How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stable extension of the EIT inverse map
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice, and let , and the concave modulus be as in the mean-zero NTD observation and Hilbert extension statements. Regard as a real Hilbert space with its complex norm. The exact-data inverse map is well-defined and satisfies Consequently the Hilbert-valued extension from the preceding theorem agrees with on the exact kernel image and retains this stability bound on the whole underlying real Hilbert space of complex-valued kernels. Each exact NtD kernel is real-valued, but the extension domain includes all complex-valued kernels.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the conductivity classes, the exact kernels, and the candidate modulus in the Statement.
The IP-45 stability theorem controls the conductivity difference by a saturated logarithmic function of the weak DN operator difference. (Logarithmic L2 stability for Calderón conductivity classes)
The NTD observation assigns a unique zero-mean-in-each-variable kernel by the smoothing and Hilbert–Schmidt theorem. (Mean-zero NtD map and smoothed kernel observation, NtD smoothing and Hilbert–Schmidt kernel bounds)
The concave same-modulus Hilbert extension agrees with the exact-data inverse map on its defining subset. (Hilbert-valued extension with a concave modulus)
The kernel distance controls the weak DN distance by , including at . (NtD smoothing and Hilbert–Schmidt kernel bounds)
The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice are inherited at the weak-solution, spectral and Hilbert-extension interfaces. (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Proof
Given: the data in the Statement.
By [F2] every conductivity has its unique zero-mean kernel. If , [F4] gives and [F1], with its value zero at zero, gives in . Thus assigning defines a function on the exact image, independently of the conductivity representative. This remains valid if that image is empty.
For any exact pair, [F4] and [F1] give with for and value zero at zero. Its concavity and continuity are proved in [F3]. Applying that theorem to the function established in step 1.1 gives an extension to the entire underlying real Hilbert space of complex-valued kernels, with the same inequality for every pair of inputs and agreement on the exact image. If the class is empty, the zero map also supplies an extension. This proves both clauses.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.