How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Jantzen filtration of a lifted cell module
Definition
Let be a principal ideal domain (Principal ideal domain) with a chosen prime element , let be the residue field, and let be a free -module of finite rank (The free module on a set and its standard basis) equipped with a symmetric -bilinear form whose extension to the fraction field is non-degenerate (equivalently for a Gram matrix of the form). For put Then , the are -submodules with , the descending chain stabilises at (that is, for all sufficiently large , because ), and , the radical of the reduced form. This finite descending filtration is the Jantzen filtration of with respect to . The hypotheses are exactly: a PID, a prime element, the form non-degenerate over ; no valuation-ring or DVR hypothesis is substituted, and the prime element , its ideal and the fraction field are kept distinct. Each is a submodule: for the cell forms on this page the associativity identity shows closedness under the action. For , define . This maximum is finite: otherwise the uniquely determined elements give an ascending chain of ideals whose union is principal, say generated by an element in its -th ideal. The chain then stabilizes at , whereas and cancellation would make a unit. For termination, put . If , its coordinate column satisfies , so the adjugate identity gives . For , primality of forces every coordinate of into . Thus and . In rank zero the filtration is already zero. Finally a reduced vector belongs to the reduced form radical exactly when any lift pairs with every vector of into , which is exactly membership in . No choice principle is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Mathas, Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, complete prepublication manuscript (1998; expanded published edition: AMS University Lecture Series 15, 1999); complete 79-page manuscript, SHA-256 8cfeb611a95a3ff25cb95ad22bfd3a68475818301c34b04d131a8480a1b997e0 (standard reference, not scraped)