Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global cubic minimizers, admissible inexact steps, and cubic Cauchy decrease

Statement

For the cubic model mσ of The cubic-regularized quadratic model, with σ>0 and symmetric B, a global minimizer exists. If g≠0 and s∗ is any global minimizer, then s∗≠0 and g+Bs∗+σ∥s∗∥2s∗=0, mσ(0)−mσ(s∗)≥σ6∥s∗∥23.

More generally, every s satisfying gTs+sTBs+σ∥s∥23=0,sTBs+σ∥s∥23≥0 has mσ(0)−mσ(s)≥σ6∥s∥23. For g≠0, put a=∥g∥2 and q=gTBg. The unique minimizer of the cubic model on the negative-gradient ray {−tg:t≥0} is sC=−tCg,tC=−q+q2+4σa52σa3>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥1, σ>0, g∈Rn, symmetric B∈Rn×n, and the model mσ.

[F1]

The cubic-regularized quadratic model: mσ(s)=f(x)+⟨g,s⟩+12sTBs+σ3∥s∥23.

[F2]
[F5]

A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value: a continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space attains its minimum.

[F6]

Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers: for u>0, (u3/2)′=32u1/2.

[F7]

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1givenF1F2F3algebrachoose

Put a:=∥g∥2 and M:=∥B∥2. For r:=∥s∥2, [F2] and [F3] give mσ(s)≥f(x)−ar−12Mr2+σ3r3. Choose R>0 so that R2≥6a/σ and R≥3M/σ. For every r≥R, the first negative term is at most σr3/6 and the second is at most σr3/6; hence mσ(s)≥f(x)=mσ(0) outside the closed ball of radius R.

1.2givenF1F6algebra

Now suppose g≠0 and let s∗ be a global minimizer. For small t>0, mσ(−tg)−mσ(0)=−t∥g∥22+12t2gTBg+σ3t3∥g∥23<0, because the negative linear term dominates the quadratic and cubic terms as t↓0. Hence s∗≠0. For any direction h, put r:=∥s∗∥2>0 and ψ(t):=mσ(s∗+th)−mσ(s∗)=t⟨g+Bs∗,h⟩+12t2hTBh+σ3(r2+2t⟨s∗,h⟩+t2∥h∥22)3/2−σ3r3. By [F6], ψ′(0)=⟨g+Bs∗+σrs∗,h⟩. Since t=0 minimizes ψ, its positive difference quotients are nonnegative and its negative difference quotients are nonpositive, so this derivative is zero. Taking h=g+Bs∗+σrs∗ gives g+Bs∗+σ∥s∗∥2s∗=0.

1.3givenalgebra

Let s satisfy the two inexact-step conditions in the Statement and write r=∥s∥2. Substituting −gTs=sTBs+σr3 into the model decrease gives mσ(0)−mσ(s)=12sTBs+2σ3r3. The second condition implies sTBs≥−σr3, and therefore the right side is at least σr3/6.

1.4givenF7algebrachoose

Suppose g≠0, put a=∥g∥2>0 and q=gTBg, and define ψ(t)=mσ(−tg)−mσ(0) for t≥0. Then ψ(t)=−a2t+12qt2+σ3a3t3,ψ′(t)=−a2+qt+σa3t2. The two roots of ψ′ are t±=−q±q2+4σa52σa3; their product is −1/(σa)<0, so t−<0<t+. The derivative factors as σa3(t−t−)(t−t+), hence it is negative on [0,t+) and positive on (t+,∞). Applying [F7] on any subinterval of either range shows that ψ strictly decreases before t+ and strictly increases after it. Thus tC=t+ is the unique global minimizer on [0,∞), proving the stated Cauchy-ray formula.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3F4F5

The model is continuous: for u,v∈Rn, the triangle inequality gives ∣∥u∥2−∥v∥2∣≤∥u−v∥2. If ∥u−v∥2<1, then ∥u∥2≤∥v∥2+1, and ∣∥u∥23−∥v∥23∣=∣∥u∥2−∥v∥2∣(∥u∥22+∥u∥2∥v∥2+∥v∥22) tends to zero with ∥u−v∥2; this also holds at v=0, where ∥u∥23≤∥u∥2 for ∥u−v∥2<1. The linear term is continuous by [F2], and ∣uTBu−vTBv∣≤∥u−v∥2∥B∥2(∥u∥2+∥v∥2) by [F2] and [F3], so the quadratic term is continuous as well. The closed ball from step 1.1 is nonempty and compact by [F4]. Thus [F5] gives a minimizer on that ball. Since 0 is in the ball and every point outside has model value at least mσ(0), this minimizer is global on Rn.

2.2step 1.2givenalgebra

Global minimality also gives mσ(s∗)≤mσ(−s∗). The quadratic and cubic terms are even, so this inequality reduces to ⟨g,s∗⟩≤0. Taking the inner product of the stationary equation in step 1.2 with s∗ gives s∗TBs∗+σ∥s∗∥23=−⟨g,s∗⟩≥0. Substitution back into the model decrease yields mσ(0)−mσ(s∗)=12s∗TBs∗+2σ3∥s∗∥23≥σ6∥s∗∥23, as claimed.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2step 1.3step 1.4∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1, 1.2, and 2.2 prove the exact global-minimizer claims, step 1.3 proves the inexact-step decrease, and step 1.4 proves the Cauchy-ray assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Finite-budget adaptive regularization using cubic models.

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources