Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stokes formula for finite ordinary surface corners

Statement

Let M be an oriented smooth surface without boundary, let D⊆M be a compact regular oriented surface region with finitely many ordinary corners, and let η be a smooth 1-form on a neighbourhood of D. Then

∫Ddη=∫∂Dη,

where the boundary integral is the sum over the finitely many positively oriented C2 boundary arcs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The oriented smooth surface M, the compact region D, its supplied finite piecewise-C2 boundary decomposition with ordinary corners, and the form η.

[F1]

The boundary of D is a finite disjoint union of simple closed curves made from regular C2 arcs; near a smooth point D occupies one side of the arc, and at a vertex it occupies one sector bounded by the two incident arcs. The one-sided tangent rays are distinct (Regular oriented surface regions with corners).

[F2]

For a compact set inside an open subset of a smooth manifold, there is a smooth bump equal to 1 near that compact set and supported in the open set (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set).

[F3]

Any finite indexed family of nonempty sets admits a choice function (Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values); this is finite choice only.

[F4]

In a positive chart, the coefficient of a compactly supported top form is integrated in its coordinates. Multiplication by 1D preserves Riemann integrability because the finitely many boundary arcs are locally graphs of content zero. On chart overlaps, the compactly supported change-of-variables formula compares these integrals; a finite overlap refinement therefore makes the finite chart sum independent of the chosen localization (Chart integral with its orientation sign, A compactly supported Riemann integrand admits the global change-of-variables formula from a diffeomorphism near the relevant compact preimage, The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm has content zero in Rm+1).

[F5]

A compact region between two continuous graphs is Jordan measurable, and continuous integrands integrate by vertical sections (A region between two continuous graphs is Jordan measurable, and a continuous integrand extending to its closure integrates by vertical sections).

[F6]

If G is continuous on [a,b], differentiable on (a,b), and its interior derivative has an integrable extension, then that extension integrates to G(b)−G(a) (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).

[F7]

A compactly supported smooth 1-form on R2 has exterior derivative with integral zero (Compact-support Stokes on Euclidean space).

[F8]

In positive coordinates, if α=P dx+Q dy, then dα=(Qx−Py) dx∧dy. Along a C2 arc γ(t)=(x(t),y(t)), its line integral is ∫(Px′+Qy′) dt=∫αγ(t)(γ′(t)) dt, which is coordinate invariant because it evaluates the covector on the tangent. It is the scalar product line integral of (P,Q) with γ′. The exterior-derivative formula follows by evaluating the invariant formula on the coordinate fields, whose bracket is zero; finite subdivision does not change the line-integral sum (A smooth differential k-form, The exterior derivative by the invariant vector-field formula, Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals, The piecewise-C1 line-integral sums do not depend on the admissible partition).

[F9]

The positive boundary direction is selected by the outward-normal-first rule (Induced boundary orientation).

Proof

technique · finite localization and graph integration
1.1F1F4given

If D=∅, both integrals are zero. For nonempty D, every boundary arc is locally a C2 graph, so the finite boundary has content zero in each chart meeting it. Thus a smooth top-form coefficient multiplied by 1D is Riemann integrable in every relatively compact chart.

2.1F1F2F3F4F8step 1.1chooseconstruct

Cover D by positive coordinate rectangles lying inside Int⁡D, rectangles where a smooth boundary arc is a graph and D lies on one side, and corner rectangles where the two incident arcs form a continuous piecewise-C2 graph and D lies on one side. At a corner, the two oriented one-sided tangent vectors are not negative multiples by [F1]; after normalizing them in any linear coordinates, their sum defines a linear coordinate whose differential is positive on both. Thus the boundary is a continuous graph across the corner. Compactness gives a finite refinement by smaller chart neighbourhoods Vi⋐Ui of these types still covering D. Use [F2] to choose bi=1 near Vi‾ with compact support in Ui; [F3] justifies these finitely many choices. The sum B=∑ibi is positive on a neighbourhood of D. Use [F2] once more to choose ψ=1 near D with compact support in {B>0}, and set ρi=ψbi/B on {B>0}, extended by zero. Then ∑iρi=1 near D, each ρi is smooth and compactly supported in Ui, and η=∑iρiη near D. This finite partition defines ∫D as the sum of the Riemann chart integrals of the localized top forms over D. If a second such partition is used, the products ρiρ~j form a finite partition near D subordinate to chart overlaps. On each overlap the transition is a diffeomorphism with positive Jacobian, so [F4] and compactly supported change of variables identify the corresponding terms and the resulting sums agree. The coordinate boundary integral is ∫η(γ˙) on each supplied arc, so its finite chart localization is the same intrinsic integral.

3.1F7step 2.1

Let α=ρiη be one localized term whose chart lies in Int⁡D. Its coordinate representative has compact support there; it vanishes near every point outside that support, so its coordinate derivative does too. Thus supp⁡dα⊆supp⁡α⊂Int⁡D, and [F7] gives ∫Ddα=∫R2dα=0. Its boundary integral is zero because its support misses ∂D.

3.2F1F5F6F8F9step 2.1algebra

For a localized term in a smooth-boundary or corner chart, choose a positive coordinate rectangle [a,b]×[c,d] containing its support, with the form zero near the rectangle's artificial sides. Write α=P dx+Q dy and the local boundary as y=f(x). At a corner f is continuous and piecewise C2. Suppose first that D is the side y≤f(x). By [F5], ∫Ddα=∫ab∫cf(x)(Qx−Py) dy dx. On each smooth piece of f, the difference quotient for H(x)=∫cf(x)Q(x,y) dy gives H′(x)=∫cf(x)Qx(x,y) dy+Q(x,f(x))f′(x); this follows by splitting the increment at f(x) and using continuity of Qx and f. Split [a,b] at the finitely many corner abscissas and apply [F6] on each smooth subinterval. The intermediate endpoint values of H cancel by continuity, and H vanishes near a,b, so ∫ab∫cf(x)Qx dy dx=−∫abQ(x,f(x))f′(x) dx. Applying [F6] in the y variable to P gives −∫ab∫cf(x)Py dy dx=−∫abP(x,f(x)) dx. Hence ∫Ddα=−∫ab(P(x,f(x))+Q(x,f(x))f′(x)) dx. By [F8] and [F9] the positive boundary direction on this side runs from right to left, so this is ∫∂Dα.

4.1F1F5F6F8F9step 2.1step 3.2algebra

If instead D is the side y≥f(x), use [F5] on ∫ab∫f(x)d(Qx−Py) dy dx. For H(x)=∫f(x)dQ(x,y) dy, the same difference-quotient argument gives H′(x)=∫f(x)dQx(x,y) dy−Q(x,f(x))f′(x). Split at the finitely many corner abscissas and apply [F6] on each smooth subinterval; the intermediate H values cancel by continuity and H vanishes near a,b, giving ∫ab∫f(x)dQx dy dx=∫abQ(x,f(x))f′(x) dx. Integrating −Py in y gives ∫abP(x,f(x)) dx. Thus ∫Ddα=∫ab(P(x,f(x))+Q(x,f(x))f′(x)) dx. By [F8] and [F9] the positive boundary direction is left to right, so this equals ∫∂Dα. These two graph-side calculations cover both convex and reflex corners.

5.1

Sum the local equalities of steps 3.1, 3.2, and 4.1 over the finite partition. Linearity and ∑iρi=1 near D give ∫Ddη=∫∂Dη. The empty case is in step 1.1; a single boundary component, an empty boundary, a smooth boundary with no corners, the zero form, and endpoints of the supplied arcs are covered by the same finite calculation (endpoints have measure zero). The regular-region hypothesis excludes degenerate arcs and lower-dimensional nonempty regions. Only finite choices were made in step 2.1 by [F3]; no countable or arbitrary choice is used. [F1, F3, F8, step 2.1, step 3.1, step 3.2, step 4.1, algebra, discharge-construct: Stokes formula] □

Source locator

Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature, Theorem 9.3 proof, printed pp. 164–166 (PDF pp. 180–182), gives a contextual proof of the cornered formula by smooth-domain approximation. That approximation is not imported here. The proof above derives the identity in each chart directly from the graph-section Fubini formula and Newton–Leibniz, including the piecewise-C2 corner case.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources