Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hilbert-space Tikhonov amplifies data by at most 1/(2λ)

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let X,Y be real or complex Hilbert spaces and let A:X→Y be bounded, with Hilbert adjoint A∗. For λ>0, put Rλ=(A∗A+λIX)−1A∗, which is well-defined by The shifted Hilbert-space normal operator is invertible with inverse norm at most 1/λ. Then for every g∈Y,

∥Rλg∥≤∥g∥2λ,∥Rλ∥≤12λ.

The proof uses the normal equation and the Hilbert-space inner product; it does not use a compact-operator convergence rate or a source condition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, Hilbert spaces X,Y, a bounded linear map A:X→Y, its Hilbert adjoint A∗, λ>0, and g∈Y.

[F1]

The shifted Hilbert-space normal operator is invertible with inverse norm at most 1/λ: For Bλ=A∗A+λIX, the inverse exists and ∥Bλ−1∥≤1/λ.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is the choice assumption used to define the Hilbert adjoint in this argument; full Choice is not used.

[F2]

The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator: The adjoint satisfies ⟨Ax,y⟩Y=⟨x,A∗y⟩X.

[F3]

Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument: The inner product is linear in its first argument and conjugate symmetric.

[F4]

The induced length is a norm: The induced norm satisfies ∥v∥2=⟨v,v⟩.

[F6]

The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum: For bounded T, its operator norm is the supremum of ∥Tz∥ over ∥z∥≤1.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4algebra

Let x=Rλg. Under [A1], [F2] gives the Hilbert adjoint used in the definition of Rλ. By [F1], (A∗A+λIX)x=A∗g. Pairing with x and using [F2] gives ⟨A∗Ax,x⟩X=⟨Ax,Ax⟩Y=∥Ax∥2 and ⟨A∗g,x⟩X=⟨g,Ax⟩Y by [F2]–[F4]. Hence ∥Ax∥2+λ∥x∥2=⟨g,Ax⟩Y.

2.1F5step 1.1algebra

The left side of step 1.1 is real and nonnegative. By [F5], with s=∥Ax∥ and t=∥g∥, step 1.1 gives λ∥x∥2=⟨g,Ax⟩−s2≤∣⟨g,Ax⟩∣−s2≤ts−s2. Completing the square gives ts−s2=t24−(s−t/2)2≤t2/4. Since λ>0, taking nonnegative square roots yields ∥Rλg∥=∥x∥≤∥g∥/(2λ).

3.1F6step 2.1algebra∎

The pointwise inequality of step 2.1 holds for every g∈Y. Taking the supremum over the unit ball in [F6] gives ∥Rλ∥≤1/(2λ).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources