Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Full-rank Gram torsor descent and extension across lower-rank strata

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Let k be algebraically closed of characteristic zero, let V have dimension m≥1 with a nondegenerate symmetric form or dimension m=2n≥2 with a nondegenerate alternating form, and let t≥m+1. On the full-rank locus of the rank-≤m Gram variety, the Gram map from spanning tuples in Vt is a principal bundle for the full orthogonal or symplectic group in the étale topology. Its regular invariant functions descend to regular functions on that locus. The omitted rank-≤m−1 symmetric stratum has codimension t−m+1, and the omitted rank-≤m−2 alternating stratum has codimension 2(t−m)+1. Using normality of the rank varieties, each descended function extends uniquely across the omitted stratum.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and the rank-variety ideal and normality claims required in Exact symmetric-minor and alternating-Pfaffian rank ideals, and the rank-stratum dimensions in Gram-map image, full-rank fibers, and rank-stratum dimensions.

[F1]

Exact symmetric-minor and alternating-Pfaffian rank ideals: the Gram rank varieties have the stated prime ideals and are normal.

[F2]

Gram-map image, full-rank fibers, and rank-stratum dimensions: full-rank Gram fibers are single free group orbits; the symmetric and alternating lower-rank codimensions have the stated formulas.

[F3]

Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian: a polynomial ring in finitely many variables over the field k is Noetherian, by iteration. Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian gives Noetherian quotients and localizations; explicitly, ideals of a quotient lift to finitely generated ideals upstairs, and an ideal in a localization is generated by the images of generators of its contraction.

[F4]

A normal Noetherian domain is the intersection of its height-one localizations: under AC a Noetherian normal domain is the intersection of its height-one localizations inside its fraction field.

[F5]

Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals: under AC over an algebraically closed field, a radical ideal is the vanishing ideal of its closed-point zero locus, including in a finite-type reduced coordinate-ring quotient.

[F6]

Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms: faithful flatness means that tensoring preserves and reflects exact sequences of modules. This is the exactness interface used in the equalizer proof below.

[F7]

Standard étale algebra: a monic polynomial quotient with invertible formal derivative is standard étale and is an étale finitely presented algebra; before localization a monic quotient is free on the powers below its degree.

[F8]

Étale stability: under AC, étale morphisms are stable under composition and arbitrary base change, including the local square-root covers used here.

[F9]

Flatness descends along faithfully flat base change: if A→C is faithfully flat, an A-module N is flat exactly when N⊗AC is flat over C.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3F5algebra

Put Y=Spec⁡R, where R is the rank ring in [F1], and let Y∘ denote its rank-m locus. Write H=ZI,I for a principal m×m block, and work over det⁡H≠0 (over a Pfaffian open in the alternating case). These opens cover Y∘: a rank-m bilinear form on kt induces a nondegenerate form on its quotient by the radical, and some m coordinate vectors form a basis of that quotient. In the block decomposition Z=(HCϵCTD), with ϵ=1 or −1, Gaussian elimination gives D=ϵCTH−1C. This identity holds in the localized ring, since it holds at every closed point and [F1] says that ring is reduced. Thus this chart is the product of the space of invertible symmetric or alternating H and the affine space of C. A tuple over this chart has an invertible column matrix T on the labels I, satisfying TTBT=H; its remaining columns are TH−1C. These formulas are identities over any chart algebra, not only at closed points.

1.2F1F3F4algebra

We verify the normal-extension interface precisely. The coordinate rank ring and its principal-open localizations are Noetherian by [F3], and normal domains by [F1]. If A is such a normal domain and f∈Frac⁡A is regular at every height-one prime, then [F4] gives f∈A. Consequently a regular function on an open subset with complement of codimension at least two extends: the open contains every height-one point, and its function defines a rational function at the generic point; apply [F4]. Its pullback agrees with the original function on the open because both are the same rational function in the domain. Uniqueness follows from that domain property as well. All hypotheses of the published supplier are satisfied, including AC.

2.1F7F8step 1.1constructinduction

Here is a cover on which such a T exists regularly. A nondegenerate symmetric H has a vector of nonzero norm among ei and ei+ej: if all these norms vanish, polarization makes every entry zero. Cover by the corresponding norm-unit opens, split off that vector by subtracting its H-orthogonal projections, and repeat on the complement. This diagonalizes H over a finite Zariski cover as QTHQ=diag⁡(d1,…,dm) with each di a unit. Adjoin ui with ui2=di. Each extension is finite free of rank two and étale because 2ui is a unit; their composite is faithfully flat. Fixing a constant isometry of B with the identity form, the matrix diag⁡(ui)Q−1, transported by that isometry, is the required T. In the alternating case choose a unit entry hij, rescale one of the corresponding vectors so their pairing is one, subtract projections onto this symplectic plane, and induct. This gives a regular symplectic basis on a Zariski cover, and hence a T without adjoining square roots. There are finitely many pivot choices, and their opens cover because every residue form is nondegenerate.

3.1F6F8F9step 2.1algebra

On any of these covers let S be the section given by T and TH−1C. Every spanning tuple X with Gram matrix Z has unique g=XIT−1 and gTBg=B. Conversely gS is a tuple with Gram matrix Z. These formulas and their inverses are regular over every base algebra, so X∘×Y∘U≃G×U over each chosen étale cover U. They also identify G×X∘ with X∘×Y∘X∘ via (g,X)↦(gX,X); the inverse uses the same invertible block formula. This establishes the scheme-theoretic torsor assertion. To apply flat descent, fix an affine principal open V=Spec⁡A⊆Y∘. Its preimage XV is affine. The finitely many pivot opens from step 2.1 restrict to principal opens D(fj) covering V. Let Cj be the chart algebra over Afj: it is finite free of positive rank in the symmetric case (the successive square-root extension) and Afj in the alternating case. Put C=∏jCj. Then A→C is faithfully flat: if an A-module M satisfies M⊗AC=0, the faithful flatness of each chart algebra gives Mfj=0; since the fj generate the unit ideal, this forces M=0. Over C, the torsor map is G×Spec⁡C→Spec⁡C, whose coordinate algebra C⊗kk[G] is faithfully flat over C because k[G] is a nonzero k-vector space. The base change of XV→V is therefore flat, so [F9] gives flatness before base change. If M⊗AO(XV)=0, faithful flatness after base change gives M⊗AC=0, hence M=0; thus XV→V is faithfully flat. These affine opens cover Y∘, proving that X∘→Y∘ is faithfully flat. The étale cover and its base changes are legitimate by [F8].

4.1F6step 3.1algebra

We spell out function descent. For a faithfully flat ring map A→C, the sequence 0→A→C⇉C⊗AC is an equalizer. Indeed tensor its difference complex with C; multiplication of the initial two C factors gives a contracting map, so the tensored complex is exact. Flatness preserves kernels and faithful flatness detects a zero homology module, proving the original equalizer assertion. On a trivial torsor G×U, a left-translation-invariant function equals its value along the identity section: apply the counit on the translation factor to the coaction identity. Hence an invariant regular function on X∘ restricts on each U to the pullback of a unique regular function on U. On overlaps the two functions pull back to the same function on the torsor, so faithful flatness and the equalizer just proved identify them and descend them to Y∘. Equivalently, the torsor isomorphism in step 3.1 identifies its invariance equation with equality of its two pullbacks to X∘×Y∘X∘. Applying the affine equalizer on the stated covers and gluing proves both existence and uniqueness of descent.

5.1F1F2step 4.1step 1.2algebra∎

The dimension formulas in [F2] give, for symmetric matrices, dm−dm−1=t−m+1 and, for alternating matrices, dm−dm−2=2(t−m)+1. All lower strata have smaller dimensions, so these are the codimensions of the respective omitted closed loci. Since t≥m+1, the codimensions are at least two and three, respectively. Apply step 1.2 to the normal domain in [F1] and the descended function from step 4.1. This proves the asserted unique extension.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources