Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cubic regularization bounds consecutive unsuccessful trials

Statement

Suppose f is C2 and its Hessian is L-Lipschitz on each trial segment, meaning ∥∇2f(u)−∇2f(v)∥2≤L∥u−v∥2. Run Finite-budget adaptive regularization using cubic models with exact Hessians, and assume each trial on which a ratio is evaluated uses either an exact global cubic-model minimizer or a candidate passing the algorithm's cubic solution, residual, and Cauchy-decrease checks, together with 0<σmin≤σk≤σmax and σmax≥3L. Then no ratio-based rejection occurs when σk≥3L. If γup>1, let R∈N0 satisfy γupRσmin≥3L; such an R exists. Every block of consecutive ratio-based rejected trials has length at most R.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smoothness and weight bounds in the Statement, and the update rules of the ARC procedure.

[F1]

Finite-budget adaptive regularization using cubic models: every ratio trial passes the model-solution checks; a rejection leaves x fixed and sets σ+=min⁡{γupσ,σmax}; an accepted step keeps σ or decreases it, with floor σmin.

[F2]

The cubic-regularized quadratic model: mσ(s)=f(x)+⟨g,s⟩+12sTBs+σ3∥s∥23.

[F5]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a): for a scalar differentiable function on a closed interval, its endpoint difference equals its derivative at some interior point times the interval length.

[F7]

The Hessian of a C2 scalar field is symmetric: for C2 f, ∇2f(x) is symmetric.

[A1]

The Hessian is L-Lipschitz on each trial segment.

[A2]

Every trial on which a ratio is evaluated uses the exact Hessian and a candidate passing the two cubic decrease conditions in the algorithm; ratio-based rejection uses its stated update.

[A3]

The weights satisfy 0<σmin≤σk≤σmax, σmax≥3L, and γup>1.

[A4]

The ARC acceptance threshold satisfies 0<η1<1.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1givenA1A2A4F1F2F3F4F5F7algebra

Fix a trial point x and a solver-success candidate s that reaches the ratio computation. By [F7], B=∇2f(x) is symmetric, so the cubic model is defined. Put ϕ(t):=f(x+ts) for 0≤t≤1. The Hessian Lipschitz assumption gives ∣ϕ′′(u)−ϕ′′(v)∣=∣sT(∇2f(x+us)−∇2f(x+vs))s∣≤L∣u−v∣∥s∥23, where the bound follows from [A1], [F3], and [F4]. Define h(t):=ϕ(t)−ϕ(0)−tϕ′(0)−12t2ϕ′′(0). For t>0, [F5] applied to ϕ′ on [0,t] gives ϕ′(t)−ϕ′(0)=tϕ′′(ut) for some ut∈(0,t). Hence ∣h′(t)∣=t∣ϕ′′(ut)−ϕ′′(0)∣≤Lt2∥s∥23. Applying [F5] to h on [0,1] yields ∣f(x+s)−f(x)−⟨∇f(x),s⟩−12sT∇2f(x)s∣≤L∥s∥23. By [F2], when σ≥3L the cubic term dominates this remainder, so f(x+s)≤mσ(s). Since the trial reaches the ratio computation, g≠0 and the algorithm's first two model checks hold; the extended Global cubic minimizers, admissible inexact steps, and cubic Cauchy decrease then gives mσ(0)−mσ(s)≥σ∥s∥23/6>0. Hence ρ≥1>η1; that trial cannot be rejected.

2.1givenA3F1F6step 1.1algebra∎

If 3L≤σmin, all weights are at least 3L and there are no rejections, so take R=0. Otherwise, by [F6] choose a finite R with γupRσmin≥3L. At the start of any rejection block, σ≥σmin. After at most R consecutive rejections, repeated use of [F1] gives σ≥min⁡{γupRσmin,σmax}≥3L. By step 1.1 the next trial cannot be rejected. Thus the block contains at most R rejections.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources