Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

No sampling resonance for period-aligned periodic micro cells

Statement

For any dimension d, phase θ∈Rd, and positive integer m, let b(y)=a(θ+my) on Y. Let wp∈V# be the unique mean-zero minimizer of ∫Yb(y)∣p+∇v(y)∣2dy and define Aθ,mexp=∫Yb(y)(p+∇wp(y))dy. Then Aθ,mex=A∗ for every p∈Rd. Thus a micro side length δ=mϵ has zero continuum sampling/resonance error, regardless of phase; a separate finite micro-space error can remain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a is scalar, measurable, Zd-periodic, uniformly elliptic; χp is its mean-zero exact corrector; the local periodic-coupling cell space is V#.

[F1]

Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: if m is a positive integer, then b(y)=a(θ+my) is a measurable, unit-periodic coefficient with the same ellipticity bounds; pullback preserves the a.e. periodicity and bounds.

[F2]

Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: χp solves the cell equation and A∗p is the mean corrector flux.

[F3]

Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: subtracting the mean fixes the potential without changing its gradient, and mean-zero periodic gradients integrate to zero.

[F4]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: Fourier expansions and Parseval are valid for periodic L2 fluxes.

[F5]

Affine pullback of weak derivatives and Sobolev seminorms: affine pullback preserves H1 membership and applies the weak chain rule to the periodic corrector.

[F6]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: the phase-shifted affine pullback preserves measurable classes and transforms nonnegative integrals by its determinant; signed integrals follow by positive and negative parts.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6algebra

Since mk∈Zd for each k∈Zd, periodicity of a gives b(y+k)=b(y) a.e.; the exceptional null sets pull back to null sets by [F6]. Bounds are preserved by the same affine pullback [F1]. Hence the generic cell-corrector result [F2] applies to b and gives its unique mean-zero cell solution; energy expansion around that solution shows it is the unique minimizer in the Statement. Set vm(y)=m−1χp(θ+my)−c, where c is its mean on Y. Periodic smooth approximants to χp converge on every bounded union of cells, and affine pullback [F5] shows vm∈V# with ∇yvm=∇χp(θ+my). The flux q(z)=a(z)(p+∇χp(z)) is periodic and divergence-free by the cell equation. Test the cell equation with the mean-zero real and imaginary parts of e−2πik⋅z for k≠0. Their gradients are the corresponding parts of −2πike−2πik⋅z, so combining the two zero identities gives k⋅q^(k)=0 (and the identity is automatic at k=0). For a Fourier polynomial, q(θ+my) has only frequencies mk, with coefficients multiplied by phases, and each remains perpendicular to mk; hence it is divergence-free. For any periodic h∈L2(Y), affine change of variables [F6] gives ∫Y∣h(θ+my)∣2dy=m−d∫θ+mY∣h(z)∣2dz. The latter box meets at most (m+2)d unit lattice cells, so periodicity bounds this by m−d(m+2)d∥h∥L2(Y)2. Thus composition with y↦θ+my is bounded on periodic L2, and the divergence-free identity passes from Fourier polynomials to q in L2. Therefore ∫Yb(y)(p+∇vm)⋅∇z=0 for every smooth periodic z, and by density for every z∈V#. Uniqueness of the cell solution for b identifies it with vm.

2.1F6F2step 1.1algebra∎

The sampled tensor flux is ∫Yq(θ+my)dy. By [F6], applied to the positive and negative parts of each component, this equals m−d∫θ+mYq(z)dz. The box θ+mY is a union, up to null boundaries, of md cells θ+k+Y with integer k, so periodicity makes each cell integral equal to ∫θ+Yq. A translated unit cell has the same integral as Y: partition it at the integer coordinate faces and translate each resulting piece by an integer lattice vector into Y; applying [F6] to positive and negative parts and using periodicity gives equality componentwise. Thus the average is ∫Yq=A∗p. This holds for all p, so the sampled tensor is exactly A∗.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources