Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Convergence and geometric tails for integer-order Bessel series

Statement

For n≥0, z≠0, and either series in Integer-order Bessel series, the absolute term ratio is

rk=∣z∣24(k+1)(k+n+1).

At z=0, the order-zero series have only the constant term a0=1 and positive orders have only zero terms; in every case the tail after terms k=0,…,K is zero. The series for Jn and In converge absolutely and locally uniformly in z∈C. If K≥0 and q=∣z∣2/[4(K+2)(K+n+2)]<1, then the tail after terms k=0,…,K has absolute value at most ∣aK+1∣/(1−q), where ak is the corresponding series term. The first two formal termwise derivative series also converge locally uniformly.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥0, z∈C, and the two power series in Integer-order Bessel series.

[F1]

Integer-order Bessel series: the terms are akJ=(−1)k(z/2)2k+n/(k!(k+n)!) and akI=(z/2)2k+n/(k!(k+n)!).

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

For z≠0, every term is nonzero, and cancellation of the factorials gives ∣ak+1∣/∣ak∣=∣z∣2/[4(k+1)(k+n+1)]. This ratio decreases to 0. At z=0, the series have only the possible order-zero constant term, so every tail after k=0 is zero without using a quotient.

2.1step 1.1algebra

For z≠0 and k≥K+1 the ratios are at most q, so ∑k=K+1∞∣ak∣≤∣aK+1∣∑j=0∞qj=∣aK+1∣/(1−q). At z=0 the same tail bound holds because the tail is zero. On each disk ∣z∣≤R, put qR=R2/[4(K+2)(K+n+2)]. For sufficiently large K, qR<1 and the nonzero-argument tail is bounded uniformly by sup⁡∣z∣≤R∣aK+1(z)∣/(1−qR); at z=0 it is zero. Thus the series converge uniformly on every disk.

3.1step 1.1algebra∎

For derivative order d∈{1,2}, put m=2k+n. When m≥d, the absolute value of the formal derivative term on ∣z∣≤R is at most bk=m(m−1)⋯(m−d+1)Rm−d/(2mk!(k+n)!). For R>0 the ratio bk+1/bk equals R2/[4(k+1)(k+n+1)] times a factor tending to 1, so it tends to 0. The ratio test makes ∑bk finite; the Weierstrass test then gives uniform convergence of each formal derivative series on the disk. The finitely many terms with m<d have zero derivative, and a disk of radius R=0 is immediate.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Integer-order Bessel series.

Dependency tree · one level

1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources