Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Special copy trichotomy produces a restricted blockade

Statement

For every nonempty finite graph H there exist k1,k2>0 such that, whenever G is nonempty, n=G, 0<x1/(8H) and indH(G)<xk1nH, there is a QID x-restricted sequence of length at least 2log2(1/x) and width at least xk2n. At least half its indices form a sequence uniformly x-sparse in G or its complement, so that sequence has length at least log2(1/x) and the same width lower bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty finite pattern H. The host G and x obey the statement, with the copy threshold imposed after the constants are chosen.

[F1]

Given H,g,α, the maximal-blowup trichotomy supplies constants β,γ>0 for all hosts of order n2 and 0<x1/(8H): a few-(Hg) subset of size at least xβn, at least xγnH copies, or an x-sparse pair with sizes at least xβn and n/(2H). (Qid maximal blowup trichotomy).

[F2]

QID sequences allow empty blocks. Restrictedness means that each later union is directionally sparse to its earlier block in one fixed graph or complement for that index. (Qid restricted blockade with empty blocks).

[F3]

For every real y, its unique integer part satisfies yy<y+1. (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with mx<m+1).

[F4]

logbx=logxlogb,blogbx=x,logb(bu)=u(uR). (Change of base and inversion of the positive-base real exponential).

Proof

1.1

Induct on h=H. If h=1, take k1=k2=1; the premise n<xn is impossible. For h2, fix gV(H) and let k1,k2 be the constants for Hg. Apply [F1] with α=k1 to obtain β,γ. Set d0=log2(2h)>0, k1=γ+2d0h, and k2=k2+β+2d0.

baseihF1
2.1

If xk2n<1, take 2log2(1/x) empty blocks. By [F3] this integer is at least the required length, and the width is 0=xk2n. All degree conditions hold by [F2]. Hence assume xk2n1.

F2F3step 1.1
3.1

Consider nonempty restricted sequences (B1,,Bk) whose first k1 blocks have size at least xk2n and whose last block has size at least (2h)1kn. The one-block sequence V(G) qualifies. All these sequences have length at most n, so a maximum length is attained in a finite nonempty family. Fix such a sequence. If k12log2(1/x), its first k1 blocks prove the restricted assertion. Otherwise [F4] gives Bk2(1k)d0n>x2d0nx2d0k2>1. Thus Bk2.

F4step 2.1algebra
4.1

Apply [F1] inside G[Bk] at x with α=k1. Its count outcome would give indH(G)indH(G[Bk])xγBkh>xγ+2d0hnh=xk1nh, contrary to the premise; the first inequality holds by inclusion of the embedding sets. Its sparse-pair outcome would replace Bk by A,B with AxβBk>xβ+2d0nxk2n and BBk/(2h)(2h)kn. Earlier degree conditions persist because their target blocks are unchanged and their later vertices are restricted. The new pair meets the last condition, contradicting maximum length.

F1step 1.1step 3.1
5.1

Therefore [F1] supplies ABk with AxβBk>xβ+2d0n and indHg(G[A])<xk1Ah1. Here A is nonempty and x1/(8h)1/(8(h1)), so induction applies. It gives length at least 2log2(1/x) and width at least xk2Axk2+β+2d0n=xk2n. Floor monotonicity follows from [F3]: if uv and u>v, then uv+1>v. This completes the restricted-sequence induction.

F1F3step 1.1step 4.1induction
6.1

In the resulting sequence assign an index to I if its later union is x-sparse to its block in G, and to J otherwise. Restrictedness ensures the latter indices use G; the last index can be assigned to I because its tail is empty. One of the two sets has at least half the indices. Retain its blocks in their old order. Each later union has only shrunk, so its degree inequalities remain true, and each retained block has its old size. This proves the uniform conclusion.

F2step 1.1step 5.1algebradischarge-induction

Source notes

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources