Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-scale structure of bounded H1-zero gradients

Statement

Let Q=Y=(0,1)d, ϵn>0 with ϵn→0, and (un) be bounded in H01(Q). There are a subsequence, u∈H01(Q), and u1∈L2(Q;V#) such that un⇀u in H01(Q), un→u in L2(Q), and ∇un⇀2∇xu(x)+∇yu1(x,y). Here vector-valued two-scale convergence means componentwise convergence as in Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests, and L2(Q;V#) denotes product-measurable functions whose y-slices lie in V# almost everywhere and whose squared H1(Y) slice norms are integrable over Q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded sequence in H01(Q), positive scales ϵn→0, compact L2 inclusion and separability on the cube, two-scale compactness, the periodic Poincare inequality, and Fourier completeness on the torus.

[F1]

Separable H1-zero space and compact L2 inclusion on a cube: H01(Q) is separable and Hilbert and its bounded sequences have L2-convergent subsequences.

[F2]

A bounded sequence in a separable Hilbert space has a weakly convergent subsequence: bounded sequences in a separable Hilbert space have weakly convergent subsequences under Countable Choice.

[F3]

Two-scale compactness for bounded L2 sequences and Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests: bounded scalar L2 sequences have two-scale convergent subsequences along positive scales ϵn→0.

[F4]

Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube: periodic L2 rescalings are uniformly bounded and converge weakly to their cell means.

[F5]

Zero-mean periodic Sobolev cell space and Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: V# is the mean-zero periodic H1 closure and its gradient has zero cell mean.

[F6]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: periodic Fourier characters form a complete orthonormal basis and Parseval holds.

[F7]

Weak derivative of a locally integrable function: weak derivatives satisfy integration by parts against compactly supported smooth tests.

[F8]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: iterated integrals may be interchanged for the integrable products used below.

[F9]

Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L2: Cc∞(Q) is dense in L2(Q), so an L2 function pairing to zero with every such test is zero almost everywhere.

[F10]

The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps: for smooth Φ(x,y) and the sampling map x↦(x,x/ϵn), the chain rule differentiates Φ(x,x/ϵn) in x by ∇xΦ+ϵn−1∇yΦ.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is the only choice axiom used in subsequence and countable-density selections.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3A1algebra

By [F1]–[F2], first extract a subsequence converging weakly in H01(Q) to some u∈H01(Q), and then a further subsequence converging strongly in L2(Q) to the same u. By [F3], extract successive further subsequences on which each of the d components of ∇un two-scale converges; since there are finitely many components, one subsequence works for all. Write its vector limit as G(x,y).

2.1F4F3step 1.1algebra

For every allowed product test ϕ(x)ψ(y), strong L2 convergence and the uniform sampled-test bound in [F4] show that replacing un by u in its pairing changes the limit by zero. Weak L2 averaging in [F4], applied to ψ(x/ϵn) against uϕ∈L2(Q), then gives limit ∫Quϕ∫Yψ. Thus the two-scale limit of un is the y-independent function u(x).

2.2F2F3F8F9step 1.1algebra

Set H(x,y):=G(x,y)−∇xu(x). For a smooth compactly supported ϕ(x) and constant vector c, test gradient convergence componentwise with ϕc. Ordinary weak H1 convergence gives ∫Q×YG⋅ϕc=∫Q∇u⋅ϕc. By Cauchy--Schwarz and Tonelli [F8], x↦∫YH(x,y) dy lies in L2(Q) and pairs to zero with every ϕ∈Cc∞(Q); [F9] makes it zero almost everywhere.

3.1F7F8F10step 2.1F3step 2.2algebra

Let Φ(x,y)=∑rϕr(x)Ψr(y) be a smooth periodic vector field, compactly supported in x, with div⁡yΦ=0, and put Φn(x)=Φ(x,x/ϵn). By [F10], div⁡Φn=(div⁡xΦ)(x,x/ϵn)+ϵn−1(div⁡yΦ)(x,x/ϵn)=(div⁡xΦ)(x,x/ϵn). The field Φn is a valid compactly supported smooth test in the weak-derivative identity [F7], so ∫Q∇un⋅Φn=−∫Qundiv⁡Φn. Taking limits by componentwise two-scale convergence for the two allowed tests Φ and div⁡xΦ gives ∫Q×YG⋅Φ=−∫Q×Yu div⁡xΦ=∫Q×Y∇xu⋅Φ, where the last equality is weak integration by parts. Thus H is orthogonal to every such divergence-free field.

4.1step 3.1F9A1step 2.2F6algebra

For every nonzero k∈Zd and every real c⊥k, use slow tests ϕ(x)ccos⁡(2πk⋅y) and ϕ(x)csin⁡(2πk⋅y) in step 3.1. They are divergence-free in y. The resulting pairings show that each real and imaginary component of H^(x,k)⋅c pairs to zero with every ϕ∈Cc∞(Q), so [F9] makes it zero almost everywhere. There are countably many k and a finite basis of each k⊥, so [A1] permits one null set outside which H^(x,k) is parallel to k for all k; the zero coefficient is zero by step 2.2.

5.1step 4.1F6F8F5A1algebra∎

For k≠0 define u^1(x,k)=(H^(x,k)⋅k)/(2πi∣k∣2) and set u^1(x,0)=0. The parallel property from step 4.1 gives 2πiku^1(x,k)=H^(x,k). Moreover ∣u^1(x,k)∣≤∣H^(x,k)∣/(2π∣k∣), so Parseval [F6] and Tonelli [F8] give ∫Q∑k(1+∣k∣2)∣u^1(x,k)∣2dx≤Cd∥H∥L2(Q×Y)2. For almost every x, the sum is finite; the partial Fourier sums over ∣k∣≤N are then Cauchy in H1(Y) by Parseval, and their limit belongs to H#1(Y) because each partial sum is smooth periodic. The zero coefficient makes this limit mean-zero. Define u1 as the product-space L2(Q×Y) limit of these partial sums. Their y-gradients converge there, and the coefficient identity identifies the gradient limit with H. Conjugate symmetry makes the limit real, and the integrated estimate gives the stated square-integrable H1(Y) slice norm. Hence u1∈L2(Q;V#) with ∇yu1=H, completing the decomposition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources