How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The cyclic induction subgroup is an ideal of the character ring
Statement
Let be a finite group. Then the cyclic induction subgroup is an ideal of the character ring .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group , an element , and an element .
By definition, consists of finite sums with each cyclic and each (The cyclic induction subgroup of the character ring).
Induction and restriction satisfy the projection formula: (Induction and restriction satisfy the projection formula on character rings).
Proof
By [F1], write with each cyclic and each .
Multiplying by and applying [F2] termwise gives . Each factor lies in , so every summand on the right again belongs to by [F1].
Therefore . Since and were arbitrary, is an ideal of .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory, Section 4.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Janos Kramar, Artin's and Brauer's Theorems on Induced Characters, Lemma 1 (standard reference, not scraped)