How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Orthogonal idempotents lift over a complete formal power-series ring
Statement
Let be a field, the ring of formal power series with its -adic topology, and a unital -algebra whose underlying -module is free of finite rank. An idempotent is an element with ; idempotents are orthogonal if whenever , and a finite orthogonal family is complete if its sum is . Every finite complete orthogonal family in has a lift to a finite complete orthogonal family in , with for each .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , , a finite free unital -algebra , and a finite complete orthogonal idempotent family in .
The ring is complete and separated for the -adic topology, and every finite free module is complete and separated coefficientwise (The one-parameter formal-series ring is complete, separated, and has residue field ).
A finite free module has a finite basis and unique finite coordinate expansions (The free module on a set and its standard basis).
In a unital -algebra the image of the commutative coefficient ring is central, so commutes with every element (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms).
Proof
By [F2], a finite -basis identifies with , so [F1] makes complete and separated. Multiplication is continuous: when , expansion gives . For any idempotent , the map is continuous and idempotent; its image is the kernel of the continuous map , hence is closed in the separated module and is therefore complete.
In any such complete algebra with identity , start with satisfying . The element commutes with and satisfies . The partial sums are Cauchy because ; let be their limit. The finite geometric identity and separatedness give , so . Set . The terms commute, and expansion gives . Thus one correction squares the error and leaves the reduction of unchanged.
Starting with any lift of an idempotent in , apply step 2.1 repeatedly. If , then and . Starting with , we have , so the sequence is Cauchy. Its limit exists by step 1.1; continuity of multiplication and the error tending to zero give , and every correction lies in , so has the prescribed reduction.
Lift a complete orthogonal family by induction on . If , completeness means in ; since is free of finite rank and is a field, its reduction is , so forces its rank to be zero and hence . The empty family then lifts. For , the only member is , which already lifts the family. For , lift by step 3.1 to an idempotent and set . The remaining reductions lie in the corner and form a complete orthogonal family there. The reduction map is onto because any lift of a corner element can be replaced by . Its kernel is : if lies in , write ; then since is central by [F3], and the reverse inclusion is immediate. Thus the reduction identifies with the indicated corner. The corner is complete by step 1.1, so induction lifts the remaining family in ; its members are orthogonal to since , and their sum is . This proves the claim for .
The construction makes only finitely many initial lift choices, one for each member of the input finite family, and then applies the deterministic Newton recurrence in step 2.1. It uses no maximality principle or arbitrary family of choices. Steps 3.1 and 4.1 produce the required exact idempotents and preserve every prescribed reduction.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Structure of Finite Dimensional Algebras, MIT OpenCourseWare 18.712, Chapter 7 (standard reference, not scraped)