How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fourier partial sums are Dirichlet convolutions
Statement
Let be a one-period integrable function on . Then for every and every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A one-period integrable function , an integer , and a real .
Fourier coefficients, Fourier partial sums, and torus convolution are defined exactly as in Period-one Fourier coefficients, partial sums, and convolution on the torus.
The Dirichlet kernel is , where (Dirichlet and Fejer kernels).
Proof
Expanding the convolution against the finite sum [L1, L2, algebra] gives
For each , substitute . Then The integrand is one-periodic, so its integral over equals its integral over , namely . Therefore
Summing step 2.1 over yields By [L1], the integral is also .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard S. Laugesen, Harmonic Analysis Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)