How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compatible 2D newest-vertex-bisection meshes
Definition
A compatible labeled initial mesh is a finite matching affine simplicial triangulation of a polygon in as in Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity, equipped with labels on its edges such that each triangle has one edge labeled and two labeled , and every shared edge has the same label from both incident triangles. Matching means that distinct cell interiors are disjoint and any nonempty cell intersection is a whole common face: in two dimensions it may be a vertex or an edge. For a descendant triangle of generation , its three edge labels, in any order, are . The unique edge labeled is its reference edge.
To bisect , join the midpoint of its reference edge to the opposite vertex. The two resulting triangles have generation . In each child, the two new half-edges and the bisector receive label ; the one inherited nonreference edge retains label and is the child's reference edge. A finite bisection forest is the collection of the initial triangles and all descendants reached by finitely many such bisections; its leaves form a triangulation when all shared-edge subdivisions agree. The admissible family consists of the matching conforming leaf triangulations generated by these compatible bisections. A refinement means every cell of lies in a cell of .
For deterministic operational ordering, fix a finite starting mesh in this family and a total order of its cells. Enumerate those operational roots as in that order; this starting mesh may already be a geometric descendant of , and operational numbering does not reset its generations or edge labels. Give root identifier and order its three vertices lexicographically by their two real coordinates. If a parent has identifier , with a finite binary word, let be the earlier endpoint of its labeled reference edge in its stored vertex list, let be the other endpoint, let be the opposite vertex, and let . Its children with vertex sets and receive identifiers and , respectively. Each child's stored vertex list is the parent list restricted to its two retained vertices, in their previous order, followed by . These lists are bookkeeping orders, independent of the orientation convention for affine reference maps. Compare identifiers first by root rank, then lexicographically by binary word, with and a proper prefix before its extensions. This is a total order, so every finite nonempty pending set has a unique least identifier. Distinct roots or distinct binary paths have distinct identifiers, and a retained cell keeps its identifier and vertex list through all subsequent calls. This operational decoration changes no geometric bisection, reference edge, admissible triangulation or finite-element space.
The compatible initial labeling is a hypothesis, not a consequence of an arbitrary initial triangulation. This definition is two-dimensional and makes no claim about three-dimensional closure or complexity.
Interface
The geometry and closure properties of this family are separate theorems on the same page.
Depends on
Used by
- Delaunay-seeded curved uniform NVB refinement Algorithm
- Dorfler marking and conforming newest-vertex refinement Algorithm
- Periodic FE-HMM with simplicial macro and periodic P1 micro meshes Algorithm
- The P1 AFEM approximation class Definition
- A coarse mesh can miss the convection smallness condition Example
- Common NVB refinement and overlay cardinality Lemma
- Conforming NVB closure preserves curved shared traces Lemma
- Dorfler marking is cardinality-optimal up to mesh closure Lemma
- Localized energy estimate for nested Galerkin solutions Lemma
- Quasi-orthogonality for constant convection on a fine initial mesh Lemma
- Shape regularity and local reduction under 2D newest-vertex bisection Lemma
- Termination and cumulative complexity of NVB conformity closure Lemma
- FE-HMM macro, micro, and sampling error separation Theorem
- Linear contraction of AFEM energy error and oscillation Theorem
- Optimal P1 AFEM complexity for the Laplacian Theorem
- Quality and finite termination for the curved square NVB family Theorem
- Residual reliability and local efficiency for P1 AFEM Theorem
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bonito, Canuto, Nochetto & Veeser, Adaptive Finite Element Methods (2024) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cascón, Kreuzer, Nochetto & Siebert, Quasi-optimal convergence rate for an AFEM (standard reference, not scraped)