Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-scale compactness for bounded L2 sequences

Statement

Let Q=Y=(0,1)d, let ϵn↓0 (monotonicity may be dropped; only ϵn→0 is used), and suppose (un) is bounded in L2(Q). Then some subsequence two-scale converges in the sense of Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests to a function u∈L2(Q×Y).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded real L2(Q) sequence, positive scales tending to zero, periodic rescaling, density of smooth product tests, Countable Choice, real Bolzano--Weierstrass, and Hilbert Riesz representation.

[F1]

Two-scale weak convergence for periodic tests: convergence is tested against finite sums of compactly supported smooth slow factors and smooth periodic fast factors.

[F2]

Periodic averaging and rescaling bounds on the unit cube: for every fixed smooth product test Φ, ∥Φ(⋅,⋅/ϵn)∥L2(Q)→∥Φ∥L2(Q×Y); this follows by applying periodic averaging to ∣Φ(x,y)∣2.

[F4]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): a point can be selected from each member of a fixed countable family of nonempty sets; this will select the dense test family.

[F5]

Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence: bounded real scalar sequences have convergent subsequences.

[F6]

L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space and Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces: every bounded real linear functional on L2(Q×Y) is integration against a unique L2 function.

[F7]

Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of Lp(Rn) for 1≤p<∞: the finite-measure product space is separable, consistently with the dense test family in [F3].

Proof

1.1F7F3F4F2F5algebra

Let M=sup⁡n∥un∥2. By [F7], extend functions by zero to see that L2(Q×Y) is separable; [F3] says the allowed test subspace is dense there. Intersect a countable base of its metric topology with that subspace and, using [F4], choose one point from every nonempty intersection. The rational span of these points is a countable dense family D. For each fixed Φ∈D, Cauchy--Schwarz gives ∣∫Qun(x)Φ(x,x/ϵn)dx∣≤M∥Φ(⋅,⋅/ϵn)∥2, which is bounded by [F2]. For a bounded real sequence (bn) fix this extraction rule: let m be the least positive integer bounding every ∣bn∣, start with [−m,m], bisect repeatedly, and retain the left closed half when it contains infinitely many terms, otherwise the right closed half. From the rth retained interval take the term with least index larger than the previously selected index. Such indices exist; nestedness and vanishing interval lengths make the selected sequence Cauchy, and [F5] makes it convergent. This uniquely specified extraction map requires no choice. Enumerate D, recursively apply this map to each scalar pairing on the current subsequence, and take as nr the rth index of the rth nested subsequence. The indices increase strictly and their tail lies in every fixed earlier subsequence, so all pairings with D converge. Recursion of the specified map does not use Dependent Choice.

2.1step 1.1F2F3algebra

Denote the limit on D by L0. For each Φ∈D, step 1.1 and [F2] give ∣L0(Φ)∣≤M∥Φ∥L2(Q×Y). Limits preserve rational linearity; the bound makes L0 uniformly continuous, so it has a unique continuous extension L to all of the real Hilbert space L2(Q×Y), with ∥L∥≤M. To verify real homogeneity, first fix Φ∈D and t∈R, and choose rationals qm→t. Since qmΦ∈D, L(qmΦ)=qmL0(Φ); continuity and qmΦ→tΦ give L(tΦ)=tL(Φ). For arbitrary h∈L2(Q×Y), choose Φj∈D with Φj→h; then tΦj→th, and continuity gives L(th)=tL(h). Additivity also passes from D by continuity, so L is bounded and real-linear.

3.1F6F2F1F3step 2.1algebra∎

By [F6], choose u∈L2(Q×Y) such that L(Φ)=∫Q×YuΦ. Fix any allowed smooth product test Ψ and choose Φj∈D with Φj→Ψ in product L2. Along the extracted subsequence, [F2] applied to Ψ−Φj gives lim sup⁡n∣∫Qun(Ψ−Φj)(x,x/ϵn)dx∣≤M∥Ψ−Φj∥2. Also ∣L(Ψ−Φj)∣≤M∥Ψ−Φj∥2. Since the pairings for Φj converge to L(Φj), letting j→∞ proves convergence for Ψ to L(Ψ)=∫uΨ. This is precisely the two-scale convergence in [F1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources