Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A reentrant-corner mode separates fixed-degree h error from hp error

Example

Assume Countable Choice for the hp comparison. Let

Ω=((−1,1)×(0,1))∪((−1,0)×(−1,1)),

the L-shaped polygon with reentrant corner at the origin. In polar coordinates about the origin, Ω lies in 0<θ<3π/2. Define

u(r,θ)=r2/3sin⁡(2θ/3).

This mode vanishes on exactly the two boundary edges ending at the origin, which are the fixed Dirichlet set ΓD; no zero boundary value is imposed on the outer edges. Let T^ be a fixed nondegenerate closed triangle with one vertex at the origin and T^∖{0}⊂Ω. Choose h0>0 so Th=hT^⊂Ω‾ for 0<h≤h0. For each fixed integer degree p≥0 there is cp>0 such that

inf⁡q∈Pp(Th)∣u−q∣H1(Th)≥cph2/3.

This gives a local lower bound for fixed-degree approximation; if Th is itself one cell of a piecewise-polynomial mesh and its local degree is p, it also bounds below the global error on that mesh. In contrast, on any nested matching shape-regular corner-graded mesh family satisfying the hypotheses of Exponential hp energy convergence for weighted-analytic polygon corners, with uniform total degrees pk≃k and zero values imposed only on ΓD,

inf⁡vk∈Vk∣u−vk∣H1(Ω)≤Ce−bNk1/3.

The diagram records the reentrant sector and the two boundary edges in ΓD. The proof uses the coordinate description above, not the picture.

¡Dc=(0;0)u(r;µ)µ=0µ=3¼=2

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The L-shaped polygon and mode just defined; polar exponent λ=2/3; a fixed nondegenerate closed triangle T^ with vertex 0 and punctured interior in Ω; h0>0 such that Th⊂Ω‾ for 0<h≤h0; integer p≥0; and Countable Choice for the hp comparison.

[F1]

On an affine simplex of size h, the local degree-p approximation space is Pp and the hp conformity convention is matching polynomial traces. (Variable-degree conforming hp spaces on matching affine meshes)

[F2]

Every finite-dimensional subspace of a normed space is closed, including the gradient image of Pp(T^). (A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed)

[F3]

The geometric corner theorem proves the best-approximation rate for the stated weighted-analytic class, grading law, uniform degree law, and boundary set. (Exponential hp energy convergence for weighted-analytic polygon corners)

[F4]

The weighted pointwise supplier verifies the continuous representative and the meaning of its boundary values for the corner class. (Weighted analytic polygon functions have corner decay and scaled analytic bounds)

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

With λ=2/3, polar differentiation gives ∣u∣=rλ∣sin⁡(λθ)∣ and ∣∇u∣2=λ2r2λ−2. The polygon is bounded, and the area element is r dr dθ, so u∈L2(Ω) and ∇u∈L2(Ω) because ∫0Rr2λ+1dr and ∫0Rr2λ−1dr are finite at zero. The origin is on the boundary and u is smooth in Ω, so these classical derivatives are its weak derivatives; hence u∈H1(Ω).

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

In the polar orthonormal frame the Hessian entries are urr=λ(λ−1)rλ−2sin⁡(λθ), urθorth=λ(λ−1)rλ−2cos⁡(λθ), and uθθorth=λ(1−λ)rλ−2sin⁡(λθ). Counting both symmetric off-diagonal entries gives ∣D2u∣2=2λ2(1−λ)2r2λ−4. Its area integral contains ∫01r2λ−3dr=∫01r−5/3dr=∞. If u∈H2, its weak Hessian agrees with its classical Hessian on every punctured sub-sector, contradicting this divergent integral. Thus u∉H2(Ω).

2.2F3F4step 1.1givenalgebra

On the sector, u=Im⁡z2/3 for the branch 0<arg⁡z<3π/2. Repeated differentiation gives ∑∣α∣=j∣Dαu∣≤Cjj!r2/3−j. Set β0=1/2 at the origin and βi=0 at every other polygon corner. The other-corner factors in Φβ+j−2 are bounded above by Cj on the bounded polygon; the origin factor changes the radial power to r1/2+j−2+2/3−j=r−5/6. Hence the squared weighted integral near the origin is bounded by C2j(j!)2∫0Rr−5/3r dr, which is finite. Away from the origin the mode has a local analytic branch at every point of the closure, so all remaining weighted integrals are bounded by another C2j(j!)2 factor. Since j!/(j−2)!=j(j−1)≤2j, the bound is at most (2C)j(j−2)!; taking du=max⁡(1,2C) and Cu=du2 proves the exact Bβ2 factorial bound in [F3]. The pointwise supplier [F4] then gives the continuous representative.

3.1F1F2step 2.1given

Define cp=inf⁡q∈Pp(T^)∥∇(u−q)∥L2(T^). The gradients of Pp(T^) form a finite-dimensional, hence closed, subspace of L2(T^;R2) by [F2]. If cp=0, then ∇u lies in the closure of that subspace, hence equals ∇q almost everywhere for some q∈Pp(T^). Both gradients are continuous on the punctured open triangle. If they differed at one point, continuity would give a nonempty open rectangle on which they differ, contradicting their almost-everywhere equality. Thus they agree throughout that open set; differentiating gives D2u=D2q. Since the nondegenerate triangle T^ has a vertex at the origin, its interior contains a sector of positive angle near 0, and the same radial Hessian integral computed in step 2.1 diverges on that sector. This contradicts the bounded polynomial Hessian and proves cp>0.

4.1F1step 3.1givenalgebra

For any qh∈Pp(Th) set q^(y)=h−2/3qh(hy)∈Pp(T^). Homogeneity u(hy)=h2/3u(y) and the change of variables x=hy give ∥∇x(u−qh)∥L2(Th)=h2/3∥∇y(u−q^)∥L2(T^)≥cph2/3. Taking the infimum proves the asserted local lower bound. If Th is one mesh cell of degree p, restricting any global finite-element error to that cell gives the same lower bound.

5.1F3F4step 1.1step 4.1step 2.2given∎

The mode vanishes on the two edges θ=0 and θ=3π/2, so it satisfies precisely the boundary condition on ΓD. Step 2.2 verifies u∈Bβ2(Ω) for the stated weights. Applying [F3] to any mesh and uniform degree sequence satisfying its geometric grading, cell-count, and degree hypotheses proves the global hp upper estimate on this same polygon. Together with step 4.1 this is the stated fixed-degree local h lower bound versus global hp upper bound. No outer-edge zero condition is used.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources