How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The type-A Hecke Specht module and its cell form
Definition
Let be a commutative ring and . With the Murphy cellular basis of (The Murphy tableau elements form a cellular basis, Cellular bases and cell modules) and the canonical tableau of shape (Murphy elements and Murphy tableau elements), the Murphy cell module is the right cell module of the Murphy basis: it is the free -module with basis - the classes of the Murphy elements whose first index is the canonical tableau - and acts by whenever . (The cellular action rule transforms the second index and fixes the first, so the cell module is defined using the fixed-first-index family above; the diagonal span in need not be stable under multiplication. For it is stable, since .) Its cell form is the unique bilinear form with for all ; it is symmetric and associative and is a submodule, so is a right -module (The cell form is associative and its radical is a submodule).
Convention (Dipper-James signed cellular normalization). Let be the involutive algebra automorphism defined by (The Hecke sign automorphism, pullback and contragredient dual). For a right module , write for the same -module with action . The page's ordinary Specht normalization is the signed conjugate Murphy construction where is the conjugate partition (Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation). Its form is the form of on the same underlying module; because commutes with this is associative for the twisted action (The Hecke sign automorphism, pullback and contragredient dual). Over a field put Thus and ; conjugation alone does not identify these modules (Murphy cells are the same-shape contragredient Specht duals, Ordinary Specht modules are the signed conjugate Murphy cells). At , , so these identities contain tensoring with sign; in characteristic the sign twist becomes trivial at (Polytabloid specialization and the exact signed multiplicity dictionary). The nonzero quotients in this signed normalization have -regular labels by The simple type-A Hecke modules are indexed by e-regular partitions ↗: that theorem proves the nonzero Murphy quotient criterion in -restricted labels, and conjugation makes these precisely -regular labels (e-regular and e-restricted partitions). No generic root-of-unity Hecke claim is inferred from the published prime-characteristic group-only sign dictionary, and no semisimplicity or choice principle is assumed.
Depends on
- Cellular bases and cell modules
- Murphy elements and Murphy tableau elements
- e-regular and e-restricted partitions
- Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation
- The cell form is associative and its radical is a submodule
- The Murphy tableau elements form a cellular basis
- The Hecke sign automorphism, pullback and contragredient dual
- Murphy cells are the same-shape contragredient Specht duals
- Ordinary Specht modules are the signed conjugate Murphy cells
- Polytabloid specialization and the exact signed multiplicity dictionary
Used by
- The type-A Hecke decomposition matrix is dominance unitriangular Corollary
- Type-A Hecke Specht modules are in the same block iff their labels have the same e-core Corollary
- Cellularity does not make every cell module simple Counterexample
- The Jantzen filtration of a lifted cell module Definition
- Virtual Weyl and Specht symbols attached to beta sequences Definition
- The q-Schaper calculation for (3,2) at e = 2 Example
- A graded algebra isomorphism transports the graded module category, its Grothendieck groups and its dualities Lemma
- Hecke Specht theory specialises to group Specht theory at q = 1 Proposition
- Separated Hecke residues give seminormal idempotents and bases Theorem
- The Hecke Jucys-Murphy action is dominance triangular Theorem
- The q-Schaper virtual radical-layer formula Theorem
- The Schur functor sends Weyl and simple modules to Specht and Hecke simple modules Theorem
- The simple type-A Hecke modules are indexed by e-regular partitions Theorem
- The weight-one block decomposition pattern Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Mathas, Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, complete prepublication manuscript (1998; expanded published edition: AMS University Lecture Series 15, 1999); complete 79-page manuscript, SHA-256 8cfeb611a95a3ff25cb95ad22bfd3a68475818301c34b04d131a8480a1b997e0 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Kleshchev, Representation theory of symmetric groups and related Hecke algebras, arXiv:0909.4844v1, complete 66-page survey (standard reference, not scraped)