How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hom to costandards counts Verma-flag factors
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be Verma-filtered (Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities). Then for every weight The result is stated for all weights, including equal and incomparable labels.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Verma-filtered object , and a weight .
A Verma flag of length has a top step in which is Verma-filtered of length , and the multiplicities are additive along the step: ; the zero object has the empty flag and all multiplicities zero (Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities).
For all weights one has and ; and (Standard-costandard Hom and Ext-one orthogonality).
Category is abelian and has enough projectives (Category O is abelian and extension closed among weight modules, Category O has enough projectives). The exact contravariant equivalence exchanges projectives and injectives: is exact for projective . Dualizing a projective epimorphism therefore embeds into the injective , proving enough injectives (Restricted duality is exact and involutive on O). Finitely generated -modules have a set of representatives, since they are quotients of for finite . Work on a set-sized skeleton of ; under AC choose a projective epimorphism onto and an injective embedding of each object, then recursively cover kernels and embed cokernels to supply resolutions. AC implies DC by selecting successors in any serial relation. Fix these resolution systems and use the canonical comparison identifications of The balanced Ext bifunctor. For a short exact sequence in and every there is a natural exact sequence (The long exact Ext sequence in the first variable).
Proof
If has the empty flag, then and while all multiplicities vanish, so both formulas hold.
Let have a Verma flag of length with top step ; then has a Verma flag of length and . Assume as induction hypothesis that the two formulas hold for .
The long exact sequence of [F3] for the top step begins . By [F2] and the induction hypothesis of step 1.2 the fourth and sixth terms vanish, so the sequence gives the short exact sequence and the vanishing of . Taking dimensions and using [F2] and step 1.2, .
By induction on the flag length, steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove and for every Verma-filtered and every weight .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The balanced Ext bifunctor
- Restricted duality is exact and involutive on O
- Category O has enough projectives
- Category O is abelian and extension closed among weight modules
- Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities
- Standard-costandard Hom and Ext-one orthogonality
- The long exact Ext sequence in the first variable
Used by
- BGG reciprocity Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lin Chen, lecture notes (Spring 2024), Lecture 9, Proposition-Definition 2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups (18.757, Fall 2023), Sec. 20.2 (standard reference, not scraped)