Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Følner nets give Reiter nets

Statement

Let G be a locally compact Hausdorff group with fixed left Haar measure μ, and let F⊆G be Borel with 0<μ(F)<∞. The class fF:=μ(F)−11F∈L1(G) belongs to P from Reiter's condition (P1), and for every x∈G, ∥LxfF−fF∥1=μ(xF△F)μ(F). Consequently, every left Følner net (Fi) gives a Reiter net (fFi). In particular, the left Følner condition implies Reiter's condition (P1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally compact Hausdorff group G with left Haar measure μ and a Borel set F with 0<μ(F)<∞.

[A1]

Left translation carries Borel sets to Borel sets and preserves μ; thus μ(xF)=μ(F) and μ(xF△F)≤2μ(F) (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure, A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets).

[F1]

L1(G) consists of complex measurable almost-everywhere classes with ∥f∥1=∫G∣f∣ dμ (Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions).

[F2]

An indicator of a Borel set is a nonnegative simple measurable function; its nonnegative Lebesgue integral is its simple integral, namely the measure of that set (A measurable function between measurable spaces, Nonnegative simple measurable functions, The integral of a nonnegative simple function, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2givenconstructalgebra

The indicator 1F is Borel measurable and simple. By [F2], ∫G1F dμ=μ(F), so the nonnegative Borel function μ(F)−11F has finite integral and defines an L1(G) class. It is nonnegative and ∥fF∥1=μ(F)−1∫G1F dμ=1; hence fF∈P.

1.2A1F1F2algebra

For every x,y∈G, (Lx1F)(y)=1F(x−1y)=1xF(y). Thus LxfF−fF=μ(F)−1(1xF−1F), whose modulus is μ(F)−11xF△F. The symmetric difference is Borel and has finite measure by [A1]. Applying [F2] to its indicator gives ∥LxfF−fF∥1=μ(F)−1∫G1xF△F dμ=μ(xF△F)μ(F).

2.1step 1.1step 1.2givenconstruct∎

If (Fi) is a left Følner net, set fi:=fFi. Steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that fi∈P and, for every compact Q, ΔQ(fi)=ΔQ(Fi), since the pointwise discrepancies agree for each x∈Q. The defining eventual estimates therefore make (fi) a Reiter net. If only the single-set left Følner condition is given, for each compact Q and ε>0 choose a Følner witness F; step 1.1 gives fF∈P and step 1.2 gives the same estimate, so Reiter's condition (P1) holds. This uses one witness at a time and no global choice function.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources