Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Periodic scalar Dirichlet homogenization on the unit cube

Statement

Let Q=(0,1)d, let a be a measurable Zd-periodic scalar coefficient with 0<λ≤a≤Λ, and let f∈L2(Q). For ϵ>0 let uϵ∈H01(Q) be the unique weak solution ∫Qa(x/ϵ)∇uϵ⋅∇v=∫Qfv(v∈H01(Q)). Let u0∈H01(Q) be the unique solution with A∗ from Periodic correctors and effective tensor in place of a(x/ϵ)I. Then as ϵ↓0, uϵ⇀u0 in H01(Q).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The measurable periodic scalar ellipticity bounds, the corrector cell equation, two-scale compactness and gradient decomposition, periodic averaging, Lax--Milgram, and Countable Choice.

[F1]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data: a is measurable and periodic, λ≤a≤Λ, and the physical coefficient is a(x/ϵ).

[F2]

Periodic scalar cell problem, Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors, and Periodic correctors and effective tensor: the mean-zero corrector exists uniquely, depends linearly on its vector argument, and defines the flux average A∗p.

[F3]

Symmetry and uniform ellipticity of the effective tensor: A∗ is symmetric and λI≤A∗≤ΛI.

[F4]

Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: H01(Q) is Hilbert, separable, satisfies ∥v∥2≤∥∇v∥2, and bounded sequences are compact in L2.

[F5]

The Lax--Milgram theorem: bounded coercive forms on a Hilbert space have unique weak solutions.

[F6]

Two-scale structure of bounded H1-zero gradients: along any ϵn>0 with ϵn→0, a bounded H01 sequence has a subsequence with two-scale gradient limit ∇u+∇yu1 and un⇀u in H01.

[F7]

Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube and The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: periodic rescalings have uniform L2 bounds and weak cell-mean limits, and Fourier characters are complete in periodic L2.

[F8]

Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure: H01(Q) is the norm closure of Cc∞(Q), so the homogenized variational identity extends from compactly supported smooth tests.

[F9]

Weak topology on a normed space: weak convergence is convergence under every bounded linear functional.

[F10]

Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space and The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: H#1(Y) is the H1 closure of smooth periodic functions, V# is its zero-mean subspace, and Parseval applies to each smooth periodic function and its first derivatives; step 1.2 proves the required rational trigonometric density from these facts.

[F11]
[F12]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: the section integrals used to define Fw are measurable and obey the iterated-integral identities for the integrable products below.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice supplies the subsequences and the countable dense trigonometric test family; neither full Choice nor Dependent Choice is used.

Proof

1.1F4F5F3F1algebra

Equip H01(Q) with gradient norm, equivalent to its Sobolev norm by [F4]. The form bϵ(u,v)=∫Qa(x/ϵ)∇u⋅∇v is bounded by Λ∥∇u∥2∥∇v∥2 and coercive with constant λ; F(v)=∫Qfv is bounded by ∥f∥2∥∇v∥2. Thus [F5] gives a unique uϵ. The same argument using [F3] gives a unique u0. Testing with uϵ gives ∥∇uϵ∥2≤λ−1∥f∥2 (with the zero-gradient case immediate).

1.2F10algebra

For smooth periodic mean-zero w, let w^(k) be its Fourier coefficients and PNw=∑∣k∣≤Nw^(k)e2πik⋅y. Periodic integration by parts gives ∂jw^(k)=2πikjw^(k). Parseval [F10], applied to w and all its first derivatives, yields ∥w−PNw∥H1(Y)2=∑∣k∣>N(1+4π2∣k∣2)∣w^(k)∣2⟶0. The zero coefficient vanishes, and the symmetric truncation preserves reality. For each finite truncation, approximate its finitely many coefficients by rational real and imaginary parts while imposing c−k=ck‾; this gives a countable family of rational-coefficient, real, mean-zero trigonometric polynomials dense in the smooth periodic mean-zero functions in H1(Y). If v∈V#, choose a smooth periodic w arbitrarily close to v in H1 by [F10], then replace w by w−∫Yw; since ∫Yv=0, this subtraction still approximates v. The rational polynomials are therefore dense in all of V#.

2.1F6F4step 1.1A1algebra

Fix any sequence ϵn→0. Apply [F6] to the bounded solutions. Along a subsequence, uϵn⇀u in H01, strongly in L2, and ∇uϵn two-scale converges to ∇u+∇yu1 for u1∈L2(Q;V#). It remains to identify u.

3.1F7F1F6step 2.1algebra

Fix ϕ,η∈Cc∞(Q) and a smooth periodic w(y). The oscillating test vn(x)=ϕ(x)+ϵnη(x)w(x/ϵn) lies in H01(Q) and has gradient ∇ϕ+η∇yw(x/ϵn)+ϵnw(x/ϵn)∇η. The last term contributes a quantity tending to zero by boundedness of ∇uϵn and the uniform rescaling bound [F7]. On the other terms, two-scale convergence gives ∫Q×Ya(y)(∇u+∇yu1)⋅(∇ϕ+η∇yw)=∫Qfϕ, where the test may contain the measurable factor a(y): approximate each a(y) times a smooth periodic factor in L2(Y) by smooth Fourier sums and use the uniform rescaling bound [F7] and boundedness of ∇uϵn. The right side converges because ϵnηw(x/ϵn)→0 in L2.

4.1step 3.1F11F12algebra

Set ϕ=0 in step 3.1 and let η∈Cc∞(Q) be arbitrary. For each smooth periodic w, this gives ∫Qη(x)Fw(x) dx=0, where Fw(x):=∫Ya(y)(∇u(x)+∇yu1(x,y))⋅∇yw(y) dy. For almost every x, Cauchy--Schwarz in y gives ∣Fw(x)∣≤Λ∥∇yw∥L2(Y)(∣∇u(x)∣+∥∇yu1(x,⋅)∥L2(Y)). The right side belongs to L2(Q) because u∈H01(Q) and u1∈L2(Q;V#). The absolute value of the integrand is integrable on Q×Y, so Tonelli applied to its positive and negative parts gives measurability of the section integral [F12]. Thus Fw∈L2(Q). Since its pairing with every η∈Cc∞(Q) vanishes, density [F11] implies Fw=0 almost everywhere.

5.1step 4.1step 1.2F10A1F2algebra

Use [A1] to take one common full-measure set for the countable dense family from step 1.2, and intersect it with the full-measure set where u1(x,⋅)∈V# and ∇u(x) is defined. For each such x, the cell functional is continuous in the H1 norm, so the equation extends from that dense family to every w∈V#. Uniqueness in [F2] yields u1(x,⋅)=χ∇u(x) in V#.

6.1step 3.1step 5.1F2F8F5F3algebra

Now use step 3.1 with w=0. Step 5.1 and the flux definition [F2] identify its averaged flux as ∫Ya(∇u+∇yu1)=A∗∇u. Therefore ∫QA∗∇u⋅∇ϕ=∫Qfϕ for every ϕ∈Cc∞(Q). Density [F8] and boundedness of the form extend this to all test functions in H01(Q), so uniqueness in [F5] gives u=u0.

7.1step 2.1step 6.1F9F4algebra∎

Every sequence ϵn→0 has a subsequence weakly converging to u0 by steps 2.1–6.1. If the family failed to converge weakly to u0, [F9] would give a bounded linear functional and a sequence ϵn→0 whose scalar values stay a fixed positive distance from its value at u0; the subsequence just obtained contradicts that. Thus the full weak convergence holds.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

100 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources