LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Multiplication by $a$ with $p ∤ a$ permutes an odd prime's signed half-system up to sign

Statement

Let $p$ be an odd prime, let $p ∤ a$ , and put $m = (p - 1) / 2$ . For each $1 \leq j \leq m$ , there are unique $ε_{j} \in {1, - 1}$ and $r_{j} \in {1, \dots, m}$ such that

$a j \equiv ε_{j} r_{j} (m o d p) .$

The absolute representatives $r_{1}, \dots, r_{m}$ are a permutation of $1, \dots, m$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An odd prime $p$ , an integer $a$ with $p ∤ a$ , and $m = (p - 1) / 2$ .

[L1]

Every class modulo a positive integer $n$ has exactly one representative $s$ with $0 \leq s < n$ (For $n \geq 1$ , every class in $Z / n$ has one representative $r$ with $0 \leq r < n$ , so $∣ Z / n ∣ = n$ ; while $Z / 0$ is in bijection with $Z$ ).

[L2]

The quotient $Z / p$ is a field (For every prime $p$ , the two operations on $Z / p$ make it a field).

[L3]

Every injection from a finite set to itself is a bijection (A subset of a finite set is finite, with $∣ B ∣ \leq ∣ A ∣$ , and equality holds if and only if $B = A$ ).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1

For $1 \leq j \leq m$ , [L1] gives the standard representative $s_{j}$ of $a j$ . It is nonzero because [L2] permits cancellation of the nonzero classes $[a]_{p}$ and $[j]_{p}$ . If $s_{j} \leq m$ , set $(ε_{j}, r_{j}) = (1, s_{j})$ ; if $s_{j} > m$ , set $(ε_{j}, r_{j}) = (- 1, p - s_{j})$ . Since $p = 2 m + 1$ , this gives the stated unique signed representative with $1 \leq r_{j} \leq m$ .

L1L2given

2.1

If $r_{j} = r_{k}$ , then $a j \equiv a k$ or $a j \equiv - a k (m o d p)$ . Cancelling $[a]_{p}$ by [L2] gives $j \equiv k$ or $j \equiv - k (m o d p)$ . In the first case $∣ j - k ∣ < p$ forces $j = k$ ; in the second, $2 \leq j + k \leq p - 1$ , so $p ∤ (j + k)$ , a contradiction. Thus $j \mapsto r_{j}$ is injective.

L2step 1.1

3.1

The map $j \mapsto r_{j}$ is an injection from the finite set ${1, \dots, m}$ to itself, so [L3] makes it a bijection. Therefore $r_{1}, \dots, r_{m}$ is a permutation of the half-system.

L3step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

The signed half-system for 3 modulo 11 gives (3/11)=1 Example
Gauss's quadratic-residue lemma Theorem

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 71 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

H. Hackman, Elementary Number Theory, Chapter D, Section D.IV (standard reference, not scraped)
W. Stein, Elementary Number Theory, Section 4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)

Multiplication by aa with p∤ap∤a permutes an odd prime's signed half-system up to sign