How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dorfler marking is cardinality-optimal up to mesh closure
Statement
Assume Countable Choice for the Sobolev and residual-estimator suppliers.
Assume , is constant on each initial cell, and is a conforming descendant. Let and be the exact P1 Galerkin energy error and residual estimator. Let be another conforming NVB descendant of with exact Galerkin solution . If for some , then the cells subdivided in the overlay form a Dörfler set with parameter where is the localized refinement constant and the global efficiency constant. Consequently the deterministic smallest-cardinality Dörfler set for any fixed has cardinality at most .
Facts & Assumptions
Countable Choice is assumed in the cited Sobolev and reference-simplex suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Given: Countable Choice, the symmetric Laplace problem, piecewise constant on , conforming P1 Galerkin solutions on nested meshes, and the comparison error decrease.
If is P0 on , then its projection oscillation vanishes on every descendant; global efficiency and reliability give (Residual indicators and data oscillation for P1 AFEM, Residual reliability and local efficiency for P1 AFEM).
The energy errors of nested symmetric Galerkin solutions satisfy Pythagorean orthogonality (Quasi-orthogonality for constant convection on a fine initial mesh).
A nested refinement localizes the Galerkin correction to the estimator on the coarse cells it subdivides (Localized energy estimate for nested Galerkin solutions).
The overlay is the smallest common conforming refinement and has the cardinality bound (Common NVB refinement and overlay cardinality).
Proof
Let and let be the exact Galerkin solutions. Best approximation on the overlay gives . By [F2], By [F3], this correction square is at most , where is the set of coarse cells subdivided in . By [F1], . Combining proves . If , then the comparison condition and all indicators are zero and the empty set is Dörfler.
The bulk algorithm sorts nonnegative weights in decreasing order. Among all sets of a fixed size , the first sorted weights have maximal sum: replacing any omitted larger weight for a selected smaller one cannot decrease the sum, and repeating yields the prefix. Therefore the shortest prefix reaching threshold has minimum cardinality among all Dörfler sets. Since is such a set whenever , . The overlay cardinality bound [F4] gives .
Depends on
- The P1 AFEM approximation class
- Compatible 2D newest-vertex-bisection meshes
- Residual reliability and local efficiency for P1 AFEM
- Common NVB refinement and overlay cardinality
- Localized energy estimate for nested Galerkin solutions
- Galerkin orthogonality for conforming approximations
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Residual indicators and data oscillation for P1 AFEM
- Quasi-orthogonality for constant convection on a fine initial mesh
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ricardo H. Nochetto, Adaptive Finite Element Methods, Lecture 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cascón, Kreuzer, Nochetto & Siebert, Quasi-optimal convergence rate for an AFEM (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bonito, Canuto, Nochetto & Veeser, Adaptive Finite Element Methods (2024) (standard reference, not scraped)