Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Artin induction for rational characters

Statement

Let G be a finite group, and let xRQ(G) in the sense of The rational representation ring RQ(G) and rational-valued class functions. Then:

  1. x is a rational linear combination of characters induced from cyclic subgroups of G.
  2. Equivalently, the controlled multiple Gx lies in the cyclic induction subgroup Icyc(G).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G and an element xRQ(G).

[F1]

The cyclic induction subgroup Icyc(G) is an ideal of R(G) (The cyclic induction subgroup is an ideal of the character ring).

[F2]

The trivial character satisfies an Artin relation G1G=iaiIndCiG1Ci with CiG cyclic and aiZ (A positive integer multiple of the trivial character is an integral combination of cyclic permutation characters).

[F3]

The projection formula says (IndHGχ)ψ=IndHG(χResHGψ) (Induction and restriction satisfy the projection formula on character rings).

[A1]

If a finite-dimensional representation is defined over Q, then its restriction to a subgroup is again defined over Q.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [F2], choose cyclic subgroups CiG and integers ai with G1G=iaiIndCiG1Ci. Multiplying by x in R(G) gives Gx=iai(IndCiG1Ci)x. Because [F1] makes Icyc(G) an ideal containing each IndCiG1Ci, this already shows GxIcyc(G).

F1F2givenalgebra
2.1

Applying [F3] to each summand of step 1.1 yields Gx=iaiIndCiG(ResCiGx). By [A1], each ResCiGx again lies in the rational representation ring of the cyclic subgroup Ci. This identity is an explicit expression of Gx as a sum of characters induced from cyclic subgroups.

F3A1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Dividing the identity of step 2.1 by G expresses x as a rational linear combination of characters induced from cyclic subgroups of G. This is claim 1.

step 2.1algebra
4.1

Conversely, if x is any rational linear combination of characters induced from cyclic subgroups, then multiplying by a common positive denominator places that multiple of x in Icyc(G). Step 1.1 shows that one may take the specific controlled denominator G, so claims 1 and 2 are equivalent.

F1step 1.1step 3.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources