Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Iterated kernel densities retain convolution lower bounds

Statement

Let P be ϕ-irreducible on a countably generated space, with nonzero σ-finite irreducibility measure ϕ. For each n≥1 there are a jointly measurable pn and a singular residual kernel Sn such that Pn(x,dy)=pn(x,y)ϕ(dy)+Sn(x,dy), and versions may be chosen so that for every r,s≥1 and every x,y, pr+s(x,y)≥∫pr(x,z)ps(z,y)ϕ(dz),pr+s(x,y)≥∫Pr(x,dz)ps(z,y). For every x, ∑n≥1pn(x,y)>0 for ϕ-almost every y.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The countably generated space, ϕ-irreducible kernel, and irreducibility measure in the Statement.

[F1]

Phi-irreducibility for a general-state Markov kernel: every ϕ-positive set is reached from every state at some finite positive time.

[F2]

Measure kernel and probability kernel: a probability kernel has measurable evaluations and probability-measure sections.

[F3]

Measurable Lebesgue decomposition of a kernel on a countably generated space: each Pn has a jointly measurable density component and singular residual kernel.

[F4]

Measurability of integration against a kernel: integration of a nonnegative product-measurable function against a probability kernel is measurable.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: retain the Choice assumption of [F3] and choose countably many sectionwise singular supports.

[F5]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative sums and kernel integrals can be interchanged.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and facts [F1]–[F5], and [A1].

1.1F2F3F4F5A1

Apply [F3] to each Pn, obtaining preliminary densities pn0 and singular residuals Sn. Inductively set p1=p10 and, for n>1, pn(x,y)=max⁡(pn0(x,y),sup⁡1≤k<n∫Pn−k(x,dz)pk(z,y)). For each k<n, the lifted kernel ((x,y),A)↦Pn−k(x,A) is a probability kernel by [F2]. Apply [F4] to this kernel and the nonnegative product-measurable integrand ((x,y),z)↦pk(z,y); finite maxima preserve measurability. Thus the right side is jointly measurable. For each fixed x, composition of kernels gives Pn(x,A)≥∫A∫Pn−k(x,dz)pk(z,y)ϕ(dy). Since Sn(x,⋅) is singular, this domination forces each candidate density to be at most pn0(x,⋅) ϕ-almost everywhere. Thus pn=pn0 ϕ-a.e. for each x, so it is still the density part and has both displayed convolution lower bounds pointwise by construction.

1.2F1F3A1

Fix x. For each n, choose a ϕ-null support Nn of Sn(x,⋅) and let F=⋂n≥1Nnc. Then ϕ(Fc)=0 and every residual assigns zero mass to F. If B⊆F has ϕ(B)>0, [F1] gives an m with Pm(x,B)>0; because the residual gives B zero mass, ∫Bpm(x,y)ϕ(dy)>0.

2.1F5step 1.2∎

Therefore every positive-ϕ subset of F intersects {∑npn(x,⋅)>0} in positive measure. Its complement in F must be ϕ-null; otherwise take that complement as B in step 1.2, which would make every integral zero. Hence the density sum is positive ϕ-almost everywhere.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources