Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Jantzen layer dimensions sum to the Gram determinant valuation

Statement

In the setting of The Jantzen filtration of a lifted cell module (R a PID, π a prime element, F=R/πR, M free of finite rank with a form whose extension to K=Frac⁡(R) is non-degenerate), let νπ be the π-adic valuation normalised by νπ(π)=1 and let G∈R∖{0} be the Gram determinant of the form with respect to any R-basis of M. Then νπ(G)=∑i>0dim⁡FMF(i), where MF(i) are the Jantzen layers of The Jantzen filtration of a lifted cell module; in particular the sum is finite and independent of the chosen basis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A PID R with prime element π, residue field F=R/πR, fraction field K, a free R-module M of finite rank d with a symmetric R-bilinear form ⟨ , ⟩ that is non-degenerate over K, and its Jantzen filtration M(i)⊆M with layers MF(i)=(M(i)+πM)/πM (The Jantzen filtration of a lifted cell module).

[F1]

(The Jantzen filtration of a lifted cell module) The M(i), i≥0, are submodules with M(0)=M and M(i+1)⊆M(i), and MF(i)=0 for all sufficiently large i.

[F2]

(Every matrix over a PID has a Smith normal form) There are R-bases e1,…,ed of M and f1,…,fd of M together with nonzero r1,…,rd∈R such that ⟨ei,fj⟩=δijri for all i,j; the ri are the elementary divisors of the Gram matrix.

[F3]

For any R-basis of M with Gram matrix G one has det⁡G=r1⋯rd up to a unit, so νπ(G)=∑iνπ(ri), and νπ is normalised by νπ(π)=1 and takes the value 0 on units.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2

Description of the Jantzen layers: write x=∑iaiei in the basis of [F2]. Since f1,…,fd is an R-basis of M, the condition ⟨x,y⟩∈πkR for all y∈M is equivalent to ⟨x,fj⟩∈πkR for all j; as ⟨x,fj⟩=ajrj, this gives M(k)={∑iaiei:νπ(airi)≥k for all i} with the convention νπ(0)=∞. Reducing modulo πM, whose basis is πe1,…,πed, shows that MF(k) has as an F-basis the images of those ei with νπ(ri)≥k: if νπ(ri)≥k then the image of ei lies in MF(k), while if νπ(ri)<k then every element of M(k) has ei-coefficient divisible by π. Hence dim⁡FMF(k)=#{i:νπ(ri)≥k}.

2.1step 1.1F1

Summation: since each ri is nonzero, the sets {k>0:νπ(ri)≥k} are finite of cardinality νπ(ri); by step 1.1 and [F1], ∑k>0dim⁡FMF(k)=∑k>0#{i:νπ(ri)≥k}=∑iνπ(ri).

3.1step 2.1F3∎

Conclusion: by [F3] the right-hand side is νπ(G) for any Gram matrix G of the form in any R-basis of M; the left-hand side is defined purely in terms of M and the form, so the identity holds for every basis and the sum is finite and basis-independent.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources