Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dorfler marking is cardinality-optimal up to mesh closure

Statement

Assume Countable Choice for the Sobolev and residual-estimator suppliers.

Assume b=0, f is constant on each initial cell, and T is a conforming descendant. Let eT and ηT be the exact P1 Galerkin energy error and residual estimator. Let T∗ be another conforming NVB descendant of T0 with exact Galerkin solution U∗. If eT∗≤λeT for some 0<λ<1, then the cells subdivided in the overlay T⊕T∗ form a Dörfler set with parameter θ∗=(1−λ2)/(ClocCeff)>0, where Cloc is the localized refinement constant and Ceff the global efficiency constant. Consequently the deterministic smallest-cardinality Dörfler set for any fixed 0<θE≤min⁡(1,θ∗) has cardinality at most #T∗−#T0.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed in the cited Sobolev and reference-simplex suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Given: Countable Choice, the symmetric Laplace problem, f piecewise constant on T0, conforming P1 Galerkin solutions on nested meshes, and the comparison error decrease.

[F1]

If f is P0 on T0, then its projection oscillation vanishes on every descendant; global efficiency and reliability give Ceff−1ηT2≤eT2≤CrelηT2 (Residual indicators and data oscillation for P1 AFEM, Residual reliability and local efficiency for P1 AFEM).

[F2]

The energy errors of nested symmetric Galerkin solutions satisfy Pythagorean orthogonality (Quasi-orthogonality for constant convection on a fine initial mesh).

[F3]

A nested refinement localizes the Galerkin correction to the estimator on the coarse cells it subdivides (Localized energy estimate for nested Galerkin solutions).

[F4]

The overlay is the smallest common conforming refinement and has the cardinality bound #(T⊕T∗)≤#T+#T∗−#T0 (Common NVB refinement and overlay cardinality).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Let T+=T⊕T∗ and let U,U∗,U+ be the exact Galerkin solutions. Best approximation on the overlay gives eT+≤eT∗≤λeT. By [F2], ∥∇(U+−U)∥22=eT2−eT+2≥(1−λ2)eT2. By [F3], this correction square is at most ClocηT(R)2, where R is the set of coarse cells subdivided in T+. By [F1], ηT2≤CeffeT2. Combining proves ηT(R)2≥θ∗ηT2. If eT=0, then the comparison condition and all indicators are zero and the empty set is Dörfler.

2.1F4step 1.1algebra∎

The bulk algorithm sorts nonnegative weights in decreasing order. Among all sets of a fixed size m, the first m sorted weights have maximal sum: replacing any omitted larger weight for a selected smaller one cannot decrease the sum, and repeating yields the prefix. Therefore the shortest prefix reaching threshold θEηT2 has minimum cardinality among all Dörfler sets. Since R is such a set whenever θE≤θ∗, ∣ME∣≤∣R∣. The overlay cardinality bound [F4] gives ∣R∣≤#T+−#T≤#T∗−#T0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources