Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Gauss-Bonnet expression is independent of the metric

Statement

Assume the axiom of choice through the local structure, Stokes and triangulation suppliers. Let Σ be an oriented smooth surface and let D⊆Σ be a compact regular oriented surface region with finitely many ordinary corners; let g0,g1 be smooth Riemannian metrics on an open neighbourhood of D. For a smooth metric g on that neighbourhood write G(g)=∫DKg dAg+∫∂Dkg dsg+∑j=1mαj(g), where Kg is the Gaussian curvature of g, kg the signed geodesic curvature of the positively oriented boundary, and αj(g) the signed exterior angles measured with g. Then G(g0)=G(g1).

If in addition M is a closed compact nonorientable smooth surface carrying smooth metrics g0,g1 and μg denotes the orientation-free Riemannian area density of g, then ∫MKg0 μg0=∫MKg1 μg1. No classification of surfaces, Euler-Poincare theorem or characteristic-class theory is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An oriented surface with a compact regular oriented region and two smooth metrics on a neighbourhood of it; in the second part, a closed nonorientable compact surface with two smooth metrics.

[A1]

Full AC is inherited through the curvilinear triangulation supplier and its Jordan/plane-graph inputs; Stokes and the structure equation need only its countable-choice consequence (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For a smooth positive orthonormal frame of a metric g with connection form ω(X)=g(∇XE1,E2) one has dω=−Kg dAg (Gaussian curvature structure equation).

[F2]

Rotating a frame through a supplied smooth angle lift φ changes the connection form to ω+dφ; on overlaps of two frames the transition angle is the same for a whole family of frames when the transition function of the family is fixed (Rotation law for the surface connection form).

[F3]

For a regular C2 unit-speed curve with tangent T=cos⁡θ E1+sin⁡θ E2 relative to a positive frame, kg=θ′+ω(T) (Tangent-angle formula for geodesic curvature).

[F4]

For a compact regular oriented surface region with ordinary corners and a smooth one-form η on a neighbourhood, ∫Ddη=∫∂Dη (Stokes formula for finite ordinary surface corners).

[F5]

At a positively oriented ordinary corner the signed exterior angle is the unique principal turn from the incoming to the outgoing unit tangent, equal to π−β for interior angle β∈(0,2π) (Signed exterior angle at an ordinary corner).

[F6]

Reversing the parameter of a regular C2 unit-speed curve changes the sign of its signed geodesic curvature at every point (Signs of geodesic curvature under reversals).

[F7]

Every compact smooth Riemannian surface admits a finite face-to-face curvilinear triangulation with each face in a frameable chart (Finite curvilinear triangulation of a compact Riemannian surface).

[F8]

A regular oriented surface region has a finite decomposition of its boundary into regular C2 arcs and ordinary corners, with the outward-normal-first orientation (Regular oriented surface regions with corners).

[F9]

The Riemannian area density μg and the orientation-free integral of a continuous function against it are defined without a choice of orientation (Riemannian volume density, Orientation-free density integration and its properties).

Proof

technique · interpolate the two metrics, compare the two connection forms by a family of frames with fixed transition functions, and use Stokes plus the constancy of the total boundary turning
1.1A1F2given

The metric gt=(1−t)g0+tg1 is smooth and positive definite for every t∈[0,1]. Cover a neighbourhood of D by finitely many oriented charts carrying positive g0-orthonormal frames, and on each chart let At be the g0-self-adjoint positive bundle map with gt(u,v)=g0(Atu,v); the positive square root At−1/2 is smooth in the point and in t. Applying At−1/2 to a g0-orthonormal frame gives a positive gt-orthonormal frame, and because At−1/2 acts identically in every chart, the transition functions between overlapping charts are the same SO(2)-valued functions for all t.

1.2F3F5F8given

On each boundary component choose a smooth starting point and divide its finitely many C2 arcs further into finitely many chart-contained pieces. Make every genuine corner interior to one chosen frame chart, and put every added chart cut at a smooth point. For each t, choose a continuous angle lift θjt of the gt-unit tangent relative to the selected gt-frame on each smooth piece. Let Rot⁡t be the sum of their angle increments plus the genuine corner jumps αj(gt) of [F5]. Integrating [F3] piecewise and summing gives ∫∂Dkgt dsgt+∑jαj(gt)=Rot⁡t+∑j∫piece jωt,j, where each connection form is taken in that piece's selected frame.

2.1F2step 1.1

Let ωt be the connection form of the gt-frame on a chart and set β:=ω1−ω0. On an overlap, [F2] gives ωtα=ωtβ+dφαβ with φαβ independent of t by step 1.1, so β is chart-independent and defines a global smooth one-form on a neighbourhood of D.

2.2F5step 1.1step 1.2algebra

At a smooth artificial chart cut, the angle of the same tangent in the next frame differs from its angle in the preceding frame by the negative of their frame-transition angle, modulo 2π. Step 1.1 makes that transition independent of t; choose its lift once, so the jump between the two continuous angle lifts is fixed throughout [0,1]. At a genuine corner the jump between the one-sided angles in their common frame is the principal exterior angle αj(gt), with the branch fixed continuously in t because the tangent rays never become antipodal. Thus, on each closed boundary component, Rot⁡t plus the sum of the fixed artificial-cut jumps is an integral multiple of 2π: after all smooth increments and jumps the unit tangent returns to its starting direction. Both terms are continuous in t, and the artificial-cut sum is constant, so this integer multiple is constant. Summing over the boundary components gives Rot⁡1=Rot⁡0.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

By [F1], dωt=−KgtdAgt for every t, hence dβ=dω1−dω0=−Kg1dAg1+Kg0dAg0, that is Kg1dAg1−Kg0dAg0=−dβ.

4.1F4step 3.1step 1.2step 2.2algebra

Subtract the two piecewise identities of step 1.2. The connection forms ωt need not be globally defined, but on every chosen boundary piece their difference ω1−ω0 is the restriction of the global form β from step 2.1. Therefore, by steps 3.1 and 2.2, G(g1)−G(g0)=−∫Ddβ+(Rot⁡1−Rot⁡0)+∑j∫piece j(ω1,j−ω0,j)=−∫Ddβ+∫∂Dβ. Stokes [F4] makes this zero, so G(g1)=G(g0).

5.1F7F8step 4.1

For the nonorientable closed case, fix a finite curvilinear triangulation of M, which exists by [F7] applied to g0; orient each triangular face arbitrarily and give it the induced boundary orientation. Each face is a compact regular disk region with ordinary corners and carries both restricted metrics, so steps 1.1-3.1 apply to it: writing G(f)(g)=∫fKg dAg+∫∂fkg dsg+∑α(g) for the face functional, one has G(f)(g0)=G(f)(g1) for every face.

6.1F6F9step 5.1algebra∎

Summing over the finitely many faces, the area terms combine to the orientation-free integrals ∫MKg0μg0 and ∫MKg1μg1 by [F9]. Each interior edge has two incident faces on opposite sides; their inward conormals are opposite independently of their arbitrary face orientations, because reversing a face orientation reverses both its boundary tangent and its quarter-turn. Thus the signed curvature integrals cancel, and there are no boundary edges. At each vertex v with mv incident faces the face-corner angles sum to 2π, so the corner terms contribute ∑v(mvπ−2π), a number independent of the metric. Hence ∫MKg0μg0=∫MKg1μg1.

Source locator

Wendl, The Gauss-Bonnet Formula, Chapter 6, Section 6.3, printed pp. 147-152, gives the connection-form proof of Gauss-Bonnet and the transgression identity behind the comparison of two metrics (Corollary 6.42); Lee, Riemannian Manifolds, printed pp. 163-169, gives the local and global formulas in the conventions used on this page. The metric interpolation, the fixed-transition family of frames, the standard-one-form construction of step 2.1 and the closed nonorientable summation are proved here from the library items listed above; the boundary turning constant of step 2.2 uses only continuity in the metric family, so no classification theorem or Euler-Poincare identity enters this lemma.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources