How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scheme structure of a finite-module rank stratum
Statement
Assume AC and DC. For a finitely presented module sheaf on a Noetherian scheme and , the functor of maps for which is locally free of constant rank is represented by a locally closed subscheme , for arbitrary test schemes . Its points are those where . On any subscheme on which this dimension is everywhere , the rank stratum is closed, with its full possibly nonreduced scheme structure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the statement and AC and DC, inherited from the scheme, cohomology, and finite-module suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
Nakayama's lemma supplies local generators lifting generators of a residue-field module (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma). Finite presentations remain right exact after any tensor product.
Proof
First restrict to the open set where the residue-field dimension is at most . This is open: from a finite presentation the condition is that its relation matrix have rank at least the number of generators minus , an open minor condition. A rank- pullback necessarily maps into . Around any point of , Nakayama supplies a surjection , permitting redundant zero generators when the dimension is smaller than . Write a finite presentation .
Let be the ideal generated by the entries of . Under any map to this neighbourhood the pullback is free of rank exactly when : if the presentation gives ; conversely the surjection from to a rank- locally free module is an isomorphism, since its determinant is a unit in every local ring. Thus the vanishing ideal defines the required closed subscheme on the neighbourhood. These closed subschemes agree on overlaps by their identical functor, hence glue to a closed subscheme of . Its underlying points are exactly the dimension- points. If all fibre dimensions on a subscheme are , that subscheme is already contained in , proving the last assertion, including nilpotents.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nitin Nitsure, Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, Sections 2–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Grothendieck, Les schémas de Hilbert, Bourbaki 221, Sections 2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)