How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Marcel Riesz conjugate-function theorem on the circle
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and the conventions of Period-one Fourier coefficients, partial sums, and convolution on the torus on the torus with normalized Haar measure , so that : characters , Fourier coefficients , trigonometric polynomials as finite complex linear combinations of characters, and the conjugate function of Conjugate function on the circle, with and .
- For every the operator extends uniquely from the trigonometric polynomials to a bounded complex-linear operator , and the extensions are mutually consistent: almost everywhere for every .
- Constants lie in the kernel: for every .
- No compatible endpoint extension exists: there is no bounded operator with for every trigonometric polynomial , and no bounded operator with for every trigonometric polynomial . The failure is of strong-type boundedness; assertions about weak type , maximal truncations or a bounded mean-oscillation range are not made here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the torus with normalized Haar measure ; the conjugate function on trigonometric polynomials, .
On trigonometric polynomials is complex-linear, kills constants and preserves real-valuedness; the characters satisfy and a trigonometric polynomial has only finitely many nonzero Fourier coefficients. Conjugate function on the circle Period-one Fourier coefficients, partial sums, and convolution on the torus
For every real mean-zero trigonometric polynomial one has . The periodic conjugate square identity for real mean-zero polynomials
Parseval: for , and , the sums being finite-subset-net limits whose value is also the limit of the symmetric partial sums . The Parseval identity for Fourier series
Hölder and Minkowski for complex : for conjugate exponents and complex measurable functions, the integral of a product is bounded by the product of the norms, and the norm of a sum by the sum of the norms. Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm
Cesàro means: ; for and one has ; for continuous one-periodic one has . Cesaro and Abel means of a Fourier series Fejer means converge in L^p for 1 <= p < infinity Fejer means converge uniformly for continuous periodic functions
The Fejér kernel satisfies and . The Fejer kernel is a positive approximate identity
For one-period integrable , at every , where is real-valued, even and . Fourier partial sums are Dirichlet convolutions Dirichlet and Fejer kernels
On the continuous periodic functions with the supremum norm, , and for this number is at least . Fourier partial-sum operator norm equals the Lebesgue constant
For every measure space and the complex space is complete. Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences
Riesz–Thorin: a complex-linear map defined on the complex finite simple functions with finite-measure support which is bounded with constants between and , , , extends uniquely to a bounded operator with norm at most . Riesz-Thorin interpolation theorem
For a finite measure space and , every bounded complex-linear functional on is integration against a unique with the bilinear pairing, and the norms agree. Complex Lp duality from real Lp duality
Norm recovery: for (and only for sigma-finite measures, which includes ), . The norm is the supremum of pairings against unit functions
On a finite measure space, for and . Finite-measure includes into for
Tonelli/Fubini for functions on sigma-finite product spaces. Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
Proof
Let be a real mean-zero trigonometric polynomial. By [F3] and the coefficient rule of [F1], , where is used in the middle equality; again by [F1], is real-valued with , so is real with zero mean. Moreover [F3] with the coefficient rule gives , which is times the real number ; since is real-valued, its integral is real, so and is a real mean-zero trigonometric polynomial.
For a trigonometric polynomial put , and for put . Then is complex-linear, for every , and for every trigonometric polynomial and every one has . Indeed the definitions and of [F1] give and for every , and subtracting gives for every , which identifies the two trigonometric polynomials.
For and , . Indeed [F7] gives and with real and even, so the double integral of is at most and [F14] applies; the substitution and evenness of turn into .
For , each is a trigonometric polynomial with and ; for , each is a trigonometric polynomial with and . This is [F5] with together with [F6]: from and one gets , hence and, for , for every .
For and every real one has by [F7], hence : on the unit ball of , every is bounded by .
Put a real mean-zero trigonometric polynomial, . Then by 1.1, and for every , so every is finite. Indeed fix , put and let be real with zero mean; the square identity [F2], the identification of as a real mean-zero trigonometric polynomial in 1.1, and the definition of give , while [F4] applied with exponents to the functions and gives . Dividing by and writing yields , hence ; taking the supremum over gives the recursion.
Suppose a bounded linear satisfies for every trigonometric polynomial ; put and for . Then and for every trigonometric polynomial , by 1.2: the multiplier of is on positive frequencies, on negative frequencies and at zero, and the half-mean term supplies the remaining at zero. For with let : by 1.4 these are trigonometric polynomials with and , and 1.2 gives because is again a trigonometric polynomial on which acts as . Hence , while 1.5 with gives , so . Therefore for every , and in particular the continuous functions give .
By [F8], for every . Write . Given , choose a continuous one-periodic with and . Choose with , let have modulus one with (take if this value is zero), and set . Then by [F6], and because is continuous and its Cesaro means converge uniformly by [F5]. By pairing symmetry from 1.3 and , for all sufficiently large we have . Since , this gives for every , hence .
Suppose a bounded linear satisfies for every trigonometric polynomial ; put and define on by the same formula . Then and for every trigonometric polynomial , by the frequency check in 2.2. For with and its Cesàro means , which are trigonometric polynomials with by 1.4, identity 1.2 gives and hence ; by 1.5, , so . Therefore for every .
No bounded satisfies on trigonometric polynomials: such a would give for every by 2.2, while grows without bound by 2.3, a contradiction for large.
For every there is a finite constant with for every complex trigonometric polynomial : writing and applying 2.1 to the real mean-zero parts gives , and likewise for the imaginary part, so works; here uses and [F4]. Since the trigonometric polynomials are dense in by [F5] and that space is complete by [F9], therefore has a unique extension to a bounded complex-linear operator on with ; uniqueness holds because two continuous extensions of one map agree on the dense polynomial core.
No bounded satisfies on trigonometric polynomials: such a would give for every by 3.1, while grows without bound by 2.3, a contradiction for large.
For all one has for the bilinear pairing. Indeed, for trigonometric polynomials the coefficient identity and the rule of [F1] give , since ; both pairings are bounded bilinear functionals on (bounded by times the norm of ), and they agree on the dense polynomial core, so they agree everywhere.
Let . If , set . Otherwise choose with and let be restricted to the complex finite simple functions on . For and , approximate a simple function by trigonometric polynomials in using [F5]; since and , [F13] gives convergence in as well. The extensions therefore satisfy and as classes, so has the endpoint bounds . Applying [F10] gives an extension with , where . It agrees with on polynomials: uniformly approximate a polynomial by finite simple functions ; then in , hence in by [F13], while boundedness gives in .
Let and , so that 4.3 gives a bounded operator on with norm . For the formula defines a complex-linear functional on , bounded by because [F4] bounds ; by [F11] there is a unique with for all and . Put : then is complex-linear and bounded with . It extends the polynomial core, because for a trigonometric polynomial and any the defining identity, the consistency of 4.3 and the skew-adjointness of 4.2 give , so by the norm recovery [F12] applied to the difference in .
Collecting: for every the operator of 4.3 (for ) and of 5.1 (for ) is a bounded complex-linear extension of to , and it is the only such extension because trigonometric polynomials are dense in for and continuous extensions of one map agree on a dense set. If and , choose trigonometric polynomials in using [F5]; [F13] gives convergence in , and the bounded extensions agree on polynomials, so their images converge to the same limit. Thus . Also because kills constants by [F1]. By 3.2 there is no bounded compatible extension and by 4.1 no bounded compatible extension. This proves all three assertions.
Depends on
- Conjugate function on the circle
- Period-one Fourier coefficients, partial sums, and convolution on the torus
- The periodic conjugate square identity for real mean-zero polynomials
- The Parseval identity for Fourier series
- Riesz-Thorin interpolation theorem
- Complex Lp duality from real Lp duality
- Fejer means converge in L^p for 1 <= p < infinity
- Fejer means converge uniformly for continuous periodic functions
- The Fejer kernel is a positive approximate identity
- Cesaro and Abel means of a Fourier series
- Dirichlet and Fejer kernels
- Fourier partial sums are Dirichlet convolutions
- Fourier partial-sum operator norm equals the Lebesgue constant
- Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences
- Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm
- The $L^p$ norm is the supremum of pairings against unit $L^q$ functions
- Finite-measure $L^r$ includes into $L^p$ for $p < r$
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
99 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard S. Laugesen, Harmonic Analysis Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)