Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Few induced copies exclude a fixed labelled blowup

Statement

Let J be nonempty with j=J, and t1 an integer. If indJ(G)<(t/j)j, no (t,1/j)-blowup of J exists in G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty j-vertex graph J, integer t1, and indJ(G)<(t/j)j.

[F1]

From Good copy extension count: Every good embedding of J[I], IV(J), has at least (t/j)jI good extensions to J.

Proof

1.1

Suppose such a blowup exists. Its unique empty good embedding has at least (t/j)j good full extensions by [F1] with I=.

assume-contraF1
2.1

Every good extension is an induced embedding, so indJ(G)(t/j)j, contradicting the strict hypothesis. Therefore the blowup cannot exist.

step 1.1discharge-contradiction

Source notes

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources