How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Fejer kernel is a positive approximate identity
Statement
For every , the Fejer kernel satisfies
Hence, for ,
so for all , , and for every ,
In particular,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and a real .
The Fejer kernel is , where and (Dirichlet and Fejer kernels).
Proof
Expanding the average in [L1] gives On the other hand, Therefore
If , the finite geometric-series formula gives so step 1.1 yields the displayed square formula. This proves for every , and at integers the same formula extends by continuity to . Also [L1] gives
For , one has . Using step 2.1 and therefore gives Integrating over an interval of length at most yields
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard S. Laugesen, Harmonic Analysis Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)