Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

hp finite elements and spectral elements — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples apply the fixed-box analytic p estimate, compute the degree-two GLL mass correction, and give a two-cell SIPDG counterexample showing why a fixed penalty fails as degree grows. On one L-shaped polygon, the reentrant-corner example proves both the local fixed-degree h lower bound of order h2/3 and the global e−bN1/3 hp upper bound on the stated geometrically graded meshes. Its Dirichlet set is exactly the two edges where the corner mode vanishes; no zero condition is imposed on the other edges.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A degree-independent SIPDG penalty loses coercivity

Statement refuted

For the symmetric interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin (SIPDG) form, choosing a penalty coefficient η independent of polynomial degree always makes the form coercive on discontinuous piecewise polynomials.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integer p≥2, fixed η>0, the two unit intervals, and the stated interior jump, average, and bilinear form.

[F1]

Weighted Jacobi endpoint kernel on the reference interval for d=1 gives shifted orthogonal polynomials ϕn on [0,1] with ∥ϕn∥22=1/(2n+1).

Counterexample

Use the two-cell mesh (−1,0)∪(0,1) with cell size one, natural exterior boundary, degree p on each cell, jump [v]=v(0−)−v(0+), average derivative {v′}=(v′(0−)+v′(0+))/2, and symmetric interior penalty form

ah(v,v)=∑K∫K∣v′∣2−2{v′}[v]+η[v]2,

where η>0 is fixed independent of p.

1.1F1givenalgebra

For d=1, the Rodrigues polynomial in [F1] is ϕn(t)=(−1)nDn(tn(1−t)n)/n!. Its value at t=1 is 1: writing s=1−t, the first nonzero term of tn(1−t)n=(1−s)nsn is sn, and Dtn=(−1)nDsn. Define Kp−1(t)=∑n=0p−1(2n+1)ϕn(t). Orthogonality, the norm in [F1], and ϕn(1)=1 give Kp−1(1)=∑n=0p−1(2n+1)=p2, ∫01Kp−1=1, and ∥Kp−1−1∥22=p2−1.

2.1F1step 1.1givenalgebra∎

Put qp=(Kp−1−1)/2. Then deg⁡qp≤p−1, ∫01qp=0, qp(1)=(p2−1)/2, and ∫01qp2=(p2−1)/4. Define vp(x)=1+∫0x+1qp(t) dt on (−1,0) and vp(x)=0 on (0,1). Its cell restrictions have degree at most p, its jump is 1, its left derivative at the interface is qp(1), and its right derivative is 0. Therefore the broken derivative energy is (p2−1)/4 and the interface flux term is −2(qp(1)/2)(1)=−(p2−1)/2. Substituting into the stated form yields ah(vp,vp)=η−(p2−1)/4, which is negative whenever p2>4η+1. Meanwhile ∑K∥vp′∥22+[vp]2=(p2−1)/4+1>0. This disproves coercivity for every fixed η once p is sufficiently large.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The degree-two GLL mass matrix changes only its highest Legendre mode

Example

For p=2, the one-dimensional Legendre basis (P0,P1,P2) has exact mass matrix diag⁡(2,2/3,2/5), whereas the GLL quadrature mass matrix is diag⁡(2,2/3,1). The only change is the top mode, with correction 3/5.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: p=2, P0=1, P1=x, P2=(3x2−1)/2, and the GLL definition.

[F1]

Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto nodes, weights, and tensor quadrature: the p=2 nodes are −1,0,1 with weights defined by integrating their cardinal polynomials.

[F2]

GLL quadrature changes only the top Legendre modes and is p-uniformly equivalent: for degree p, the GLL squared-norm defect is 2(p+1)/(p(2p+1)) times the squared top Legendre coefficient.

[F3]

Legendre polynomials have explicit norms and weighted derivative orthogonality: ∫−11PnPm=2δnm/(2n+1).

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

Since P2′(x)=3x, its interior GLL node is 0, and the two endpoints complete the nodes. The cardinal polynomials are ℓ−1=x(x−1)/2, ℓ0=1−x2, and ℓ1=x(x+1)/2. Integrating them gives weights 1/3,4/3,1/3.

2.1F2F3step 1.1givenalgebra∎

Legendre orthogonality [F3] gives the exact diagonal entries ∫P02=2, ∫P12=2/3, and ∫P22=2/5. The nodes and weights in step 1.1 give Q2(P02)=2, Q2(P12)=2/3, and Q2(P22)=1. Every cross product has degree at most three, so exactness through degree 2p−1=3 makes the off-diagonal entries zero. The top correction is 1−2/5=3/5, which agrees with [F2] at p=2 and top coefficient 1.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A reentrant-corner mode separates fixed-degree h error from hp error

Example

Assume Countable Choice for the hp comparison. Let

Ω=((−1,1)×(0,1))∪((−1,0)×(−1,1)),

the L-shaped polygon with reentrant corner at the origin. In polar coordinates about the origin, Ω lies in 0<θ<3π/2. Define

u(r,θ)=r2/3sin⁡(2θ/3).

This mode vanishes on exactly the two boundary edges ending at the origin, which are the fixed Dirichlet set ΓD; no zero boundary value is imposed on the outer edges. Let T^ be a fixed nondegenerate closed triangle with one vertex at the origin and T^∖{0}⊂Ω. Choose h0>0 so Th=hT^⊂Ω‾ for 0<h≤h0. For each fixed integer degree p≥0 there is cp>0 such that

inf⁡q∈Pp(Th)∣u−q∣H1(Th)≥cph2/3.

This gives a local lower bound for fixed-degree approximation; if Th is itself one cell of a piecewise-polynomial mesh and its local degree is p, it also bounds below the global error on that mesh. In contrast, on any nested matching shape-regular corner-graded mesh family satisfying the hypotheses of Exponential hp energy convergence for weighted-analytic polygon corners, with uniform total degrees pk≃k and zero values imposed only on ΓD,

inf⁡vk∈Vk∣u−vk∣H1(Ω)≤Ce−bNk1/3.

The diagram records the reentrant sector and the two boundary edges in ΓD. The proof uses the coordinate description above, not the picture.

¡Dc=(0;0)u(r;µ)µ=0µ=3¼=2

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The L-shaped polygon and mode just defined; polar exponent λ=2/3; a fixed nondegenerate closed triangle T^ with vertex 0 and punctured interior in Ω; h0>0 such that Th⊂Ω‾ for 0<h≤h0; integer p≥0; and Countable Choice for the hp comparison.

[F1]

On an affine simplex of size h, the local degree-p approximation space is Pp and the hp conformity convention is matching polynomial traces. (Variable-degree conforming hp spaces on matching affine meshes)

[F2]

Every finite-dimensional subspace of a normed space is closed, including the gradient image of Pp(T^). (A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed)

[F3]

The geometric corner theorem proves the best-approximation rate for the stated weighted-analytic class, grading law, uniform degree law, and boundary set. (Exponential hp energy convergence for weighted-analytic polygon corners)

[F4]

The weighted pointwise supplier verifies the continuous representative and the meaning of its boundary values for the corner class. (Weighted analytic polygon functions have corner decay and scaled analytic bounds)

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

With λ=2/3, polar differentiation gives ∣u∣=rλ∣sin⁡(λθ)∣ and ∣∇u∣2=λ2r2λ−2. The polygon is bounded, and the area element is r dr dθ, so u∈L2(Ω) and ∇u∈L2(Ω) because ∫0Rr2λ+1dr and ∫0Rr2λ−1dr are finite at zero. The origin is on the boundary and u is smooth in Ω, so these classical derivatives are its weak derivatives; hence u∈H1(Ω).

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

In the polar orthonormal frame the Hessian entries are urr=λ(λ−1)rλ−2sin⁡(λθ), urθorth=λ(λ−1)rλ−2cos⁡(λθ), and uθθorth=λ(1−λ)rλ−2sin⁡(λθ). Counting both symmetric off-diagonal entries gives ∣D2u∣2=2λ2(1−λ)2r2λ−4. Its area integral contains ∫01r2λ−3dr=∫01r−5/3dr=∞. If u∈H2, its weak Hessian agrees with its classical Hessian on every punctured sub-sector, contradicting this divergent integral. Thus u∉H2(Ω).

2.2F3F4step 1.1givenalgebra

On the sector, u=Im⁡z2/3 for the branch 0<arg⁡z<3π/2. Repeated differentiation gives ∑∣α∣=j∣Dαu∣≤Cjj!r2/3−j. Set β0=1/2 at the origin and βi=0 at every other polygon corner. The other-corner factors in Φβ+j−2 are bounded above by Cj on the bounded polygon; the origin factor changes the radial power to r1/2+j−2+2/3−j=r−5/6. Hence the squared weighted integral near the origin is bounded by C2j(j!)2∫0Rr−5/3r dr, which is finite. Away from the origin the mode has a local analytic branch at every point of the closure, so all remaining weighted integrals are bounded by another C2j(j!)2 factor. Since j!/(j−2)!=j(j−1)≤2j, the bound is at most (2C)j(j−2)!; taking du=max⁡(1,2C) and Cu=du2 proves the exact Bβ2 factorial bound in [F3]. The pointwise supplier [F4] then gives the continuous representative.

3.1F1F2step 2.1given

Define cp=inf⁡q∈Pp(T^)∥∇(u−q)∥L2(T^). The gradients of Pp(T^) form a finite-dimensional, hence closed, subspace of L2(T^;R2) by [F2]. If cp=0, then ∇u lies in the closure of that subspace, hence equals ∇q almost everywhere for some q∈Pp(T^). Both gradients are continuous on the punctured open triangle. If they differed at one point, continuity would give a nonempty open rectangle on which they differ, contradicting their almost-everywhere equality. Thus they agree throughout that open set; differentiating gives D2u=D2q. Since the nondegenerate triangle T^ has a vertex at the origin, its interior contains a sector of positive angle near 0, and the same radial Hessian integral computed in step 2.1 diverges on that sector. This contradicts the bounded polynomial Hessian and proves cp>0.

4.1F1step 3.1givenalgebra

For any qh∈Pp(Th) set q^(y)=h−2/3qh(hy)∈Pp(T^). Homogeneity u(hy)=h2/3u(y) and the change of variables x=hy give ∥∇x(u−qh)∥L2(Th)=h2/3∥∇y(u−q^)∥L2(T^)≥cph2/3. Taking the infimum proves the asserted local lower bound. If Th is one mesh cell of degree p, restricting any global finite-element error to that cell gives the same lower bound.

5.1F3F4step 1.1step 4.1step 2.2given∎

The mode vanishes on the two edges θ=0 and θ=3π/2, so it satisfies precisely the boundary condition on ΓD. Step 2.2 verifies u∈Bβ2(Ω) for the stated weights. Applying [F3] to any mesh and uniform degree sequence satisfying its geometric grading, cell-count, and degree hypotheses proves the global hp upper estimate on this same polygon. Together with step 4.1 this is the stated fixed-degree local h lower bound versus global hp upper bound. No outer-edge zero condition is used.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

An analytic box solution has exponential Galerkin p convergence

Example

Assume Countable Choice.

On the single reference square Ω=(−1,1)2 let u(x,y)=1/(4−x) and use a(v,w)=∫Ω(∇v⋅∇w+vw) on H1(Ω) with exact load F(w)=a(u,w). For every p≥1, the tensor-degree-p conforming Galerkin solution up satisfies

∥u−up∥H1(Ω)≤C 13(34)p

for a fixed constant C.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, p≥1, u(x,y)=(4−x)−1 on [−1,1]2, and H1 with norm ∥v∥H12=∥v∥22+∥∇v∥22.

[F1]

Analytic data converge exponentially under fixed-mesh p refinement: on the fixed box, reference derivative bounds M∣ν∣!R−∣ν∣ with R−1<q<1 yield a trace-matching polynomial with H1 error at most CR,qMqp.

[F2]

Cea transfers the fixed-mesh analytic p rate to the energy error: the exact coercive problem transfers this best approximation rate to its conforming Galerkin solution.

[F3]

Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs: the inner-product Cauchy–Schwarz inequality bounds ∣a(v,w)∣ by ∥v∥H1∥w∥H1.

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

For a multi-index ν=(n,j), Dνu=0 when j>0, while ∂xnu(x,y)=n!(4−x)−n−1. Since 4−x≥3 on the square, ∣Dνu∣≤13∣ν∣!2−∣ν∣ in every case. Thus the hypothesis of [F1] holds with M=1/3, R=2, and q=3/4.

2.1F2F3step 1.1given∎

The form a is the H1 inner product. By [F3], F(w)=a(u,w) is bounded, and u is the exact variational solution by its definition. Applying [F2] with the constants established in step 1.1 gives ∥u−up∥H1≤C(1/3)(3/4)p.

Sources