How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
No sampling resonance for period-aligned periodic micro cells
Statement
For any dimension , phase , and positive integer , let on . Let be the unique mean-zero minimizer of and define . Then for every . Thus a micro side length has zero continuum sampling/resonance error, regardless of phase; a separate finite micro-space error can remain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is scalar, measurable, -periodic, uniformly elliptic; is its mean-zero exact corrector; the local periodic-coupling cell space is .
Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data and A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: if is a positive integer, then is a measurable, unit-periodic coefficient with the same ellipticity bounds; pullback preserves the a.e. periodicity and bounds.
Periodic correctors and effective tensor and Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors: solves the cell equation and is the mean corrector flux.
Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell: subtracting the mean fixes the potential without changing its gradient, and mean-zero periodic gradients integrate to zero.
The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: Fourier expansions and Parseval are valid for periodic fluxes.
Affine pullback of weak derivatives and Sobolev seminorms: affine pullback preserves membership and applies the weak chain rule to the periodic corrector.
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: the phase-shifted affine pullback preserves measurable classes and transforms nonnegative integrals by its determinant; signed integrals follow by positive and negative parts.
Proof
Since for each , periodicity of gives a.e.; the exceptional null sets pull back to null sets by [F6]. Bounds are preserved by the same affine pullback [F1]. Hence the generic cell-corrector result [F2] applies to and gives its unique mean-zero cell solution; energy expansion around that solution shows it is the unique minimizer in the Statement. Set , where is its mean on . Periodic smooth approximants to converge on every bounded union of cells, and affine pullback [F5] shows with . The flux is periodic and divergence-free by the cell equation. Test the cell equation with the mean-zero real and imaginary parts of for . Their gradients are the corresponding parts of , so combining the two zero identities gives (and the identity is automatic at ). For a Fourier polynomial, has only frequencies , with coefficients multiplied by phases, and each remains perpendicular to ; hence it is divergence-free. For any periodic , affine change of variables [F6] gives . The latter box meets at most unit lattice cells, so periodicity bounds this by . Thus composition with is bounded on periodic , and the divergence-free identity passes from Fourier polynomials to in . Therefore for every smooth periodic , and by density for every . Uniqueness of the cell solution for identifies it with .
The sampled tensor flux is . By [F6], applied to the positive and negative parts of each component, this equals . The box is a union, up to null boundaries, of cells with integer , so periodicity makes each cell integral equal to . A translated unit cell has the same integral as : partition it at the integer coordinate faces and translate each resulting piece by an integer lattice vector into ; applying [F6] to positive and negative parts and using periodicity gives equality componentwise. Thus the average is . This holds for all , so the sampled tensor is exactly .
Depends on
- Uniformly elliptic periodic scalar diffusion data
- Periodic correctors and effective tensor
- Existence and uniqueness of periodic cell correctors
- Mean-zero Poincare inequality on the periodic cell
- The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus
- Affine pullback of weak derivatives and Sobolev seminorms
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Patrick Ciarlet Jr. and Christian Stohrer, Finite-element heterogeneous multiscale method for the Helmholtz equation (standard reference, not scraped)