient seminorm is a norm on VH. The load is bounded by ∥f∥2∥U∥2≤∥f∥2∥∇U∥2. Thus finite-dimensional Lax--Milgram [F4] gives a unique macro solution; if the space is zero, its sole element is the unique solution by definition. Testing with each interior nodal function gives Hrs=BH(φs,φr) and Fr=∫Qfφr, so Hx=F is equivalent to the macro variational equation. In particular H is symmetric positive definite. The micro and macro systems are therefore nonsingular.

4.1F1step 1.1step 3.1F7algebra∎

Consider any matrix A passed to ExactSolve; steps 1.1 and 3.1 show it is real, symmetric, positive definite, and hence nonsingular. After k−1 elimination stages its coefficient matrix is row-equivalent to A and has block form (RC0S), where R is upper triangular with nonzero diagonal. The full matrix and R are nonsingular, so S is nonsingular: otherwise a nonzero z with Sz=0 and the solution y of Ry=−Cz would give a nonzero kernel vector (y,z). Thus the first column of S has a nonzero entry, and the prescribed least-row search finds a pivot. Row swaps and row additions preserve the solution set; after finitely many stages the system is upper triangular with nonzero diagonal. Back substitution is finite and correct by [F7], so ExactSolve terminates without its singular branch and returns the unique solution of the assembled matrix equation. The micro systems in step 1.1 are exactly the restricted cell variational equations on a basis; the macro system in step 3.1 is exactly the macro variational equation on a basis. This proves the solver assertion for both.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Strong L2 convergence in periodic Dirichlet homogenization

Statement

Under the hypotheses and notation of Periodic scalar Dirichlet homogenization on the unit cube, uϵ→u0 strongly in L2(Q).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic weak solutions satisfy the oscillatory equation, every weak cluster limit is u0, and the cube embedding H01(Q)↪L2(Q) is compact.

[F1]

Periodic scalar Dirichlet homogenization on the unit cube: uϵ⇀u0 in H01(Q) and hence weakly in L2(Q).

[F2]

Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: every bounded H01(Q) sequence has a strongly L2-convergent subsequence.

[F3]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: testing the oscillatory equation with uϵ and using λ≤a(x/ϵ) a.e. and ∥uϵ∥2≤∥∇uϵ∥2 gives ∥∇uϵ∥2≤λ−1∥f∥2 (with the zero-gradient case immediate).

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): subsequence selections use Countable Choice.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3A1algebra

Suppose strong convergence failed. Then some δ>0 and sequence ϵn→0 satisfy ∥uϵn−u0∥2≥δ for every n. Testing the oscillatory weak equation with uϵn and using [F3] gives a uniform H01(Q) bound: if ∥∇uϵn∥2>0, divide λ∥∇uϵn∥22≤∥f∥2∥uϵn∥2≤∥f∥2∥∇uϵn∥2 by that norm, and if it is zero the bound is immediate. By [F2] and [A1], a subsequence converges strongly in L2 to some v. Its weak L2 limit is also u0 by [F1], so uniqueness of weak limits in the Hilbert space L2(Q) gives v=u0. This contradicts the lower bound δ.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The contradiction proves ∥uϵ−u0∥2→0 as ϵ↓0.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Boundary-cutoff corrector estimate for regular periodic data

Statement

Let Q=(0,1)d, 0<λ≤a≤Λ be scalar and periodic, and let f∈L2(Q). For each ϵ>0, let uϵ∈H01(Q) solve the oscillatory weak equation with coefficient a(x/ϵ), and suppose u0∈C2(Q‾)∩H01(Q) solves the homogenized equation with the same datum f. For 0<ϵ≤1/4 choose a Lipschitz cutoff ηϵ equal to zero where dist⁡(x,∂Q)≤ϵ, equal to one where that distance is at least 2ϵ, and with ∣∇ηϵ∣≤Cd/ϵ. Define wϵ(x)=u0(x)+ϵηϵ(x)∑j=1dχj(x/ϵ)∂ju0(x). Then wϵ∈H01(Q) and, for a constant independent of ϵ, ∥∇(uϵ−wϵ)∥L2(Q)+∥uϵ−u0∥L2(Q)≤Cϵ. The constant may depend on d,λ,Λ, the fixed corrector and flux-potential H1(Y) norms, ∥u0∥C2(Q‾), and the cutoff profile. No rate is asserted without this regularity and periodicity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic correctors and flux potentials, u0∈C2∩H01 solving the constant-coefficient equation, scalar ellipticity, and a cutoff supported away from the boundary.

[F1]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: a(x/ϵ) is a well-defined measurable class and λ≤a(x/ϵ)≤Λ almost everywhere.

[F2]

Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: χj∈H#1(Y) solves the cell equation and A∗ej=∫Ya(ej+∇χj).

[F3]

Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor: A∗ is symmetric elliptic, and the given u0 satisfies ∫QA∗∇u0⋅∇v=∫Qfv.

[F4]

Antisymmetric periodic flux potential: qij=a(δij+∂iχj)−Aij∗=∂kσikj with σikj=−σkij and σj∈H#1(Y).

[F5]

Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube: periodic L2 rescalings have uniformly bounded L2(Q) norm for 0<ϵ≤1.

[F6]

Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: ∥v∥2≤∥∇v∥2 for v∈H01(Q) and Cc∞(Q) is dense in that space.

[F7]

The Lax--Milgram theorem: the oscillatory coercive weak equation has a unique solution in H01(Q).

[F8]

Affine pullback of weak derivatives and Sobolev seminorms: affine rescaling of a periodic H1 function is locally H1 and obeys the weak chain rule; periodic smooth approximants converge on every bounded union of cells.

[F9]

Compactly supported H1 functions lie in H1_0: an H1(Q) function that vanishes almost everywhere outside a compact subset of Q belongs to H01(Q).

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): periodic Sobolev representatives use the declared Countable Choice convention.

Proof

1.1F7F1F2F3F4F8F9A1algebra

Let θ(s)=0 for s≤1, θ(s)=1 for s≥2, and linear on [1,2], and set ηϵ(x)=θ(dist⁡(x,∂Q)/ϵ). Distance to a closed set is 1-Lipschitz, so this cutoff has the required gradient bound. Set Uϵ=u0+ϵ∑jχj(x/ϵ)gj(x) with gj=∂ju0. For each corrector, its defining smooth periodic approximants converge in H1 on any bounded union of period cells, since that union meets only finitely many cells. Applying the affine pullback rule [F8] with y=x/ϵ shows χj(x/ϵ)∈H1(Q) with weak gradient ϵ−1∇yχj(x/ϵ). Multiplication by gj∈C1(Q‾) preserves H1: apply the classical product rule to the smooth periodic approximants and pass in H1, using the boundedness of gj and ∇gj. The cutoff correction is an H1(Q) function supported in the compact set {x∈Q‾:dist⁡(x,∂Q)≥ϵ}⊂Q; [F9] puts it in H01(Q), so wϵ∈H01(Q). Existence and uniqueness of uϵ follow from [F7]. Differentiating the uncut expression by the weak chain and product rules gives a(x/ϵ)∇Uϵ=A∗∇u0+∑jqj(x/ϵ)gj+ϵa(x/ϵ)∑jχj(x/ϵ)∇gj. Subtract the homogenized weak equation for u0.

2.1F5step 1.1F1F6F8F9F4algebra

Extend each periodic potential σj to the bounded region ϵ−1Q as the H1 limit of its smooth periodic approximants; the finite-cell bound gives convergence there. For v∈Cc∞(Q), [F8] gives qij(x/ϵ)=ϵ∂xkσikj(x/ϵ) in distributions. The product gj∂iv is H1(Q) with compact support, so [F9] places it in H01(Q) and the distributional identity extends to this test by density. Integration by parts and antisymmetry of σikj cancel the term containing ∂kiv, since the Hessian is symmetric; the remaining term is ∫Qqij(x/ϵ)gj∂iv=−ϵ∫Qσikj(x/ϵ)(∂kgj)(∂iv). Approximate the periodic potential by smooth periodic functions and pass in L2. By [F5] and boundedness of D2u0, this has magnitude at most Cϵ∥∇v∥2. The last flux term in step 1.1 has the same bound by [F1], [F5], and boundedness of D2u0. Density in [F6] extends the residual estimate to every v∈H01(Q): ∣∫Qa(x/ϵ)∇Uϵ⋅∇v−∫Qfv∣≤Cϵ∥∇v∥2..

2.2F2step 1.1algebra

Let S2ϵ={x∈Q:dist⁡(x,∂Q)<2ϵ}. It is covered by at most Cdϵ1−d cubes of the lattice ϵ(k+Y): along each of the 2d faces there are at most a fixed number of normal layers and at most Cdϵ−(d−1) tangential cells. Each cell contributes at most ϵd∥g∥L2(Y)2 to ∫∣g(x/ϵ)∣2. Thus ∥g(⋅/ϵ)∥L2(S2ϵ)≤Cdϵ∥g∥L2(Y) for every periodic g∈L2(Y). Applying this to χj and ∇χj, and differentiating wϵ−Uϵ=ϵ(ηϵ−1)∑jχj(x/ϵ)gj, gives ∥∇(wϵ−Uϵ)∥2≤Cϵ: the three product-rule terms are bounded respectively by C∥∇χj(⋅/ϵ)∥L2(S), Cϵ∥χj(⋅/ϵ)∥L2(S), and Cϵ∥∇ηϵ∥∞∥χj(⋅/ϵ)∥L2(S).

3.1F1step 2.1step 2.2F6F5algebra∎

The residual for wϵ is the residual for Uϵ plus ∫Qa(x/ϵ)∇(wϵ−Uϵ)⋅∇v. By [F1], steps 2.1 and 2.2, its magnitude is at most Cϵ∥∇v∥2. Put eϵ=uϵ−wϵ∈H01(Q) and test the difference equation with eϵ. Coercivity gives λ∥∇eϵ∥22≤Cϵ∥∇eϵ∥2, so ∥∇eϵ∥2≤Cϵ (trivial if it vanishes). Finally [F6] gives ∥eϵ∥2≤Cϵ, while wϵ−u0=ϵηϵ∑jχj(x/ϵ)gj has L2 norm at most Cϵ by [F5]. The triangle inequality proves both claimed bounds.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Energy identity for FE-HMM micro tensor error

Statement

For a fixed macro sample K in Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes, let bK be its sampled coefficient, wK,p∈V# the full periodic cell solution, and wK,ph∈WM its micro P1 solution from Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves. Set ∥∇v∥bK2=∫YbK∣∇v∣2. Then p⋅(AKh−AKex)p=∥∇(wK,ph−wK,p)∥bK2≥0, and for any zh∈WM, ∥∇(wK,ph−wK,p)∥bK≤∥∇(zh−wK,p)∥bK. In particular ∥AKh−AKex∥op≤ηK2, where ηK=sup⁡∣p∣=1inf⁡zh∈WM∥∇(zh−wK,p)∥bK and ∥M∥op=sup⁡∣p∣=1∣Mp∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The full and finite periodic cell equations use the same scalar coefficient bK, the micro space is a subspace of V#, and both solutions are unique.

[F1]

Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes: WM⊂V# and the full/discrete sampled equations use the same bK.

[F2]

Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves: both cell solutions exist uniquely and their tensor energy representation is symmetric.

[F3]

Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: the cell variational equation holds for every test in V#.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3algebra

Write ep=wK,ph−wK,p. Subtracting the two variational equations gives ∫YbK∇ep⋅∇zh=0 for every zh∈WM. Thus ep is orthogonal in the bK gradient inner product to the whole micro space. For any zh, ∥∇(wK,p−zh)∥bK2=∥∇ep∥bK2+∥∇(wK,ph−zh)∥bK2, which proves the best-approximation inequality.

2.1F2step 1.1F1algebra∎

For p,q∈R2, the symmetric energy representation in [F2] and the full/discrete equations imply p⋅(AKh−AKex)q=∫YbK∇ep⋅∇eq. Indeed, expanding the two energy bilinear forms leaves this term; each cross term vanishes by testing the full equation with the difference in V# or the discrete equation with a micro function in WM. Taking q=p proves the identity. For unit p,q, Cauchy--Schwarz bounds the right side by ∥∇ep∥bK∥∇eq∥bK≤ηK2 by step 1.1. The supremum over unit vectors is the operator norm, giving the final bound.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

FE-HMM macro, micro, and sampling error separation

Statement

Let UH be the FE-HMM solution from Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes on a matching macro triangulation of Q=(0,1)2, and let u0∈H01(Q) solve the homogenized equation with coefficient A∗. For each macro cell let AKex be the exact periodic-coupling sampled tensor and AKh its discrete micro tensor. Define Δmicro=max⁡K∥AKh−AKex∥op,Δres=max⁡K∥AKex−A∗∥op,Δ=Δmicro+Δres, and ηH=inf⁡V∈VH∥∇(u0−V)∥L2(Q). If Δ<λ, then ∥∇(UH−u0)∥2≤λ+Λλ−Δ ηH+Δλ−Δ ∥∇u0∥2. The first term is macro best approximation; the second is explicitly split by Δmicro and Δres. By Energy identity for FE-HMM micro tensor error, Δmicro≤max⁡KηK2. If every micro ratio is an integer, No sampling resonance for period-aligned periodic micro cells gives Δres=0. The condition Δ<λ is a sufficient perturbation condition; no arbitrary-scale accuracy is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite conforming macro mesh of the unit square, its continuous zero-boundary P1 space, positive cell weights summing to area, uniformly elliptic symmetric local micro tensors, a homogenized solution, and the exact sampled tensors.

[F1]

Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes: BH(U,V)=∑K∣K∣∇U∣K⋅AKh∇V∣K and the macro equation has right side ∫QfV.

[F2]

Well-posedness of the finite FE-HMM micro solves: each AKh is symmetric and λ-elliptic; the macro system has a unique solution.

[F3]

Energy identity for FE-HMM micro tensor error: ∥AKh−AKex∥op≤ηK2.

[F4]

No sampling resonance for period-aligned periodic micro cells: integer period ratios give AKex=A∗.

[F5]

Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor: A∗ is symmetric with λI≤A∗≤ΛI.

[F6]

Compatible 2D newest-vertex-bisection meshes and Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity: the selected macro triangulation is finite, conforming, and covers Q‾ with disjoint cell interiors.

Proof

1.1F2F5F1F6F7algebra

By [F2] the macro solution and all local tensors are well defined. Write DK=AKh−A∗ and D0=max⁡K∥DK∥op. The triangle inequality gives D0≤Δ. For macro functions V,W, piecewise constancy of their P1 gradients and Cauchy--Schwarz over the finite cells imply ∣BH(V,W)−∫QA∗∇V⋅∇W∣≤D0∥∇V∥2∥∇W∥2. By [F5] the reference form is at least λ∥∇V∥22, so [F1] and D0≤Δ<λ also give BH(V,V)≥(λ−Δ)∥∇V∥22.

2.1F5step 1.1F1algebra

Fix any VH∈VH and put eH=UH−VH. Since both macro and homogenized equations have the same load, for every test in VH, BH(eH,eH)=∫QA∗∇(u0−VH)⋅∇eH+(∫QA∗∇VH⋅∇eH−BH(VH,eH)). The right side has magnitude at most (Λ∥∇(u0−VH)∥2+D0∥∇VH∥2)∥∇eH∥2 by [F5] and step 1.1. Combining with coercivity in step 1.1 and ∥∇VH∥2≤∥∇u0∥2+∥∇(u0−VH)∥2 gives ∥∇(UH−u0)∥2≤λ+Λλ−D0∥∇(u0−VH)∥2+D0λ−D0∥∇u0∥2. This also holds if eH=0, when division is unnecessary.

3.1F3F4step 2.1algebra∎

Take a sequence VH whose approximation errors decrease to ηH; finite-dimensionality ensures the infimum is finite, and the displayed inequality passes to the limit. The two coefficient functions are increasing for 0≤D0≤Δ<λ, so replace D0 by Δ to obtain the stated estimate. Finally, the exact decomposition AKh−A∗=(AKh−AKex)+(AKex−A∗) gives the separate micro and resonance terms, with their micro-space and aligned-sampling interpretations from [F3]–[F4].

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources