How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cellular bases and cell modules
Definition
Let be a commutative ring with and a unital -algebra (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms) that is free as an -module on a finite set , where is a finite poset (Partial order and partially ordered set; its strict order is written ) and each is a finite set. For let be the -submodule of spanned by all with .
Then is a cellular basis of , and is a cellular algebra, if:
(i) the -linear map with for all is an algebra anti-automorphism of , i.e. and (equivalently is an isomorphism of with the opposite algebra; the displayed formula forces ); and
(ii) for every , every and every there exist coefficients (), independent of , such that for every
Cell modules. For let be the free -module with basis ; condition (ii) makes a right -module by when , and it makes a left -module via , the left action being . Both actions are well defined on the freely spanning basis elements by (ii): the coefficients are unique because is an -basis of and the quotient by kills exactly the basis elements indexed by strictly larger labels, while applying the anti-automorphism (i) to (ii) gives the same triangularity for left multiplication. The module is the (right) cell module of , and via , where is spanned by all with . A cellular algebra may have several cellular bases.
Depends on
Used by
- Cellular decomposition matrices are unitriangular for the cell order Corollary
- Cellularity does not make every cell module simple Counterexample
- The type-A Hecke Specht module and its cell form Definition
- The type-A q-Schur algebra and its Weyl modules Definition
- The Murphy cellular basis of H(S₃) Example
- An integral essential-subset basis and count for type-A root intervals Lemma
- Cyclotomic semistandard sums give the actual Schur endomorphism basis Lemma
- DVR cellular Jantzen filtration and exact Gram valuation Lemma
- Nonzero-form cellular heads, cell purity and shared-factor linkage Lemma
- The cell form is associative and its radical is a submodule Lemma
- Graded Specht heads classify the graded simple modules Theorem
- Nonzero cell heads classify the simple modules of a cellular algebra Theorem
- q-Schur Weyl modules are in the same block iff their labels have the same e-core Theorem
- The Murphy tableau elements form a cellular basis Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Mathas, Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, complete prepublication manuscript (1998; expanded published edition: AMS University Lecture Series 15, 1999); complete 79-page manuscript, SHA-256 8cfeb611a95a3ff25cb95ad22bfd3a68475818301c34b04d131a8480a1b997e0 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Mathas and Marcos Soriano, Seminormal forms and Gram determinants for cellular algebras, arXiv:math/0604108; J. reine angew. Math. 619 (2008) 141-173; complete 29-page author-hosted preprint, SHA-256 a2cd21ced7f35dee695388304c26804ef8ac9c54b661a5d624501c80864698a1 (standard reference, not scraped)