Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scheme structure of a finite-module rank stratum

Statement

Assume AC and DC. For a finitely presented module sheaf M on a Noetherian scheme S and e≥0, the functor of maps g:T→S for which g∗M is locally free of constant rank e is represented by a locally closed subscheme Se↪S, for arbitrary test schemes T. Its points are those where dim⁡κ(s)Ms=e. On any subscheme on which this dimension is everywhere e, the rank stratum is closed, with its full possibly nonreduced scheme structure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses in the statement and AC and DC, inherited from the scheme, cohomology, and finite-module suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

[F1]

Nakayama's lemma supplies local generators lifting generators of a residue-field module (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma). Finite presentations remain right exact after any tensor product.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

First restrict to the open set U where the residue-field dimension is at most e. This is open: from a finite presentation the condition is that its relation matrix have rank at least the number of generators minus e, an open minor condition. A rank-e pullback necessarily maps into U. Around any point of U, Nakayama supplies a surjection Oe↠M, permitting redundant zero generators when the dimension is smaller than e. Write a finite presentation Oa→DOe→M→0.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Let J be the ideal generated by the entries of D. Under any map T to this neighbourhood the pullback is free of rank e exactly when DT=0: if DT=0 the presentation gives MT=OTe; conversely the surjection from OTe to a rank-e locally free module is an isomorphism, since its determinant is a unit in every local ring. Thus the vanishing ideal defines the required closed subscheme on the neighbourhood. These closed subschemes agree on overlaps by their identical functor, hence glue to a closed subscheme of U. Its underlying points are exactly the dimension-e points. If all fibre dimensions on a subscheme are e, that subscheme is already contained in U, proving the last assertion, including nilpotents.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources