How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite planar graph disk cuts and Euler count
Statement
Assume the axiom of choice. Let be a closed round disk with boundary circle , and let be a finite embedded graph. Its edges are regular piecewise embeddings of compact intervals, with nonzero one-sided derivatives at their endpoints; their relative interiors are pairwise disjoint and avoid the finite vertex set. At each vertex, the outward one-sided tangent rays of incident edges are pairwise distinct. Suppose that is a union of edges and that every meeting of edges or of an edge with is a vertex. Parallel edges between two vertices are allowed. Then finitely many vertex subdivisions and additional polygonal arcs produce an augmented finite graph with the following properties:
(i) is connected and contains with every original edge preserved (possibly subdivided);
(ii) every face of , meaning a component of , has closure a closed disk whose boundary is a simple cycle of ;
(iii) the disk decomposition is face-to-face: two closed faces meet in a common vertex, in a common full edge, or not at all;
(iv) with the numbers of vertices, edges and faces of , counting boundary vertices and boundary edges, .
Each added arc has relative interior in a face of the graph at the instant it is added, and is piecewise smooth. The conclusion applies in a regular surface chart whenever its image satisfies the stated endpoint and tangent hypotheses.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The regular embedded finite graph and distinct tangent rays in the Statement. Full AC is assumed because the two in-run Jordan/plane-graph suppliers below assume it (The Axiom of Choice).
A connected open subset of the plane is polygonally connected (Every connected component of an open subset of is open and polygonally connected).
An interior polygonal crosscut of a Jordan disk splits it into two Jordan disks; the finite-plane-graph ear proof gives the crosscut step (Finite plane graph ear and face facts, proof 1.3; Jordan–Schönflies extension for plane curves).
Every finite 2-connected graph with at least three vertices has an ear decomposition beginning with any specified cycle (Finite plane graph ear and face facts, proof 1.2). The arbitrary-Jordan polygonal-crosscut region argument in that item's proof 1.3 is extended below to the regular graph's possibly nonpolygonal ear arcs using the plane homeomorphism of [F2].
Proof
A regular edge has a well-defined nonzero tangent ray at each endpoint. On a sufficiently short initial interval its radial distance from that endpoint is strictly increasing: the derivative of squared radial distance is . Its image lies in an arbitrarily narrow cone about that ray. Finiteness and distinct incident rays therefore give a small vertex disk in which each incident edge is one radial germ and every sector between consecutive germs contains a smaller straight wedge. At an interior point of an edge a regular local parametrization gives the usual two sides. These assertions persist when a new edge starts strictly inside an existing free wedge.
Subdivide so that it is a cycle with at least three vertices. For each pair of parallel edges subdivide all but one at a distinct regular interior point. The resulting graph is simple; each subdivision changes by , introduces two opposite rays at its new vertex, and creates no zero sector between distinct incident edge germs. The positive free sectors needed below are the sectors on either side of that subdivided edge. Existing incident rays at old vertices are unchanged.
Polygonal crosscut fact. If a connected open face has distinct boundary vertices and selected free sectors there, choose short straight segments from each endpoint strictly inside its sector. Their inner endpoints lie in . Join them by a polygonal path in using [F1], perturbing finitely many collinear overlaps if needed. The finite planar union of this path and the two initial segments contains a simple path from to ; choosing the first departure at and last arrival at retains short straight subsegments in the prescribed sectors. Equivalently, erase loops and shorten the endpoint segments at their finitely many intersections with the middle path. This gives a simple polygonal arc with interior in , and with strictly positive sectors on either side at both endpoints.
Connect components. Start with the component containing . If another compact component exists, a shortest segment between this component and the union of the other components gives, after stopping at its first encountered component, an open segment in a common face with endpoints on different components. At an endpoint interior to a regular edge, subdivision makes it a vertex and the shortest segment is normal to that edge; at an old vertex it enters a free sector after an arbitrarily small generic perturbation in that face. Apply step 2.2 in those sectors, so the joined graph retains the local positive-sector property. Each addition reduces the component count, hence finitely many give a connected graph.
Remove cut vertices. Let be a cut vertex of the connected simple graph, and let be the components of . Around some consecutive incident germs belong to different ; their other endpoints lie on the boundary of the face occupying that sector and are not adjacent (an edge would connect the two components without ). Step 2.2 joins inside that face without crossing the graph. For the fixed finite vertex set define , where counts connected components. Adding this edge strictly decreases the summand for and cannot increase any summand, since deleting any fixed vertex from the augmented graph only adds an edge or changes nothing. Thus decreases. The construction introduces no vertex and keeps the graph simple, so after finitely many additions : the graph has at least three vertices, is connected, and has no cut vertex.
Apply the rooted ear decomposition of [F3] to the 2-connected simple graph of step 3.2, starting with the boundary cycle . We prove by induction that every face inside has a Jordan graph cycle as its exact frontier and that . The initial drawing has one bounded face and one exterior face by [F2], and . Suppose the invariant holds for a partial drawing , and add its next ear , a finite chain of simple graph edges with distinct old endpoints , with all internal vertices new and its relative interior disjoint from . As every edge lies in , the connected relative interior of lies in one bounded face of . Its frontier is a graph cycle by induction, and is the bounded component of : otherwise a polygonal path inside that component from to an omitted point would first leave through its frontier , a contradiction. Let be the two -- arcs of . Each is a Jordan curve, even though need not be polygonal. The region-label proof of the crosscut claim in [F2]'s ear supplier applies verbatim except for its local-two-side sentence: at any choose a neighbourhood disjoint from ; the Schönflies plane homeomorphism of the Jordan curve in [F2] gives a smaller neighbourhood in which the common arc has exactly two connected local sides. Thus the two new Jordan curves label opposite sides of every interior point of , and the same component/frontier argument splits into exactly two bounded faces whose exact frontiers are and . Every other face stays unchanged. If the ear has edges, it adds vertices, edges and one face, preserving . Induction covers the complete drawing. In particular each is a Jordan disk by [F2], and its cycle vertices have positive occupied sectors by step 1.1.
Fix one such face with boundary cycle , . Apply step 2.2 inside it from to , using strict interior rays, and select an interior point on one straight segment of that crosscut. Subdivide the crosscut at . By [F2], it cuts off the Jordan triangle with vertices and old boundary edge ; its other Jordan face contains . Choose in the straight part so the remaining face has a positive sector at .
In the remaining face add, successively for , a polygonal crosscut from to with endpoint rays strictly inside its positive sectors. The crosscut splitting fact [F2] gives at stage one Jordan triangle and one remaining Jordan disk containing the not-yet-used vertices. The final remainder is . All faces are triangular Jordan disks and each has exactly one edge inherited from the boundary of the old face. Repeating this finite construction in each old face yields only finitely many new edges and vertices.
The new triangles within one old face form a fan: distinct closed triangles meet in one whole spoke, the hub , a common boundary vertex, or not at all. Across different old faces, a new triangle contains only one old boundary edge, so two such triangles can share at most that whole edge or a vertex. Regular graph edges have disjoint relative interiors, and added arcs are interior to their selected faces; thus no other intersection is possible. This proves the stated face-to-face property.
The connected graph before the fan has by the induction of step 4.1. Its exterior face is the unique component outside . A boundary or interior edge subdivision adds one vertex and one edge; a crosscut between existing boundary vertices adds one edge and one bounded face. The hub subdivision and every fan split therefore preserve for faces inside . Consequently the final counts satisfy . All original edges persist up to subdivision and every added edge is polygonal, establishing (i)–(iv). The exact AC use is through the arbitrary-Jordan-curve suppliers in [F2]; finite choices and the rooted ear selection of [F3] need no AC.
Source locator
Diestel, Graph Theory, 6th edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2, Proposition 4.2.8, printed p. 100, discusses maximal plane graphs with triangular faces. The proof here uses a sequential fan instead. The rooted ear decomposition and polygonal-crosscut region argument are in lem-finite-plane-graph-ear-and-face-facts, proofs 1.2–1.3; step 4.1 supplies the needed extension to the regular graph's nonpolygonal ear arcs using Jordan–Schönflies. Lee, Chapter 9, Problem 9-5, printed pp. 171–172, and Jost, §2.3.A, printed pp. 31–39, give downstream context; neither establishes this boundary disk-cut statement.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 6th edition, Chapter 4 preview (standard reference, not scraped)
- John M. Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature (1997) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jürgen Jost, Compact Riemann Surfaces: An Introduction to Contemporary Mathematics (standard reference, not scraped)