Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous matching piecewise polynomials belong to W1p

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let T be a finite matching affine simplicial mesh of a bounded polyhedral open set Ω, let 1≤p≤∞, and let v be a real-valued scalar member of the conforming piecewise-polynomial space in Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh. Then v∈W1,p(Ω). Its weak gradient agrees almost everywhere on each cell with the ordinary cellwise polynomial gradient.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a finite matching mesh, v polynomial on each cell with equal polynomial traces across every interior facet, 1≤p≤∞, and φ∈Cc∞(Ω).

[F1]

The conforming condition is equality of the two polynomial traces on each whole interior facet. (Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh)

[F2]

A C1 field on a simplex satisfies the cellwise Gauss–Green formula. (Gauss–Green formula on an affine simplex)

[F3]

The two outward normals on an interior matching facet are opposite, so its oriented contributions cancel when cell boundaries are summed. (Interior facet orientations cancel in a matching mesh)

[F4]

A weak first derivative is characterized by integration against compactly supported smooth tests, and W1,p consists of Lp classes whose weak first derivatives lie in Lp. (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

[F5]

Countable Choice is the explicit background assumption in the Sobolev-space definition. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

Proof

1.1F2given

If T=∅, then Ω=∅ by the mesh definition; v is the unique zero class in W1,p(Ω) and the cellwise-gradient assertion has no cells. Assume now T≠∅. The mesh is finite and each cellwise polynomial and its ordinary first derivatives are bounded on the closed cell. Thus v and the piecewise function gi=∂i(v∣K) belong to Lp(Ω) for every 1≤p≤∞. Fix a coordinate i and a test function φ∈Cc∞(Ω). On each cell apply [F2] to G=(vφ)ei to obtain ∫Kv ∂iφ dx=−∫Kgiφ dx+∑F⊂∂K∫Fvφ(nK,F)i dS.

2.1F1F3F4F5step 1.1∎

Sum these finitely many identities over K. On an interior facet, [F1] gives a common trace for vφ and [F3] gives opposite outward normals, so the two flux integrals cancel. On a boundary facet, φ=0 because its support is compact in Ω. Therefore ∫Ωv ∂iφ dx=−∫Ωgiφ dx. By [F4], gi is the weak ith derivative. This holds for every coordinate i; all gi are in Lp, so v∈W1,p(Ω) with the stated cellwise gradient.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources